Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 225–257

The Two Pratyabhijñā Theories of Error



In this essay, it is argued that Abhinavagupta’s theory of error, the apūrṇakhyāti theory, synthesizes two distinguishable Pratyabhijñā treatments of error that were developed in three phases prior to him. The first theory was developed in two stages, initially by Somānanda in the Śivadṛṣṭi (ŚD) and subsequently by Utpaladeva in his Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikās (ĪPK) and his short autocommentary thereon, the Īśvarapratyabhijñāvṛtti (ĪPVṛ). This theory served to explain individual acts of misperception, and it was developed with the philosophy of the Buddhist epistemologists in mind. In a third phase, Utpaladeva developed in his Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti (ŚDVṛ) a second theory of error, one that involved the noncognition of non-duality (abhedākhyāti) and served to explain both the appearance and perception of multiplicity, despite the strict monism to which all Pratyabhijñā authors subscribe. Abhinavagupta’s treatment of error, then, is significant not only because it was meant to explain all the various theories of error offered by opposing philosophical schools, as Rastogi has shown, but more importantly because it synthesized the thinking of his predecessors on the matter in a single, elegant account of error.


Pratyabhijñā apūrṇakhyāti abhedākhyāti abheda Error Buddhist epistemologists 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


Manuscript Sources

  1. Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda. (T) Trivandrum University, number 5854-H.Google Scholar
  2. Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda. (C) Calcutta Sanskrit College, CS 3, 153.Google Scholar
  3. Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda, along with the Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti of Utpaladeva. (G) Göttingen, Niedersächsische Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek, Cod.Ms.Sanscr.Vish 5 (11).Google Scholar
  4. Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda, along with the Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti of Utpaladeva. (J) Raghunāth Mandir Library, Jammu.Google Scholar
  5. Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda, along with the Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti of Utpaladeva. (P) Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, Pune, number: 805 of 1891-95.Google Scholar
  6. Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānanda, along with the Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti of Utpaladeva. (R) Rajasthan Oriental Research Institute, Jodhpur.Google Scholar

Primary Sources

  1. Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā (ĪPK) of Utpaladeva. Ed. and Trans. by Raffaele Torella. 1994. The Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā of Utpaladeva with the Author’s Vṛtti: Critical Edition and Annotated Translation. Roma: IsMEO.Google Scholar
  2. Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikāvṛtti (ĪPVṛ) of Utpaladeva. See Īśvarapratyabhijñākārikā.Google Scholar
  3. Īśvarapratyabhijñāvimarśinī (ĪPV) of Abhinavagupta. Ed. by Madhusudan Kaul Shāstrī. 1918–1921. The Īśvarapratyabhijñā of Utpaladeva with the Vimarśinī by Abhinavagupta. KSTS 22 and 23. Pune: Aryabhushan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛtivimarśinī (ĪPVV) of Abhinavagupta. Ed. by Pt. Madhusūdan Kaul Shāstrī. 1938, 1941, and 1943. The Īśvarapratyabhijñā Vivṛtivimarśinī by Abhinavagupta. 3 Vols. KSTS 60, 62 and 65. Pune: Aryabhushan Press.Google Scholar
  5. Nyāyabindu of Dharmakīrti. 1954. Nyāyabinduḥ Śrīdharmottarācāryakṛ taṭikāsametaḥ. Ed. by Śrī Candraśekhara Śāstri. Śrī Kāśī Saṃskṛtagranthamālā 22. Vāraṇasī: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Book-Depot.Google Scholar
  6. Śivadṛṣṭi (ŚD = Ked.) of Somānanda. 1934. The Śivadṛṣṭi of Somānandanātha with the Vṛtti by Utpaladeva. Ed. by Madhusudan Kaul Shastri. KSTS 54. Pune: Aryabhushan Press.Google Scholar
  7. Śivadṛṣṭivṛtti (ŚDVṛ) of Utpaladeva. See Śivadṛṣṭi.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Bandyopadhyay N. (1988) The concept of contradiction in Indian philosophy. Journal of Indian Philosophy 16(3): 225–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dreyfus G. (1997) Recognizing reality: Dharmakīrti’s philosophy and its Tibetan interpretations. SUNY Press, Albany, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunne J.D. (2004) Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s philosophy. Wisdom Publications, BostonGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunne J.D. (2006) Realizing the unreal: Dharmakīrti’s theory of yogic perception. Journal of Indian Philosophy 34(5): 497–519Google Scholar
  5. Franco E. (1986) Once again on Dharmakīrti’s deviation from Dignāga on Pratyakṣābhāsa. Journal of Indian Philosophy 14: 79–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Franco E. (1993) Did Dignāga accept four types of perception?. Journal of Indian Philosophy 21(3): 295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gnoli R. (1957) Śivadṛṣṭi by Somānanda: Translation and commentary, chapter I. East and West 8: 16–22Google Scholar
  8. Hattori, M. (1968). Dignāga: On perception, being the Pratyakṣapariccheda of Dignāga’s Pramāṇasamuccaya. Harvard Oriental Series 47. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hayes R. (1997) Whose experience validates what for Dharmakīrti?. In: Bilimoria P., Mohanty J.N. (eds) Relativism, suffering, and beyond: Essays in memory of Bimal K. Matilal. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 105–118Google Scholar
  10. Katsura S. (1984) Dharmakīrti’s theory of truth. Journal of Indian Philosophy 12: 215–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kellner, B. (1997). Types of incompatibility (’Gal ba) and types of noncognition (Ma/Mi Dmigs) in early Tibetan Tshad Ma literature. In H. Krasser, M. T. Much, E. Steinkellner, & H. Tauscher (Eds.), Tibetan studies: Proceedings of the 7th seminar of the international association of Tibetan studies, Graz, 1995 (Vol. 1, pp. 495–510). Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  12. Kyuma, T. (1997). Bheda and Virodha. In S. Katsura (Ed.), Dharmakīrti’s thought and its impact on Indian and Tibetan philosophy: Proceedings of the third international Dharmakīrti conference, Hiroshima, Nov 4–6, 1997 (pp. 225–232). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  13. Mikogami E. (1979) Some remarks on the concept of Arthakriyā. Journal of Indian Philosophy 7: 79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nagatomi, M. (1967–1968). Arthakriyā. The Adyar Library Bulletin, 31–32, 52–72.Google Scholar
  15. Nemec, J. (forthcoming). The Ubiquitous Śiva: Somānanda’s Śivadṛṣṭi and his tanric interlocutors. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pandey K.C. (1963/2000) Abhinavagupta: An historical and philosophical study (2nd ed). Varanasi, Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series OfficeGoogle Scholar
  17. Rastogi N. (1986) Theory of error according to Abhinavagupta. Journal of Indian Philosophy 14(1): 1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ratié I. (2007) Otherness in the Pratyabhijñā philosophy. Journal of Indian Philosophy 35(4): 313–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanderson A. (1990) The visualization of the deities of the Trika. In: Padoux A. (eds) L’Image divine: Culte et meditation dans l’hinduisme. Éditions du CNRS, Paris, pp 31–88Google Scholar
  20. Stcherbatsky, T. (1932/1993). Buddhist logic, 2 Vols, 1st Indian edition. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  21. Torella R. (1992) The Pratyabhijñā and the logical-epistemological school of Buddhism. In: Goudriaan T. (eds) Ritual and speculation in early tantrism: Studies in honor of André Padoux. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 327–346Google Scholar
  22. Torella, R. (2007a). Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛti. Part I. Apoha and anupalabdhi in a Shaiva Garb. In K. Preisendanz (Ed.), Expanding and merging horizons: Contributions to South Asian and cross-cultural studies in commemoration of Wilhelm Halbfass (pp. 473–490). Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  23. Torella, R. (2007b). Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛti. Part II. What is memory. In B. Kellner, et al. (Eds.), Indica et Tibetica: Festschrift für Michael Hahn Zum 65. Geburtstag von Freunden und Schülern überreicht (pp. 539–563). Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  24. Torella, R. (2007c). Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛti. Part III. Can a cognition become the object of another cognition? In D. Goodall & A. Padoux (Eds.), Mélanges tantriques à la mémoire d’Hélène Brunner (pp. 475–484). Pondicherry: Institut Française de Pondichéry / École Française d’Extrême-Orient.Google Scholar
  25. Torella, R. (2007d). Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñāvivṛti. Part IV. Light of the subject-light of the object. In B. Kellner, et al. (Eds.), Pramanakirtih. papers dedicated to Ernst Steinkellner on the occasion of his 70th birthday (Vol. 2, pp. 925–939). Wien: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  26. Torella, R. (2008). From an adversary to the Main Ally: The place of Bhartṛhari in the Kashmirian Shaiva Advaita. In M. Kaul & A. Aklujkar (Eds.), Linguistic traditions of Kashmir: Essays in memory of Pandit Dinanath Yaksh (pp. 508–524). New Delhi: D. K. Printworld.Google Scholar
  27. Torella, R. (forthcoming). Studies in Utpaladeva’s Īśvarapratyabhijñā-vivṛti. Part V: Selfawareness and yogic perception.Google Scholar
  28. Woo J. (2003) Dharmakīrti and his commentators on Yogipratyakṣa. Journal of Indian Philosophy 31(5): 439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Religious studiesUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations