Journal of Indian Philosophy

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 367–395 | Cite as

Nāgārjuna’s Catuṣkoṭi

  • J. Westerhoff


Continuum Hypothesis Indian Philosophy Paraconsistent Logic Semantic Distinction Presupposition Failure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ames, W. (1982). ‘The Notion of svabhāva in the Thought of Candrakīrti.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 10.Google Scholar
  2. Bharadwaja, V.K. (1984). ‘Rationality, Argumentation and Embarassment: A Study of the Four Logical Alternatives (catuṣkoṭi) in Buddhist Logic.’ Philosophy East and West 34(3):303–319.Google Scholar
  3. Cardona G. (1967). ‘Negations in Pāṇinian Rules.’ Language 43(1):34–56Google Scholar
  4. Chakravarti, S. (1980). ‘The Mādhyamika catuṣkoṭi or Tetralemma.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 8:303–306.Google Scholar
  5. Chi, R.S.Y. 1969Buddhist Formal LogicLuzac and Co.LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Chi, R.S.Y. 1974‘Topics on Being and Logical Reasoning’Philosophy East and West24293300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dasgupta, S. 1942A History of Indian PhilosophyCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. de la Vallée Poussin, L. (ed.) (1903–1913). Mū lamadhyamakakārikās de Nāgārjuna avec la Prasannapadā commentaire de Candrakīrti. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
  9. Dummett, M. (1998). ‘Philosophy of Mathematics.’ In A.C. Grayling (ed.), Philosophy 2. Further Through the Subject (pp. 122–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dummett, M. 2000Elements of IntuitionismOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Feer, L. (ed.) (1888). Sautta Nikāya. London: Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
  12. Galloway, B. 1989‘Some Logical Issues in Madhyamika Thought’Journal of Indian Philosophy17135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ganeri, J. 2001Philosophy in Classical India: The Proper Work of ReasonRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Garfield, J. (1995). The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way. Translation and Commentary of Nāgārjuna’s Mū lamadhyamakakārikā. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Garfield, J. (1996). ‘Emptiness and Positionlessness: Do The Mādhyamika Relinquish All Views?’ Journal of Indian Philosophy and Religion (1):1–34.Google Scholar
  16. Ghose, R.N. (1987). ‘The Modality of Nāgārjuna’s Dialectics.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy 15:285–309.Google Scholar
  17. Go rams pa bSod nams seng ge. (1988). lTa ba’i shan byed theg mtshog gnad kyi zla zer. Sarnath: Sakya Student’s Union.Google Scholar
  18. Gunaratne, R.D. (1980). ‘The Logical Form of the catuṣkoṭi: A new Solution.’ Philosophy East and West 30(2):211–238.Google Scholar
  19. Gunaratne, R.D. (1986). ‘Understanding Nāgārjuna’s catuṣkoṭi.’ Philosophy East and West 36(3):213–234.Google Scholar
  20. Hahn, M. (ed.) (1982). Nāgārjuna’s Ratnāvalī: The Basic Texts (Sanskrit, Tibetan, Chinese). Bonn: Indica et Tibetica Verlag.Google Scholar
  21. Heyting, A. 1971Intuitionism. An IntroductionNorth HollandAmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopkins, J. 1998Buddhist Advice for Living and Liberation; Nagarjuna’s Precious GarlandSnow LionIthacaGoogle Scholar
  23. Jayatilleke, K.N. 1963Early Buddhist Theory of KnowledgeGeorge Allen & UnwinLondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Jayatilleke, K.N. 1967‘The Logic of the Four Alternatives’Philosophy East and West176983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kajiyama, Y. 1973 ‘Three Kinds of Affirmation and Two Kinds of Negation in Buddhist Philosophy.’Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ostasiens und Archiv für indische Philosophie17161175Google Scholar
  26. Kalupahana, D. 1975Causality. The Central Philosophy of BuddhismUniversity Press of HawaiiHonoluluGoogle Scholar
  27. King, R. 1999Indian PhilosophyAn Introduction to Hindu and Buddhist Thought. Edinburgh University PressEdinburghGoogle Scholar
  28. Mannoury, G. (1947). Les fondements psycho-linguistique des mathémathiques. Neuchâtel: Editions du Griffon.Google Scholar
  29. Matilal, B. 1971Epistemology, Logic and Grammar in Indian Philosophical AnalysisMoutonThe HagueGoogle Scholar
  30. Matilal, B. 1986PerceptionAn Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge. ClarendonOxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Morris, R. (ed.) (1988). Aṅguttara Nikāya. London: Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
  32. Murti, T.V.R. (1955). Central Philosophy of Buddhism. A Study of Madhyamika System. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Nalamoli, B.Bodi, B. eds. 2001The Middle Length Discourses of the BuddhaWisdomLondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Ng, Y.-K. 1993T’ien-T’ai Buddhism and Early MādhyamikaTendai InstituteHawaiiGoogle Scholar
  35. Oberhammer, G. Prets, E. & Prandstettter, J. Terminologie der frühen philosophischen Scholastik in Indien. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  36. Pap, A. 1960‘Types and Meaninglessness’Mind694154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Priest, G. & Garfield, J. (2002). ‘Nāgārjuna and the Limits of Thought.’ In G. Priest: Beyond the Limits of Thought (pp. 249–270). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Raju, P.T. 1954‘The Principle of Four-cornered Negation in Indian Philosophy’Review of Metaphysics7694713Google Scholar
  39. Renou, L. 1942Terminologie grammaticale du sanskritChampionParisGoogle Scholar
  40. Robinson, R. (1957). ‘Some Logical Aspects of Nāgārjuna’s System.’ Philosophy East and West 6:291–308.Google Scholar
  41. Robinson, R. (1967). Early Mādhyamika in India and China. Madison, Milwaukee, London: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  42. Robinson, R. 1969‘Review of ‘Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge’Philosophy East and West196981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Routley, R. 1969‘The Need for Nonsense’Australasian Journal of Philosophy47367384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruegg, D.S. (1977). ‘The Use of the Four Positions of the catuṣkoṭi and the Problem of the Description of Reality in Māhāyana Buddhism.’ Journal of Indian Philosophy (5):1–171.Google Scholar
  45. Ruegg, D.S. (1978). ‘Mathematical and Linguistic Models in Indian Thought: The Case of Zero and śūnyatā.’ Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens und Archiv für Indische Philosophie 22:1171–1181.Google Scholar
  46. Ruegg, D.S. (2002). Two Prolegomena to Madhyamaka Philosophy. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien.Google Scholar
  47. Schayer, S. (1931). Ausgewählte Kapitel aus der Prasannapadā. Krakow: Nakładem Polskiej Akademji Umietjetności.Google Scholar
  48. Schayer S. (1933). Altindische Antizipationen der Aussagenlogik. Bulletin de’l Académie Polonaise 90–96Google Scholar
  49. Searle, J. 1969Speech ActsAn Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Shaw, J.L. 1978‘Negation and the Buddhist Theory of Meaning’Journal of Indian Philosophy65977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sommers, F. (1965). ‘Predicability.’ In M. Black (ed.), Philosophy in America (pp. 262–281). George Allan & Unwin.Google Scholar
  52. Staal, F. (1962). ‘Negation and the Law of Contradiction in Indian Thought: A Comparative Study.’ Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 25:52–71.Google Scholar
  53. Staal, F. (1975). Exploring Mysticism. Penguin.Google Scholar
  54. Thomason, R.H. 1972‘A Semantic Theory of Sortal Incorrectness’Journal of Philosophical Logic1209258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tillemans, T.J.F. (1990). Materials for the Study of Āryadeva, Dharmapāla and Candrakīrti. Wien: Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  56. Tillemans, T.J.F. (1999). ‘Formal and Semantic Aspects of Tibetan Buddhist Debate Logic.’ In Scripture, Logic, Language. Essays on Dharmakīrtī and his Tibetan Successors. Wisdom.Google Scholar
  57. Tola, F., Dragonetti, C. 1995On Voidness. A Study on Buddhist NihilismMotilal BanarsidassDelhiGoogle Scholar
  58. Trencker, V. eds. 1888Majjhima-NikāyaPali Text SocietyLondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Tsong kha pa bLo bzang grags pa. (1973). rTsa shes tik chen. Sarnath.Google Scholar
  60. Walleser, M. (ed.) (1914). Bhāvaviveka’s Prajñāpradīpa., Vol. 226 of Bibliotheca Indica. Calcutta.Google Scholar
  61. Wayman, A. 1977‘Who Understands the Four Alternatives of the Buddhist Texts?’Philosophy East and West27321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wood, T.E. (1994). Nāgārjunian Disputations. A Philosophical Journey through an Indian Looking-glass. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PhilosophyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations