Advertisement

Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals

  • A. N. Guz
  • J. J. Rushchitsky
Article

The paper discusses the evaluation of scientific journals based on the Scopus database, information tools, and criteria. The SJR (SCImago Journal Rank) as the main criterion used by Scopus to evaluate scientific journals is considered. The Scopus and ISI systems are compared using information on the journal Prikladnaya Mekhanika (International Applied Mechanics), a number of world-known journals on mechanics, and some journals on natural sciences issued by the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Some comments and proposals are formulated. This paper may be considered as a follow up on papers published in Prikladnaya Mekhanika (International Applied Mechanics) in 2005–2009

Keywords

scientific publication evaluation Scopus database SJR criterion evaluation of mechanics-related journals evaluation of Ukrainian journals 

References

  1. 1.
    A. N. Guz and J. J. Rushchitsky, “On the problem of evaluation of scientific publications,” Int. Appl. Mech., 45, No. 3, 233–244 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ya. S. Yatskiv (ed.), Ukrainian Science in the Global Information Environment [in Ukrainian], Issue 1 (2008).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Adler, J. Ewing, and P. Taylor, Citation Statistics, Report of the Joint Committee on Quantitative Assessment of Research from IMU, ICIAM and IMS, 1–26 (2008).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. D. Batista, M. G. Campiteli, and O. Kinouchi, “Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?” Scientometrics, 68, No. 1, 179–189 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Brooks, “Evidence of complex citer motivations,” J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci., 37, No. 1, 34–36 (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Carey, M. G. Cowling, and P. G. Taylor, “Assessing research in the mathematical sciences,” Gazette Austral. Math. Soc., 34, No. 2, 84–89 (2007).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. E. Cozzens, “What do citations count? The rhetoric-first model,” Scientometrics, 15, No. 5–6, 437–447 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Garfield, “Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation,” Science, 178 (4060), 471–479 (1972).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. N. Guz, “On the evolution of the scientific information environment,” Int. Appl. Mech., 42, No. 11, 1203–1222 (2006).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. N. Guz and J. J. Rushchitsky, “Presentation of the monographs of the S. P. Timoshenko Institute of Mechanics to the scientific community,” Int. Appl. Mech., 42, No. 3, 247–290 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. N. Guz, J. J. Rushchitsky, and I. S. Chernyshenko, “On a modern philosophy of evaluating scientific publications,” Int. Appl. Mech., 41, No. 10, 1085–1091 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. N. Guz, J. J. Rushchitsky, and I. S. Chernyshenko, “On the six-volume series Uspekhi Mekhaniki (Advances in Mechanics),” Int. Appl. Mech., 43, No. 11, 1185–1194 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Martin and J. Irvin, “Assessing basic research,” Research Policy, 12, 61–90 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.S. P. Timoshenko Institute of MechanicsNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations