Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A Psychological Report is Literally a Mind on Paper

  • 1 Accesses

Abstract

In psychological assessment, there is a tension between oral and written language. This tension is rarely troubled or even noted in clinical practice. For report writing purposes, psychologists routinely transform oral, socially embedded material into written texts. In this paper, I highlight three points in the psychological assessment process where this transformation occurs: one during testing, the second in the analysis and interpretation phase, and the third while writing the final report. As written language is not oral language put on paper, a conceptual linguistic leap is needed that has the potential to subtly distort how the minds of others are represented and constructed. Furthermore, there are literary aspects of scientific psychological report writing that are often invisible to both writers and readers, which leads to additional distortions. Underlying the above-noted conceptual leap is the assumption that the borderline between oral and written language is porous and the principles and rules of each are interchangeable. Some alternative approaches to psychological assessment are offered that acknowledge the specific nature of oral and written language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Berman, P., & Horton, R. (2015). Case reports in The Lancet: A new narrative. The Lancet,385, 1277.

  2. Brockmeier, J. (2018). From memory as archive to remembering as conversation. In B. Wagoner (Ed.), Handbook of culture and memory (pp. 41–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  3. Brockmeier, J., & Olson, D. R. (2009). The literacy episteme: From Innis to Derrida. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 3–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  4. Erwin, W. M., & Cannon, T. M. (1973). Psychological reports: An alternative to traditional methodology. Psychology is the Schools,10(4), 404–406.

  5. Goldstein, K. (1995). The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man (Originally published 1934). New York: Zone Books.

  6. Hurwitz, B. (2017). Narrative constructs in modern clinical case reporting. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science,62, 65–73.

  7. Hydén, L.-C. (2017). Entangled narratives: Collaborative storytelling and the re-imagining of dementia. New York: Oxford University Press.

  8. Kenny, N. P., & Beagan, B. L. (2004). The patient as text: A challenge for problem-based learning. Medical Education,38, 1071–1079.

  9. Luria, A. (1979). The making of mind: A personal account of Soviet psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  10. Medved, M. I., & Brockmeier, J. (2004). Making sense of traumatic experiences: Telling your life with Fragile X syndrome. Qualitative Health Research,14, 741–759.

  11. Medved, M. I., & Brockmeier, J. (2008). Talking about the unthinkable: Brain injuries and the “catastrophic reaction”. In L. C. Hyden & J. Brockmeier (Eds.), Culture, health and illness: Broken narratives (pp. 54–72). New York: Routledge Press.

  12. Medved, M. I., & Brockmeier, J. (2010). Weird stories: Brain, mind, and self. In M. Hyvarinen, L.-C. Hyden, & M. Tamboukou (Eds.), Beyond narrative coherence (Studies in Narrative series) (pp. 17–32). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

  13. Olson, D. R. (1996). The world on paper: Conceptual and cognitive implications of writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  14. Olson, D. R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  15. Pryzwanky, W. B., & Hanania, J. S. (1986). Applying problem-solving approaches to psychological reports. Journal of School Psychology,24(2), 133–141.

  16. Vygotsky, L. (1954). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Maria I. Medved.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Transcription Conventions

CAPITALS :

Speech that is louder than surrounding speech

Italics :

Increase in pitch

Underlining :

Emphasis

(:):

Prolongation of proceeding vowel

>  < ::

 Slow down talk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Medved, M.I. A Psychological Report is Literally a Mind on Paper. Interchange (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-020-09388-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Report-writing
  • Psychology
  • Literacy
  • Testing