Advertisement

Assessing students’ perception of parental career-related support: development of a new scale and a new taxonomy

  • Diego Boerchi
  • Semira Tagliabue
Article

Abstract

The object of this study was to assess students' perceptions of their parents’ career-related behaviours and their influence on the students’ behaviours. In study 1 (528 students), we developed the SIL Scale (support, interference and lack of engagement), a nine-item questionnaire applied to educational and job contexts. In study 2 (1204 students), we tested a person-centred approach and developed a new model called the WID Types (willing, involved and in difficulty), which identifies three clusters of students. The associations between the clusters and career choice difficulties, level of career exploration and stage of the vocational choice confirmed its validity.

Keywords

Career choice Parental career behaviour Vocational indecision 

Résumé

Evaluation de la perception qu’ont les étudiants du soutien parental concernant leur carrière: développement d’une nouvelle échelle et d’une taxonomie. L’objet de cette étude est d’évaluer la perception qu’ont les étudiants des comportements de leurs parents vis-à-vis de la carrière et de son effet sur leurs propres comportements. Dans l’étude 1 (528 étudiants), nous développons l’échelle SIL (soutien, interférence, manque d’engagement), un questionnaire à 9 items appliqué aux contextes de la formation et du travail. Dans l’étude 2 (1’204 étudiants), nous testons une approche centrée sur la personne et développons un nouveau modèle appelé le WID Types (prêt, impliqué et en difficulté), qui identifie trois groupes d’étudiants. Les liens entre ces groupes et les difficultés de choix de carrière, le niveau d’exploration professionnelle et l’étape du choix vocationnel confirment sa validité.

Zusammenfassung

Wie nehmen Studenten die elterliche Unterstützung in Laufbahn- und Karrierefragen wahr? Entwicklung einer neuen Messskala und Taxonomie. Der Gegenstand dieser Studie war das Erfassen von 1) der Wahrnehmung der Studenten des Elternverhaltens im Bezug auf Karriere und 2) deren Auswirkung (Wahrnehmung) auf das Verhalten der Studenten. In Studie 1 (528 Studenten) entwickelten wir die SIL-Skala (support - Unterstützung, interference - Einmischung, lack of engagement – mangelnde Beteiligung), ein im Bildungs- und Berufsbereich anwendbarer Neun-Item Fragebogen. In Studie 2 (1204 Studenten) testeten wir einen personenzentrierten Ansatz und entwickelten ein neues Modell, WID Types genannt (willing - gewillt, involved - beteiligt, und in difficulty – in Schwierigkeit), welches drei Cluster von Studenten identifiziert. Die Zusammenhänge zwischen den Cluster und Berufswahlschwierigkeiten, Berufserforschungs-Levels und Berufswahletappen, bestätigten die Validität dieses Modells.

Resumen

La evaluación de la percepción de los estudiantes acerca del apoyo a la Carrera. Desarrollo de una nueva escala y taxonomía. El objeto de este estudio fue evaluar la percepción de los estudiantes sobre los comportamientos relacionados con la Carrera y su efecto en los comportamientos de los estudiantes. En el estudio 1 (528 estudiantes) desarrollamos la escala SIL (apoyo, interferencia, falta de involucración), un cuestionario de nueve ítems aplicado a contextos educativos y de trabajo. En el estudio 2 (1204 estudiantes), testamos una aproximación centrada en la persona y desarrollamos un Nuevo modelo denominado de tipos WID (WID types: willing, involved, and in difficulty; voluntad, involucración, en dificultad) que identificó tres clusters de estudiantes. Las asociaciones entre los clusters y las dificultades en la elección de Carrera, los niveles de exploración de la Carrera y el estadio de elección vocacional, confirmaron su validez.

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wottke, W. (2003). Amos 5.0 update to the user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Small Waters Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumrind, D. (1978). Parental disciplinary patterns and social competence in children. Youth & Society, 9, 239–267.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X7800900302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Constantine, M. G., Wallace, B. C., & Kindaichi, M. M. (2005). Examining contextual factors in the career decision status of African American adolescents. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 307–319.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705274960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutrona, C., & Russel, D. (1987). The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dietrich, J., & Kracke, B. (2009). Career-specific parental behaviors in adolescents’ development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 109–119.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707313206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietrich, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Parental involvement and adolescents' career goal pursuit during the post-school transition. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 121–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farmer, H. S., Keane, J., Rooney, G., Vispoel, W., Harmon, L., Lerner, B., et al. (1981). Career Motivation and Achievement Planning (C-MAP). (Available from Helen S. Farmer, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois, Room 226 Education Building, 1310 S. 6th Street, Champaign, IL 61820).Google Scholar
  12. Feldt, R. C., Ferry, A., Bullock, M., Camarotti-Carvalho, A., Collingwood, M., Eilers, S., & Woelfel, C. (2010). Factorial structure of the career decision scale: Incremental validity of the five-factor domains. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42, 235–245.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175609354575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferrari, L. (2005). Il ruolo del supporto familiare percepito e dell’autoefficacia sull’indecisione professionale [The role of perceived family support and self-efficacy on vocational indecision]. GIPO Giornale Italiano di Psicologia dell’Orientamento, 6, 21–32.Google Scholar
  14. Flores, L. Y., & O’Brien, K. M. (2002). The career development of Mexican American adolescent women: A test of social cognitive theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 14–27.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fouad, N. A., Cotter, E. W., Fitzpatrick, M. E., Kantamneni, N., Carter, L., & Bernfeld, S. (2010). Development and validation of the family influence scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 276–291.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710364793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gore, P. A., Jr. (2000). Cluster analysis. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 297–321). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guan, Y., Wang, F., Liu, H., Ji, Y., Jia, X., Fang, Z., & Li, C. (2015). Career-specific parental behaviors, career exploration and career adaptability: A three-wave investigation among Chinese undergraduates. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 95–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gushue, G. V., Scanlan, K. R. L., Pantzer, K. M., & Clarke, C. P. (2006). The relationship of career decision-making self-efficacy, vocational identity, and career exploration behavior in African American high school students. Journal of Career Development, 33, 19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845305283004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howard, K. A. S., & Walsh, M. E. (2010). Conceptions of career choice and attainment: Developmental levels in how children think about careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 143–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kelly, K. R., & Lee, W. (2002). Mapping the domain of career decision problems. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 302–326.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kracke, B. (1997). Parental behaviors and adolescents’ career exploration. The Career Development Quarterly, 45, 341–350.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb00538.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kracke, B., & Noack, P. (2005). Die Rolle der Eltern für die Berufsorientierung von Jugendlichen [The role of parents in adolescents’ career development]. In B. H. Schuster, H.-P. Kuhn, & H. Uhlendorff (Eds.), Entwicklung in sozialen Beziehungen (pp. 169–193). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.  https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110508185-009
  24. Laplante, B., Coallier, J., Sabourin, S., & Martin, F. (1994). Dimensionality of the career decision scale: Methodological, cross-cultural, and clinical issues. Journal of Career Assessment, 2, 19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715580565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lease, S. H., & Dahlbeck, D. T. (2009). Parental influences, career decision-making attributions, and self-efficacy: Differences for men and women? Journal of Career Development, 36, 95–113.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845309340794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, J. H., & Mun, E. M. (2011). The effects into juvenile career decision making self-efficacy by parental career support. The Journal of Career Education Research, 24(1), 173–188.Google Scholar
  27. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36–49.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002a). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 255–311). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Talleyrand, R., McPartland, E. B., Davis, T., Chopra, S. B., … Chai, C.-M. (2002b). Career choice barriers, supports, and coping strategies: College students’ experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 61–72.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marcionetti, J., & Rossier, J. (2016). The parental career-related behaviors (PCB) questionnaire: Italian validation. TPM—Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 23, 347–363.  https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM23.3.6.Google Scholar
  31. Martin, F., Sabourin, S., Laplante, B., & Coallier, J. (1991). Diffusion, support, approach, and external barriers as distinct theoretical dimensions of the career decision scale: Disconfirming evidence? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 38, 187–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(91)90026-I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. McWhirter, E. H., Hackett, G., & Bandalos, D. L. (1998). A causal model of the educational plans and career expectations of Mexican American high school girls. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 166–181.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558402250345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Metheny, J., & McWhirter, E. H. (2013). Contributions of social status and family support to college students’ career decision self-efficacy and outcome expectations. Journal of Career Assessment, 21, 378–394.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712475164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159–179.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mortimer, J. T., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Holmes, M., & Shanahan, M. J. (2002). The process of occupational decision making: Patterns during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 439.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2002.1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Osipow, S. H. (1994). The career decision scale: How good does it have to be? Journal of Career Assessment, 2, 15–18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279400200102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Osipow, S. H., Carney, C. G., & Barak, A. (1976). A scale of educational-vocational undecidedness: A typological approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9, 233–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(76)90081-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paa, H. K., & McWhirter, E. H. (2000). Perceived influences on high school students’ current career expectations. The Career Development Quarterly, 49, 29–44.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2000.tb00749.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raymund, P., Garcia, J. M., Lloyd, S., Restubog, D., Toledano, L. S., Tolentino, L. R., & Rafferty, A. E. (2012). Differential moderating effects of student- and parent-related support in the relationship between learning goal orientation and career decision-making self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 20, 22–33.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711417162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheffé, H. (1959). The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Schultheiss, D. E. P., Kress, H., Manzi, A., & Glasscock, J. (2001). Relational influences in career development: A qualitative inquiry. The Counseling Psychologist, 29, 214–239.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000001292003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482–497.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.3.482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Trusty, J. (1998). Family influences on educational expectations of late adolescents. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 260–270.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner, S. L., Alliman-Brissett, A., Lapan, R. T., Udipi, S., & Ergun, D. (2003). The career-related parent support scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 36, 83–94.Google Scholar
  46. Turner, S. L., Steward, J. C., & Lapan, R. T. (2004). Family factors associated with sixth-grade adolescents’ math and science career interests. Career Development Quarterly, 53, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Von Eye, A., & Bogat, G. A. (2006). Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly-Journal of Developmental Psychology, 52, 390–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whiston, S. C., & Keller, B. K. (2004). The influences of the family of origin on career development: A review and analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 493–568.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000004265660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang, J., Yuen, M., & Chen, G. (2015). Career-related parental support for vocational school students in china. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 37, 346–354.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-015-9248-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations