Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 35, Issue 5–6, pp 521–541 | Cite as

Epistemology and Language in Indian Astronomy and Mathematics

  • Roddam NarasimhaEmail author


This paper is in two parts. The first presents an analysis of the epistemology underlying the practice of classical Indian mathematical astronomy, as presented in three works of Nīlakaṇṭha Somayāji (1444–1545 CE). It is argued that the underlying concepts put great value on careful observation and skill in development of algorithms and use of computation. This is reflected in the technical terminology used to describe scientific method. The keywords in this enterprise include parīkṣā, anumāna, gaṇita, yukti, nyāya, siddhānta, tarka and anveṣaṇa. The concepts that underlie these terms are analysed and compared with such ideas as theory, model, computation, positivism, empiricism etc. In a short second part, it is proposed that the primacy awarded to number and computation in classical Indian science led to an artificial language that did include equations but emphasized displays that facilitated calculation, as in the Bakshali manuscript (800 CE?). It is further argued that echoes of these concepts can be recognized in current science, where computation is once again playing a greater role triggered by spectacular developments in computer technology.


Indian Philosophy Deductionist Logic Indian Logic Technical Terminology Modern Notation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chakrabarti, A. (2003). The concepts of jnana, prama and aprama. Text of lecture delivered at NIAS Bangalore, September 2003.Google Scholar
  2. Datta, B., Singh, A.N. (1962) History of Hindu mathematics. Parts I and II Bombay, Asia Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  3. Feynman, R.P. (1949) The theory of positrons. Physical Review, 16, 749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ganeri, J. (eds) (2001) Indian logic. A reader. Richmond, Surrey. Curzon Press, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayashi, T. (1995) The Bakhshālī manuscript. Egbert Forsten, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  6. Hiriyanna, M. (1932) Outlines of Indian philosophy. George Allen & Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Jeffreys, H. (1931) Scientific inference. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Matilal, B. K. (1998-99). Character of logic in India (Ed. J. Ganeri, H. Tiwari). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Mehra, J. (1994) The beat of a different drum: The life and science of Richard Feynman. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Minkowski, C. (2004) Competing cosmologies in early modern Indian astronomy. In: Burnett, C., Hogendijk, J., Plofker, K. (eds) Ketuprakasa: Studies in the history of the exact sciences in honor of David Pingree, pp. 349–385. Leiden, BrillGoogle Scholar
  11. Motte A. (1848). The Principia by Isaac Newton (Trans.) New York, NY: Prometheus Books (Reprint 1995).Google Scholar
  12. Narasimha, R. (2001) Sines in terse verse. Nature, 414, 851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Narasimha, R. (2003) The Indian half of Needham’s question. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 28(1), 54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Narasimha, R. (2008a). The yukti of classical Indian astronomy. In B. V. Sreekantan (Ed.), The foundations of science (forthcoming). New Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilizations.Google Scholar
  15. Narasimha, R. (2008b). Chequered histories of epistemology and science. In B. Ray (Ed.), Different kinds of history (forthcoming). New Delhi: Centre for Studies in Civilizations.Google Scholar
  16. Neugebauer, O. (1975) A history of ancient mathematical astronomy. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Playfair, J. (1790) Remarks on the astronomy of the Brahmins. Transactions of the Royal Society, Edinburg, 2(1), 135–192Google Scholar
  18. Playfair, J. (1798). On the trigonometry of the Brahmins. Transactions of the Royal Society, Edinburg. In the works of John Playfair, Esq. 3, 255–276.Google Scholar
  19. Pingree D. (2003). The logic of non-western science. Daedalus, Fall, 45–53.Google Scholar
  20. Sachau, E. C. (1964). Alberuni’s India (reprinted). Delhi.Google Scholar
  21. Sarma, K.V. (1976) (Siddhānta-darpaṇam) Mirror of the laws of astronomy of Nīlakaṇṭha Somayāji. Punjab University, HoshiarpurGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarma, K.V. (1977a) (Jyotir-mīmāmsa) Investigations on astronomical theories by Nīlakaṇṭha Somayāji. Punjab University, HoshiarpurGoogle Scholar
  23. Sarma, K. V. (1977b). Tantra-sańgraha of Nīlakaṇṭha Somayaji. Hoshiarpur, India: VVBISIS, Punjab University.Google Scholar
  24. Sarma, K. V. (2002). Nilakaṇṭha Somayaji (1444–1545 AD) In: Sriram et al. 2002, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  25. Sriram, M. S., Ramasubramanian, K., & Srinivas, M. D. (2002). 500 Years of Tantasangraha. Shimla: Ind. Instt. Adv. Study.Google Scholar
  26. Staal, F. (1988) Universals. Studies in Indian logic and linguistics. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Staal, F. (1995) The Sanskrit of science. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 23, 73–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weyl, H. (1950) The theory of groups and quantum mechanics (trans. H. P. Robertson). Dover, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. Wittgenstein, L. (2001)/(1921). Tractatus logico-philosophicas (trans. by D. F. Pears, B. F. McGuinness). Routledge Classis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Wofram, S. (2002) A new kind of science. Wolfram Media, Champaign IL, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research/National Institute of Advanced StudiesBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations