Advertisement

Careers in sustainability: an application of Social Cognitive Career Theory

  • Vanja Međugorac
  • Iva ŠverkoEmail author
  • Toni Babarović
Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Adolescents’ interests and goals for pursuing a career in the environmental, social and economic sustainability domains were explored within the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) framework. Respondents were secondary school graduates from Croatia who participated in an online study (N = 582). Using SEM, the SCCT model was confirmed as an adequate framework for conceptualizing the origins of career interests and goals in the three sustainability domains, especially with contextual supports and barriers included as both direct and indirect effects (via learning experiences, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations) on goals. Implications of results for career guidance practice and policies are discussed.

Keywords

Social Cognitive Career Theory Sustainability Green vocational guidance 

Resumé

Carrières professionnelles et développement durable: Une application de la théorie sociale cognitive de la carrière. Les intérêts et objectifs des adolescent·e·s quant à la poursuite d’une carrière dans les domaines de la durabilité environnementale, sociale et économique ont été explorés dans le cadre de la Théorie sociale cognitive de la carrière (TSCC). Les participant·e·s étaient des diplômé·e·s de l’enseignement secondaire de Croatie qui ont pris part à une étude en ligne (N = 582). En utilisant la modélisation en équations structurelles, il a été confirmé que le modèle TSCC constitue un cadre adéquat pour conceptualiser les origines des intérêts et objectifs de carrière dans les trois types de durabilité, en particulier lorsque les soutiens contextuels et les obstacles étaient inclus à la fois comme effets directs et indirects (via les expériences d’apprentissage, l’auto-efficacité et les résultats attendus) sur les buts. Les implications des résultats pour la pratique et les politiques d’orientation professionnelle sont discutées.

Zusammenfassung

Nachhaltige Laufbahnen: Eine Anwendung der Sozial-kognitiven Laufbahntheorie. Die Interessen und Ziele von Jugendlichen, die eine berufliche Laufbahn im Bereich der Umwelt-, Sozialen- oder Ökonomischen Nachhaltigkeit anstreben, wurden innerhalb des Modells der Sozial-kognitiven Laufbahntheorie (SCCT) exploriert. Die Befragten waren Kroatische Schüler mit Mittelschulabschluss, die an einer online Studie (N = 582) teilgenommen haben. Das SCCT Modell wurde mittels SEM als adäquates Rahmenmodell bestätigt, welches die Herkunft von beruflichen Interessen und Zielen auf drei Nachhaltigkeitsdimensionen, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf kontextbezogene Unterstützung und Hindernisse, inkludiert als direkter und indirekter Effekt (via Lernerfahrungen, Selbstwirksamkeit und Ergebniserwartungen) auf die Ziele. Implikationen der Ergebnisse für die Praxis der Laufbahnberatung und für Strategien werden diskutiert.

