Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 497–519 | Cite as

Realizing the unreal: Dharmakīrti’s theory of yogic perception

  • John D. Dunne
Original Paper


The Buddhist epistemologist Dharmakīrti (fl. ca. 7th century C.E.) developed a theory of yogic perception that achieved much influence among Buddhist thinkers in India and Tibet. His theory includes an odd problem: on Dharmakīrti’s view, many of the paradigmatic objects of the adept’s meditations do not really exist. How can one cultivate a meditative perception of the nonexistent? This ontological difficulty stems from Dharmakīrti’s decision to construe the Four Noble Truths as the paradigmatic objects of yogic perception. For him, this ontological problem manifests in an epistemological corollary: “impermanence” (anityatā) and other features of the Noble Truths are conceptual, but the adept’s meditative perception of them must be nonconceptual. How can a nonconceptual cognition apprehend a conceptual object? A key aspect of Dharmakīrti’s theory of concepts provides a solution to this problem. Specifically, Dharmakīrti maintains that a concept, when taken as a mental event, can be considered a particular and thus an object of nonconceptual cognition. Taking this approach, Dharmakīrti downplays the notion that yogic perception is an encounter with real things in the world, in part because it is phenomenally akin to hallucination. Instead, what counts for Dharmakīrti—and what differentiates the adept’s realization from the madman’s hallucination—are the salvific effects induced by the meditative experience.


Buddhist philosophy Dharmakirti Perception Yogipratyaksṣa Contemplative epistemology Contemplative theory 



Pramāṇasamuccaya of Dignāga (2005)


Pramāṇavārttika of Dharmakīrti (1938–40)


Pramāṇavārttikasvopajñavṛtti of Dharmakīrti (1960)


Pramāṇaviniscaya of Dharmakīrti (1966)


Abhidharmakośa of Vasubandhu (1970)


Abhidharmakośabhāṣya of Vasubandhu (1970)


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


Primary sources

  1. Barber, A. W. (Editor in chief). (1991). The Tibetan Tripitaka: Taipei Edition. Taipei: SMC Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Buddhaghosa. (1975). The path of purification (Visuddhimagga) (B. Ñāṇamoli, Trans. 3rd ed.).Kandy, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society.Google Scholar
  3. Devendrabuddhi. (1991). Tshad ma rnam ’grel kyi ’grel pa [ ≈ Pramāṇavārttikapañjikā ]. Translatedby Subhutiśrī and dGe ba’i blo gros. bsTan-’gyur, sDe dge edition. Tshad Ma, Vol. Che, 1a–326b. Reproduced in Barber, Vol. 46.Google Scholar
  4. Dharmakīrti. (1955). Nyāyabindu with Dharmottara’s Nyāyabinduṭīkā and Durvekamiśra’s Dharmottarapradīpa (Ed. by Dalsukh Malvania). Tibetan Sanskrit Works Series 2. Patna:Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Dharmakīrti. (1938–40). Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇavārttika with a Commentary by Manorathanandin (Ed. by Rāhula Sāṃkṛtyāyana). Journal of the Bihar and Orissa Research Society, 24/3–26/3 [Issued as Appendices].Google Scholar
  6. Dharmakīrti. (1966). Dharmakīrtis Pramāṇaviniścayaḥ: 1. Kapitel: Pratyakṣam. Einleitung, Textder tibetischen übersetzung, Sanskritfragmente, deutsche übersetzung (Ed. by Tilmann Vetter). Vienna: österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  7. Dharmottara. (1991a). Tshad ma rnam par nges pa’i ’grel bsahd [= Pramāṇaviniścayaṭīkā]. Trans. by Parahitabhadra and Blo ldan shes rab. Bstan ’gyur, Sde-dge edition. Vol. Dze, 1b-289a. Reproduced in Barber, Vol. 48.Google Scholar
  8. Dignāga. (2005). Dignāga’s Pramāṇasamuccaya, Chapter 1: Hypothetical reconstruction of theSanskrit text with the help of the two translations on the basis of the hitherto known Sanskritfragments and the linguistic materials gained from Jinendrabuddhit’s Ṭīkā (Ed. by ErnstSteinkellner). Scholar
  9. Prajñākāragupta. (1953). Pramāṇavārttikabhāṣyam or Vārttikālam:kāraḥof Prajñākāragupta (Ed. by Rāhula Sāṃkṛ tyāyana). Patna: Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Śākyabuddhi. (1991). Tshad ma rnam ’grel kyi ’grel bshad [≈ Pramāṇavārttikaṭīkā]. (Trans. by Subhutiśrī and dGe ba’i blo gros. bsTan-’gyur, sDe dge edition. Tshad ma, Vols. Je and Nye, 1–282a. Reproduced in Barber, Vol. 47.Google Scholar
  11. Śākyabuddhi. (1992) A study of the Pramāṇavārttikaṭīkā by śākyabuddhi from the national archives collection, Kathmandu. Part I: Sanskrit fragments transcribed (Ed. by M. Inami, K. Matsuda & T. Tani). Studia Tibetica 23. Tokyo: Tōyō Bunko.Google Scholar
  12. Vasubandhu. (1970). Abhidharmakośa and Bhāṣya of ācārya Vasubandhu with Sphut:ārthāCommentary of Ācārya Yaśomitra (Ed. by Swami Dwarkidas Shastri). Bauddhabhā ratī Series, 5–9. Vārāṇasī: Bauddhabhā ratī.Google Scholar
  13. Vyomaśiva. (1983). Vyomavatī. In G. Kaviraj & D. Shastri (Eds.), Praśastapādabhāsyam of Praśasta Devāchārya: with commentaries (up to Dravya) “Sūktī” by Jadiṣa Tarkala_nkāra, “Setu” by Padmanābha Miśra and “Vyomavatī” by Vyomiṣivāchārya (to the end). Reprint of CSS 61 (1924–30).Google Scholar

Secondary sources

  1. Adam, M. “Meditation and the Concept of Insight in Kamalaśīla’s Bhāvanākramas.” PhD Dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
  2. Apple J. (2003). Twenty varieties of the Sam:gha: A typology of noble beings (ārya) in Indo Tibetan scholasticism (part I). Journal Indian Philosophy 31: 503–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dravid R.R. (1972) The problem of universals in Indian philosophy. Motilal Banarsidass, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunne, J. D. (2004). Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s philosophy. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Franco E. (1993) Did Dignāga accept four types of perception?. Journal of Indian Philosophy 21: 295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Franco, E. (1997). Dharmakīrti on compassion and rebirth. WSTB 38. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  7. Franco E. (2005) On Pramāṇasamuccayavṛtti again. Journal of Indian Philosophy 33: 631–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gethin R. (1998) The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayes, R. P. (1997). Whose experience validates what for Dharmakirti. In P. Bilimoria & J. N. Mohanty (Eds.), Relativism, suffering, and beyond: Essays in memory of Bimal K. Matilal (pp. 105–118). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jinpa T. (2002) Self, reality and reason in Tibetan philosophy: Tsongkhapa’s quest for the middle way. Routledge-Curzon, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  11. Kajiyama, Y. (1978). Later Mādhyamikas on epistemology and meditation. In M. Kiyota (Ed.), Mahāyāna Buddhist meditatioṇ Theory and practice (pp. 114–143). Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  12. McClintock S.L. (2000) Knowing all through knowing one: Mystical communion or logical trick in the Tattvasaṃgraha and Tattvasam:grahapañjikā. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 23: 225–244Google Scholar
  13. McDermott, C. (1978). Yogic direct awareness as a means of valid cognition in Dharmakīrti and Rgyal-tshab. In M. Kiyota (Ed.), Mahāyāna Buddhist Meditatioṇ Theory and practice (pp. 144–166). Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  14. Oetke, C. (1993). Bemerkungen zur Buddhistischen Doktrin der Momentanheit des SeiendeṇDharmakīrtis Sattvānumāna. WSTB 29. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  15. Pemwieser, M. (1991). Materialien zur Theorie der yogischen Erkenntnis im Buddhismus. M.A. Thesis, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
  16. Prévèreau, R. (1994). Dharmakīrti’s account of yogic intuition as a source of knowledge. M.A. Thesis, McGill University.Google Scholar
  17. Siderits, M. (1991). Indian philosophy of language: Studies in selected issues. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 46. DordrechṭKluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Steinkellner, E. (1978). Yogische Erkenntnis als Problem im Buddhismus. In G. Oberhammer (Ed.), Transzendenzerfahrung, Vollzugshorizont des Heilṣ das Problem in indischer und christlicher Tradition (pp. 121–134). Vienna: Institut für Indologie der Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  19. Steinkellner, E. (1999). Yogic cognition, tantric goal, and other methodological applications of Dharmakīrti’s kāryānumāna-Theorem. In S. Katsura (Ed.),Dharmakīrti’s thought and its impact on Indian and Tibetan philosophy: Proceedings of the third international Dharmakīrti conference, Hiroshima, November 4–6, 1997 (pp. 349–362). Vienna: Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  20. Vetter, T. (1990). Der Buddha und seine Lehre in Dharmakīrtis Pramāṇavārttika: Der Abschnittüber den Buddha und die vier edlen Wahrheiten im Pramāṇasiddhi-Kapitel; Eingeleitet, ediertund übersetzt. (2nd Revised ed). WSTB 12. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  21. Woo J. (2003) Dharmakīrti and his commentators on Yogipratyakṣa. Journal of Indian Philosophy 31: 439–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ReligionEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations