Advertisement

The Italian adaptation of courage measure

  • Maria Cristina GinevraEmail author
  • Sara Santilli
  • Elisabetta Camussi
  • Paola Magnano
  • Dora Capozza
  • Laura Nota
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

This project developed and examined the psychometric properties of an Italian version of the Courage Measure, the reduced version composed of six items as suggested by Howard and Alipour (J Posit Psychol 9:449–459, 2014). Two studies were conducted with independent samples of Italian adults, providing psychometric support for the Italian adaptation of the inventory. This short scale is proposed as a useful tool in the fields of mental health and career counselling for assessing the propensity of individuals to behave courageously and to persist despite perceived risks. Scores may indicate potential to overcome personal challenges related to everyday life as well as career-related problems.

Keywords

Courage measure Psychometric evaluation Italian adults 

Résume

Développement et validation d’une version italienne de la mesure de courage Dans cette recherche, il est développé et examiné les propriétés psychométriques d’une version italienne de la mesure du courage, la version réduite composée de six items suggérée par Howard et Alipour (2014). Deux études ont été menées sur des échantillons indépendants d’adultes italiens, apportant une validité psychométrique à l’adaptation italienne de l’inventaire. Cette courte échelle est proposée comme un outil utile dans les domaines de la santé mentale et du conseil en orientation pour évaluer la propension des individus à se comporter avec courage et à persister malgré les risques perçus. Les scores peuvent indiquer un potentiel pour surmonter les défis personnels liés à la vie quotidienne ainsi que les problèmes liés à la carrière.

Zusammenfassung

Entwicklung und Validierung einer italienischen Version der “Courage Measure“Dieses Projekt entwickelte und untersuchte die psychometrischen Eigenschaften einer italienischen Version der “Courage Measure“, der reduzierten Version aus sechs Elementen, wie von Howard und Alipour (2014) vorgeschlagen. Zwei Studien wurden mit unabhängigen Stichproben italienischer Erwachsener durchgeführt, die psychometrische Belege für die italienische Anpassung des Inventars lieferten. Diese kurze Skala wird als nützliches Instrument in den Bereichen psychische Gesundheit und Berufsberatung vorgeschlagen, um die Neigung des Einzelnen zu bewerten, sich trotz der wahrgenommenen Risiken mutig zu verhalten und zu bestehen. Die Ergebnisse können auf ein Potenzial hinweisen, persönliche Herausforderungen im Zusammenhang mit dem Alltag sowie berufliche Probleme zu bewältigen.

Resumen

Desarrollo y validación de una versión italiana de laMedida de Coraje Este estudio desarrolló y examinó las propiedades psicométricas de una versión italiana de la Medida de Coraje, en concreto la versión reducida compuesta por seis ítems, siguiendo la sugerencia de Howard y Alipour (2014). Se realizaron dos estudios con muestras independientes de adultos italianos, proporcionando apoyo psicométrico para la adaptación italiana del inventario. Esta escala, en su versión corta, se propone como una herramienta útil en los campos de la salud mental y la orientación profesional, con el propósito de evaluar la tendencia de las personas a comportarse con audacia y persistir a pesar de los riesgos percibidos. Las puntuaciones obtenidas pueden indicar el potencial para superar los desafíos personales relacionados con la vida cotidiana, así como los problemas vinculados al desarrollo de la carrera profesional.

Notes

References

  1. Beck, U. (2015). Emancipatory catastrophism: What does it mean to climate change and risk society? Current Sociology, 63(1), 75–88.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114559951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobbio, A., & Manganelli, A. M. (2011). Measuring social desirability responding. A short version of Paulhus’ BIDR 6. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 18(2), 117–135.  https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM.18.2.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, R., & Middendorf, J. (1996). The underestimated role of temporal comparison: A test of the life-span model. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 325–331.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9714011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, F. F. (2007) Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464–504.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Maggio, I., Ginevra, M. C., Nota, L., & Soresi, S. (2016). Development and validation of an instrument to assess future orientation and resilience in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 51, 114–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fingfeld, D. L. (1999). Courage as a process of pushing beyond the struggle. Qualitative Health Research, 9(6), 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fusco, L., Sica, L. S., Boiano, A., Esposito, S., & Aleni Sestito, L. (2019). Future orientation, resilience and vocational identity in southern Italian adolescents. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 19, 63–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-018-9369-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ginevra, M. C., Magnano, P., Lodi, E., Annovazzi, C., Camussi, E., Patrizi, P., & Nota, L. (2018). The role of career adaptability and courage on life satisfaction in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 62, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ginevra, M. C., Sgaramella, T. M., Ferrari, L., Nota, L., Santilli, S., & Soresi, S. (2017). Visions about future: A new scale assessing optimism, pessimism, and hope in adolescents. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 17(2), 187–210.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-016-9324-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hannah, S. T., Sweeney, P. J., & Lester, P. B. (2010). The courageous mind-set: A dynamic personality system approach to courage. In C. S. Pury, S. J. Lopez, C. S. Pury, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The psychology of courage: Modern research on an ancient virtue (pp. 125–148). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howard, M. C., & Alipour, K. K. (2014). Does the courage measure really measure courage? A theoretical and empirical evaluation. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 449–459.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.910828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howard, M. C., & Cogswell, J. S. (2018). The left side of courage: Three exploratory studies on the antecedents of social courage. The Journal of Positive Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1426780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howard, M. C., Farr, J. L., Grandey, A. A., & Gutworth, M. B. (2017). The Creation of the Workplace Social Courage Scale (WSCS): An investigation of internal consistency, psychometric properties, validity, and utility. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(6), 673–690.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9463-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional fit criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kilmann, R. H., O’Hara, L. A., & Strauss, J. P. (2010). Developing and validating a quantitative measure of organizational courage. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), 15–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9125-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Konter, E., & Ng, J. (2012). Development of sport courage scale. Journal of Human Kinetics, 33, 163–172.  https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-012-0055-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Magnano, P., Paolillo, A., Platania, S., & Santisi, G. (2017). Courage as a potential mediator between personality and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 13–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Muris, P. (2009). Fear and courage in children: Two sides of the same coin? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 486–490.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9271-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Muris, P., Mayer, B., & Schubert, T. (2010). “You might belong in gryffinder”: Children’s courage and its relationships to anxiety symptoms, big five personality traits, and sex roles. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 41, 204–213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-009-0161-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Norton, P. J., & Weiss, B. J. (2009). The role of courage on behavioral approach in a fear-eliciting situation: A proof-of-concept pilot study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 212–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nota, L., Ferrari, L., Sgaramella, T. M., & Soresi, S. (2015, October). Strumenti di assessment per l’orientamento con adulti [Assessment measures for vocational guidance with adults]. Paper presented at seminar ‘Diversity and work’, University of Padova, Padova.Google Scholar
  25. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rate, C. R. (2010). Defining the features of courage: A search for meaning. In C. L. S. Pury & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The psychology of courage: Modern research on an ancient virtue (pp. 47–66). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reibling, N., Beckfield, J., Huijts, T., Schmidt-Catran, A., Thomson, K. H., & Wendt, C. (2017). Depressed during the depression: Has the economic crisis affected mental health inequalities in Europe? Findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the determinants of health. European Journal of Public Health, 27(1), 1–54.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career adapt-abilities scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 661–673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, M. S., & Gray, S. W. (2009). The courage to challenge: A new measure of hardiness in LGBT adults. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 21(1), 73–89.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720802494776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Snyder, C. R., Lopez, S. J., & Pedrotti, J. T. (2010). Positive psychology: The scientific and practical explorations of human strengths. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Sovet, L., Annovazzi, C., Ginevra, M. C., Kaliris, A., & Lodi, E. (2018). Life design in adolescence: The role of positive psychological resources. In V. Cohen-Scali, J. Rossier, & L. Nota (Eds.), New perspectives on career counseling and guidance in Europe building careers in changing and diverse societies (pp. 23–37). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  34. Testoni, I., Milo, V., Ronconi, L., Feltrin, A., Zamperini, A., Rodelli, M., & … Cillo, U. (2017). Courage and representations of death in patients who are waiting for a liver transplantation. Cogent Psychology, 4, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2017.1294333.
  35. Villella, R. (2013). Corso di coraggio per bambini paurosi [Course on courage for fearful children]. Roma, Italy: San Paolo S.r.l.Google Scholar
  36. Watson, S. F. (2003). Courage and caring: Step up to your next level of nursing excellence. Patient Care Management, 19(4), 4–6.Google Scholar
  37. Woodard, C. R. (2004). Hardiness and the concept of courage. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 56, 173–185.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.56.3.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodman, D. (2011). Young people and the future: Multiple temporal orientations shaped in interaction with significant others young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 19, 111–128.  https://doi.org/10.1177/110330881001900201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woodward, C., & Pury, C. (2007). The construct of courage: Categorization and measurement. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 59(2), 135–147.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.59.2.135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied PsychologyUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Faculty of Human and Social SciencesKore UniversityEnnaItaly

Personalised recommendations