Resumen

Carreras en sostenibilidad: una aplicación de la teoria social cognitiva de la carrera. Los intereses y objectivos de los adolescentes por seguir una carrera en los dominios de la sostenibilidad ambiental, social y económica han sido explorados en el marco de la teoria social cognitiva de la carrera (SCCT). Los encuestados fueron gaduados de educación secundaria de Coracia que participaron en el estudio en línea (N = 582). Usando SEM, el modelo SCCT fue confirmado como un marco adecuado para conceptualizar los orígenes del interés y objetivos de carrera en tres dominios de la sostenibilidad, especiamente con apoyos y barreras contextuales incluídos como efectos directos e indirectos (a través de las experiencias de aprendizaje, la auto-eficacia y las expectativas de resultado) en los objetivos. Se discuten también las implicaciones de los resultados para las políticas y la práctica de la orientación para la carrera.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been fully supported by the Croatian Science Foundation under the Project Number 1229.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Stony Stratford, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Babarović, T., Šverko, I., & Crnko, I. (2017). Work values of Croatian adolescents: Value hierarchy and importance of family background. In V. Hedrih (Ed.), Work and family relations at the beggining of the 21st century—International thematic proceedings book (pp. 59–72). Serbia: Faculty of Philosophy, University of Niš.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science,9(3), 75–78.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter,41, 17–18.Google Scholar
  7. Dierdorff, E. C., Norton, J. J., Gregory, C. M., Rivkin, D., & Lewis, P. M. (2013). O*NET’s national perspective on the greening of the world of work. In A. H. Huffman & S. R. Klein (Eds.), Green organizations: Driving change with IO psychology (pp. 348–378). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Fouad, N. A., Smith, P. L., & Zao, K. E. (2002). Across academic domains: Extensions of the social-cognitive career model. Journal of Counseling Psychology,49(2), 164–171.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.49.2.164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fücks, R. (2015). Green growth, smart growth: A new approach to economics, innovation and the environment. London, UK: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  11. Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior,38(1), 48–71.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herr, E. L., & Niles, S. G. (1998). Career: Social action in behalf of purpose, productivity, and hope. In C. G. Lee & G. R. Walz (Eds.), Social action: A mandate for counsellors (pp. 117–156). Alexandria, VA: American Counselling Association.Google Scholar
  13. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  14. ILO. (2013). Sustainable development, decent work and green jobs. Report V of the International Labour Conference, 102nd Session. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.Google Scholar
  15. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis Report. In R. K. Pachauri, et al. (Eds.), Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (p. 151). Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.Google Scholar
  16. Irving, B. A., & Malik, B. (2004). Critical reflections on career education and guidance: Promoting social justice within a global economy. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth: Economics for a finite planet. London, UK: Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson, T. (2016). Beyond consumer capitalismFoundations for a sustainable prosperity. Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity Working Paper No 2. Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  19. Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika,34, 183–202.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kallis, G., Demaria, F., & D’Alisa, G. (2015). Introduction: degrowth. In G. D’Alisa, F. Demaria, & G. Kallis (Eds.), Degrowth: A vocabulary for a new era (pp. 1–17). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Langley, R., du Toit, R., & Herbst, D. L. (1992). Manual for the values scale. Pretoria, South Africa: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
  22. Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructs in career research: A measurement guide. Journal of Career Assessment,14(1), 12–35.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Brenner, B., Chopra, S. B., Davis, T., Talleyrand, R., & Suthakaran, V. (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology,48(4), 474–483.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior,45(1), 79–122.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling psychology,47(1), 36–49.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown and associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 255–311). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H., & Treistman, D. (2003). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology,50(4), 458.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.4.458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G., & Bieschke, K. J. (1991). Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science-based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology,38(4), 424–430.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.4.424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lent, R. W., Lopez, A. M., Lopez, F. G., & Sheu, H. B. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and the prediction of interests and choice goals in the computing disciplines. Journal of Vocational Behavior,73(1), 52–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lent, R. W., Paixão, M. P., Da Silva, J. T., & Leitão, L. M. (2010). Predicting occupational interests and choice aspirations in Portuguese high school students: A test of social cognitive career theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior,76(2), 244–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lopez, F. G., Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Gore, P. A. (1997). Role of social–cognitive expectations in high school students’ mathematics-related interest and performance. Journal of Counseling Psychology,44(1), 44–52.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.44.1.44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Myers, R. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Duxbury.Google Scholar
  33. Nevill, D. D., & Super, D. E. (1986). The Values Scale: Theory, application, and research (Manual). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  34. O*NET: The green economy. (n.d.). O*NET website. Retrieved August 18, 2018, from https://www.onetcenter.org/green.html.
  35. OECD. (2004). Career guidance and public policy: Bridging the gap. Retrieved August 25, 2018, from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/career-guidanceand-public-policy_9789264105669-en
  36. Plant, P. (1999). Fringe focus: Informal economy and green career development. Journal of Employment Counseling,36(3), 131–140.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.1999.tb01015.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Plant, P. (2014). Green guidance. In G. Arulmani, A. J. Bakshi, F. T. L. Leong, & A. G. Watts (Eds.), Handbook of career development: International perspectives (pp. 309–316). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rottinghaus, P. J., Larson, L. M., & Borgen, F. H. (2003). The relation of self-efficacy and interests: A meta-analysis of 60 samples. Journal of Vocational Behavior,62(2), 221–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00039-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schaub, M., & Tokar, D. M. (2005). The role of personality and learning experiences in social cognitive career theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior,66(2), 304–325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneider, F., Kallis, G., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production,18(6), 511–518.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sekulova, F., Kallis, G., Rodríguez-Labajos, B., & Schneider, F. (2013). Degrowth: From theory to practice. Journal of Cleaner Production,38, 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sheu, H., Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Miller, M. J., Hennessy, K. D., & Duffy, R. D. (2010). Testing the choice model of social cognitive career theory across Holland themes: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior,76, 252–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steg, L., & De Groot, J. (2010). Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model. British Journal of Social Psychology,49(4), 725–743.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X477745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sultana, R. G. (2014). Career guidance for social justice in neoliberal times. In G. Arulmani, A. J. Bakshi, F. T. L. Leong, & A. G. Watts (Eds.), Handbook of career development: International perspectives (pp. 317–333). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Super, D. E. (1995). Values: Their nature, assessment, and practical use. In D. E. Super & B. Šverko (Eds.), Life roles, values, and careers: International findings of the Work Importance Study (pp. 54–61). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  46. Super, D. E., & Šverko, B. (Eds.). (1995). Life roles, values, and careers: International findings of the work importance study. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Šverko, B. (1987). The structure of work values: A cross-national comparison. Acta Instituti Psychologici Universitatis Zagrabiensis,17, 23–29.Google Scholar
  48. Šverko, I., & Babarović, T. (2006). The validity of Holland’s theory in Croatia. Journal of Career Assessment,14(4), 490–507.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072706288940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Šverko, I., & Babarović, T. (2016). Integrating personality and career adaptability into vocational interest space. Journal of Vocational Behavior,94, 89–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  51. Tracey, T. J. G. (2002). Personal Globe Inventory: Measurement of the spherical model of interest and competence beliefs [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior,60, 113–172.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tracey, T. J. G. (2010). Development of an abbreviated Personal Globe Inventory using item response theory: The PGI-short. Journal of Vocational Behavior,76(1), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Uzzell, D. (2010). Critical comments for critical times: questioning psychology’s contribution to a sustainable society. In R. G. Mira & P. V. Marcote (Eds.), Sostenibilidad, Valores y Cultura Ambiental (pp. 113–126). Madrid, Spain: Ediciones Pirámide, S.A.Google Scholar
  54. Uzzell, D., & Räthzel, N. (2009). Transforming environmental psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology,29(3), 340–350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Verplanken, B., & Wood, W. (2006). Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing,25(1), 90–103.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.25.1.90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Warr, P. (2007). Work, happiness, and unhappiness. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  57. Watts, A. G. (1996). Socio-political ideologies in guidance. In R. Hawthorn, J. Killeen, & J. M. Kidd (Eds.), Rethinking careers education and guidance: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 225–233). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Williams, C. M., & Subich, L. M. (2006). The gendered nature of career related learning experiences: A social cognitive career theory perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior,69(2), 262–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang, Y., Kube, E., Wang, Y., & Tracey, T. J. G. (2013). Vocational interests in China: An evaluation of the Personal Globe Inventory-Short. Journal of Vocational Behavior,83(1), 99–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ivo Pilar Institute of Social SciencesZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.University College Dublin, College of BusinessDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations