Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 371–403

Reconciling dualism and non-dualism: three arguments in Vijñānabhikṣu’s Bhedābheda Vedānta



The late 16th century Indian philosopher Vijñānabhikṣu is most well known today for his commentaries on Sāṃkhya and Yoga texts. However, the majority of his extant corpus belongs to the tradition of Bhedābheda (Difference and Non-Difference) Vedānta. This article elucidates three Vedāntic arguments from Vijñānabhikṣu’s voluminous commentary on the Brahma Sūtra, entitled Vijñānāmṛtabhāṣya (Commentary on the Nectar of Knowledge). The first section of the article explores the meaning of bhedābheda, showing that in Vijñānabhikṣu’s understanding, “difference and non-difference” does not entail a denial of the principle of contradiction. The second shows how the relation between the individual soul (jīva) and Brahman can be understood as a relation of part and whole. The third section discusses Brahman as cause of the world, and Vijñānabhikṣu’s particular formulation of Brahman as “locus cause” (adhiṣṭhānakāraṇa). Understanding these arguments enables us to appreciate how Vijñānabhikṣu’s Difference and Non-Difference Vedānta is a credible alternative to the Advaita Vedānta schools prevalent in northern India in the late medieval period, and how in his later works Vijñānabhikṣu built upon this Difference and Non-Difference metaphysical framework to argue for the unity of Vedānta, Yoga, and Sāṃ-khya philosophies.


Bhedābheda Nyāya Sāṃkhya Vedānta Vijñānabhikṣu 


Bṛh. Up.

Bṛhadāranyaka Upaniṣad


Brahma Sūtra

Chānd. Up.

Chāndogya Upaniṣad


Sāṃkhyapravacanabhāṣya of Vijñānabhikṣu

Śvet. Up.

Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad


Vijñānāmṛtabhāṣya of Vijñānabhikṣu

Viṣ. Pu.

Viṣṇu Purāṇa


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Appaya Dīkṣita (1989). In B. Shastry (Ed.), Siddhāntaleśasaṃgraha. Varanasi: Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan.Google Scholar
  2. Bhāskara (1903). In Pandit Vindhyeshvari Prasada Dvivedin. (Ed.), Brahmasūtrabhāṣyam. Benareṣ Chowkhamba Sanskrit Book Depot.Google Scholar
  3. Bhāvāgaṇeśa (1969). Sāṃkhyatattvayāthārthyadīpana. In V. P. Dvivedi (Ed.), Sāṃkhyasaṃgraha (pp. 33–58). Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.Google Scholar
  4. Dasgupta, S. (1922). A history of Indian philosophy, Vol. I-V. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  5. Hacker, P. (Ed. and trans.) (1949). Upadeshasāhasrī: Unterweisung in der All-Einheits-Lehre der Inder von Meister Shankara. Bonn: Ludwig Röhrscheid Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Hiriyanna M. (1957) Indian philosophical studies, Vol I–II. Kavyalaya Publishers, MysoreGoogle Scholar
  7. Ingalls D.H.H. (1953) Śaṃkara on the Question: Whose is avidyā?. Philosophy East and West 3: 69–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Matilal B.K. (1968) The Navya-Nyāya doctrine of negation. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Matilal B.K. (1986) Perception: An essay on classical Indian theories of knowledge. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Nakamura H. (1989) A history of early vedānta philosophy, Part 1. Motilal Banarsidass, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  11. Nicholson, A. J. (2005a). Doctrine and boundary-formatioṇ The philosophy of Vijñānabhikṣu in Indian intellectual history. Ph.D. Diss., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Nicholson A.J. (2005b) Vijñānabhikṣu’s yoga: A note on doctrinal identity in late-medieval India. Journal of Vaishnava Studies 14: 43–63Google Scholar
  13. Nicholson, A. J. (2006). Bhedabheda Vedanta. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Scholar
  14. Oberhammer, G. (1997). Materialien zur Geschichte der Rāmānuja-Schule III: Yādavaprakāśa, der vergessene Lehrer Rāmānujas. Wieṇ Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  15. Olivelle P. (1996) The early upaniṣads: Annotated text and translation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Potter K.H. (1963) Presuppositions of India’s philosophies. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  17. Potter K.H. (1977) Encyclopedia of Indian philosophies, Vol. II: The tradition of Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika up to Gaṅgeśa. Motilal Banarsidass, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  18. Potter K., Bhattacharyya S. (1993) Encyclopedia of Indian philosophies, Vol VI: Indian philosophical analysis Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika from Gaṅgeśa to Raghunatha Śiromaṇi. Motilal Banarsidass, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  19. Prakāśānanda (1975). In Arthur Venis. (Ed. And trans.), Vedāntasiddhāntamuktāvalī. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Orientalia.Google Scholar
  20. Ram K. (1995) Integral non-dualisṃ A critical exposition of Vijñānabhikṣu’s system of philosophy. Motilal Banarsidass, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  21. Rao S. (1996) Two ‘Myths’ in Advaita. Journal of Indian Philosophy 24: 265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Śaṅkara (1996). Brahmasūtrabhāṣyam, with Bhāmatī and Bhāmatīvyākhyā. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Vidyā Bhavan.Google Scholar
  23. Smith F.M. (1998) Nirodha and the Nirodhalakṣaṇa of Vallabhācārya. Journal of Indian Philosophy 26: 489–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith F.M. (2005) The hierarchy of philosophical systems according to Vallabhācārya. Journal of Indian Philosophy 33: 421–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vedānta Deśika (1974) Śatadūṣaṇī. Madras: V.D. RamaswamiGoogle Scholar
  26. Vijñānabhikṣu (1895). In R. Garbe, (Ed.), Sāṃkhya-pravacana-bhāṣya (Harvard Oriental Series, Vol. II). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Vijñānabhikṣu (1979). In Pandit Kedāranātha Tripāṭhī (Ed.), Brahmasūtra – Vijñānāmṛtabhāṣyam. Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Vijñānabhikṣu (1981). In T.S. Rukmani (Ed. and trans.), Yogavārttika of Vijñānabhikṣu, Vol. I. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Asian and Asian American StudiesStony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations