Advertisement

Interchange

, Volume 44, Issue 3–4, pp 311–331 | Cite as

Networks in Education: An Analysis of Selected Discourses

  • Sofia Branco Sousa
  • Alexandra Oliveira Doroftei
  • Helena Costa AraújoEmail author
Article

Abstract

‘Network’ is a fashionable and current term in every field of contemporary society and education is no exception. In this paper, the concept of network (and other associated concepts, such as partnership and collaboration) is reviewed. Such revision regards selected theoretical contributions and is explored in terms of the use of the concepts in legal documents and in the discourses of aldermen and educational officers from Portuguese municipalities, offering a critical and multi-layered perspective. The analysis reveals the various layers of the network concept, often appearing vague and diffuse. It is a floating signifier disputed by different discourses and embodied by different meanings. This, in turn, brings major research problems linked to the use of the concept of network in education.

Keywords

Networks Education Discourses 

References

  1. Antcliff, V., Saundry, R., & Stuart, M. (2012). Networks and social capital in the UK television industry: The weakness of weak ties. Human Relations, 60(2), 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araújo, H. C., Sousa, F., Loureiro, A., Costa, I., & Portela, J. (2013). Building local networking in education? Decision-makers’ discourses on school achievement and dropout in Portugal. In B. Boufoy-Bastick (Ed.), The international handbook of cultures of education policy. Comparative international issues in policy-outcome relationships. Achievement with family and community involvement ( Vol. I, pp. 155–185). Strasbourg: Analytrics.Google Scholar
  3. Berkowitz, S. D. (1982). An introduction to structural analysis. Toronto, ON: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  4. Burt, R. (1982). Toward a structural theory of action: Network models of social structure, perception and action. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Busher, H., & Hodgkindon, K. (1996). Co-operation and tension between autonomous schools: A study of inter-school networking. Educational Review, 48(1), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callon, M. (1999). Actor–Network Theory: The market test. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and after (pp. 181–195). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Carnwell, R., & Carson, A. (2008). The concepts of partnership and collaboration. In R. Carnwell & J. Buchanan (Eds.), Effective practice in health, social care and criminal justice: A partnership approach (pp. 3–21). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. I). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Castells, M. (2010). Preface. In M. Castells (Ed.), The information age: Economy, society and culture (pp. xvii–xxxvi). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Castells, M., Qiu, J. L., Fernandez-Ardeval, M., & Say, A. (2006). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chapman, C. (2008). Towards a framework for school-to-school networking in challenging circumstances. Educational Research, 50(4), 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapman, C., & Hadfield, M. (2010a). Supporting the middle tier to engage with school-based networks: Change strategies for influencing and cohering. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chapman, C., & Hadfield, M. (2010b). Realising the potential of school-based networks. Educational Research, 52(3), 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chapman, C., Lindsay, G., Muijs, D., Harris, A., Arneck, E., & Goodall, J. (2010). Governance, leadership and management in federations of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 21(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, L. C., Romney, A. K., & White, D. R. (Eds.). (1982). Research methods in social network analysis. Irvine, CA: School of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, C. M. (1999). Rethinking collaboration and partnership: A public policy perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(3–4), 274–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heath, S., Fuller, A., & Johnston, B. (2009). Chasing shadows: Defining network boundaries in qualitative social network analysis. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 645–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  19. Lamertz, K., & Aquino, K. (2004). Social power, social status and perceptual similarities of workplace victimisation: A social network analysis of stratification. Human Relations, 57(7), 795–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and after (pp. 15–25). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor–network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network Theory and after (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Leinhardt, S. (Ed.). (1977). Social networks: A developing paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Marsden, P. V., & Lin, N. (Eds.). (1982). Social structure and network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. O’Brien, M., Atkinson, A., Burton, D., Campbell, A., Qualter, A., & Varga-Atkins, T. (2009). Social inclusion and learning networks: A “wider notion of learning” or taking things in a different direction? Research Papers in Education, 24(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips, L. J., & Jorgensen, M. W. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Seddon, T., Billet, S., & Clemans, A. (2005). Navigating social partnerships: Central agencies–local networks. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(5), 567–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Townsend, A. (2013). Rethinking networks in education: Case studies of organisational development networks in Neoliberal contexts. Interchange, 43, 343–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vardaman, J. M., Amis, J. M., Dyson, B. P., & Wright, P. M. (2012). Interpreting change as controllable: The role of network centrality as self-efficacy. Human Relations, 65(7), 835–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legal document

  1. Ministério do Trabalho e da Solidariedade (MTS). (2002). Despacho Normativo [Normative Dispatch] number 8/2002. Diário da República: I Série-B, 36, 1086–1090.Google Scholar
  2. Ministério do Trabalho e da Solidariedade Social (MTSS). (2006). Decreto-Lei [Decree-Law] number 115/2006. Diário da República: I Série-A, 114, 4276–4282.Google Scholar
  3. Presidência do Conselho de Ministros (PCM). (1997). Resolução do Conselho de Ministros [Ministers’ Council Resolution] no. 197/97. Diário da República: I Série-B, 267, 6253–6255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofia Branco Sousa
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alexandra Oliveira Doroftei
    • 3
  • Helena Costa Araújo
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.CIPES - Centre for Research in Higher Education PoliciesUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.CIPES - Centre for Research in Higher Education PoliciesUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  3. 3.CIIE - Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Educativas, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da EducaçãoUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations