Advertisement

Interchange

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 537–548 | Cite as

The Data of Deviance: Disintegrative Shaming and Exclusion in Queensland Schools

  • Paul BleakleyEmail author
  • Cindy-lou Bleakley
Article

Abstract

It is the purpose of this study to determine the extent to which the implementation of the Positive Behaviour for Learning (PBL) model and its focus on data-driven behaviour management has impacted on exclusion rates in Queensland public schools and, as such, the commitment of Queensland public schools to reintegration of students with behavioural issues. Using the open source data on student exclusion rates and the reasons for exclusion, it is possible to determine shifting patterns over the last 10 years. In doing so, it has been possible to identify how the approach to exclusion in Queensland public schools has changed in the period since the introduction of the OneSchool data aggregation software. An analysis of exclusion data shows that while long-term suspensions have decreased over the last 10 years, the rate of short-term suspension and exclusion has increased. There has been a particular increase in disciplinary absences related to conduct issues like refusal to participate in class, rather than more serious violations like physical violence or drug use. Using Braithwaite’s reintegrative shaming model as a framework to analyse this behavioural exclusion data indicates that an over-reliance on exclusion is steering Queensland schools away from the principles of restorative justice, and has a negative impact on student outcomes.

Keywords

Discipline Student behaviour Suspension Expulsion Student attrition School culture 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Becker, H. (1973). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York City: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. New York City: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell, F. (2019). School suspensions, expulsions jump 12 per cent, but minister says that’s good. Brisbane Times, Retrieved 3 May from https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/politics/queensland/school-suspensions-expulsions-jump-12-per-cent-but-minister-says-that-s-good-20190503-p51jy4.html. Accessed 28 Sept 2018.
  4. Cameron, L. and Thorsborne, M. (1999, February). Restorative justice and school discipline: Mutually exclusive? A practitioner’s view of the impact community conferencing in queensland schools. Paper presented to the Reshaping Australian Institutions Conference, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar
  5. Casella, R. (2003). Zero tolerance policy in schools: Rationale, consequences, and alternatives. Teachers College Record,105(5), 872–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Department of Education. (1996). Managing student behaviour in a supportive school environment. Brisbane, QLD: Queensland State Government.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Education and Training. (2017). School disciplinary absences by region, 2012–16. Brisbane, QLD: Queensland State Government.Google Scholar
  8. Department of Education and Training. (2018). School disciplinary absences by reasons and type: 2017 suspensions and exclusions by school/campus. Retrieved from http://prod.static9.net.au/_/media/Files/RTI-172191–SDA-by-school-2017.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  9. Department of Education, Training and Employment. (2014). Performance insights: School disciplinary absences. Brisbane, QLD: Queensland State Government.Google Scholar
  10. Dutton Tillery, A., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., & Collins, A. S. (2010). General education teachers’ perceptions of behaviour management and intervention strategies. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions,12(2), 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edmund Rice Education Australia (2019). The Youth + Story. Retrieved from http://www.youthplus.edu.au/flexible-learning-centre-locations-4-2/. Accessed 1 Oct 2018.
  12. Education (Strengthening Discipline in State Schools) Amendment Act 2013 (QLD).Google Scholar
  13. Fabelo, T., Thompson, M. D., Plotkin, M., Carmichael, D., Marchbanks, M. P., III, & Booth, E. A. (2011). Breaking schools’ rules: A statewide study of how school discipline relates to students’ success and juvenile justice involvement. New York City: Council of State Governments Justice Center.Google Scholar
  14. Flannery, K. B., Guest, E. M., & Horner, R. H. (2010). Schoolwide. Principal Leadership,11(1), 38–43.Google Scholar
  15. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. E., Kosterman, R., Abbott, R., & Hill, K. G. (1999). Preventing adolescent health-risk behaviors by strengthening protection during childhood. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine,153(3), 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang-Brown, J., Trone, J., Fratello, J., & Daftary-Kapur, T. (2013). A generation later: What we’ve learned about zero tolerance in schools. New York City: Vera Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  17. McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2012). Alternative education sites and marginalised young people: ‘I wish there were more schools like this one’. International Journal of Inclusive Education,16(8), 843–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendez, R., & Sanders, S. G. (1981). An examination of in-school suspension: Panacea or Pandora’s box? NASSP Bulletin,65(441), 65–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merrett, R. (2015). Boosting student performance with data analytics. CIO, Autumn,2015, 8.Google Scholar
  20. Mills, M., & McGregor, G. (2016). Engaging students in engaging schools: Lessons from Queensland’s alternative education sector. Brisbane, QLD: YANQ.Google Scholar
  21. Noguera, P. (1995). Preventing and producing violence: A critical analysis of responses to school violence. Harvard Educational Review,65(2), 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Safran, S. P., & Oswald, K. (2003). Positive behavior supports: Can schools reshape disciplinary practices? Exceptional Children,69(3), 361–373.Google Scholar
  23. Simpson, W. D. (1968, January-February). The control of deviant behaviour in Australia: A police approach. Paper presented at the Seminar on the Control of Deviant Behaviour in Australia, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar
  24. Skiba, R. J. (2000). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
  25. Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. L. (1999). The dark side of zero tolerance: Can punishment lead to safe schools? The Phi Delta Kappan,80(5), 1–11.Google Scholar
  26. Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. L. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads: From zero tolerance to early response. Exceptional Children,66(3), 335–346.Google Scholar
  27. Solomon, B. G., Klein, S. A., Hintze, J. M., Cressey, J. M., & Peller, S. L. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-wide positive behaviour support: An exploratory study using single-case synthesis. Psychology in the Schools,49(2), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sugai, G., & Horner, R. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behaviour support. School Psychology Review,35(2), 245–259.Google Scholar
  29. Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Lewis, T. J., Nelson, C. M., et al. (2000). Applying positive behavioural support and functional behavioural assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behaviour Interventions,2(3), 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middlesex UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.All Saints Anglican SchoolMerrimacAustralia

Personalised recommendations