Advertisement

Personality traits’ effects on self-efficacy and outcome expectations for high school major choice

  • Dikla Brown
  • Rachel Gali Cinamon
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The current study focuses on the contribution of the Big Five personality traits to the development of self-efficacy and outcome expectations regarding selection of a high school major among 368 Israeli adolescents (M age = 16.07, SD = 0.41). Structural equation analyses showed that higher levels of conscientiousness and extraversion and lower neuroticism contributed to higher self-efficacy. In contrast, higher levels of conscientiousness and neuroticism and lower extraversion contributed to higher outcome expectations. These findings expand our understanding regarding personality characteristics serving as antecedents of self-efficacy and outcome expectations and sets important implications for career interventions with adolescents.

Keywords

Decision making self efficacy Adolescents Big Five personality traits 

Résumé

Les effets des traits de personnalité sur le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle et les attentes de résultat concernant le choix de l’option principale au lycée. Cette étude se focalise sur la contribution des traits de personnalité du Big Five au développement du sentiment d’efficacité personnelle et des attentes de résultat concernant la sélection de l’option principale au lycée auprès de 368 adolescents israéliens (M âge = 16.07, SD = 0.41). Des analyses d’équations structurelles ont montré que des niveaux plus élevés de caractère consciencieux et d’extraversion, et des niveaux plus faibles de névrosisme, contribuaient à un sentiment d’efficacité personnelle plus élevé. Par contre, des niveaux plus élevés de caractère consciencieux et de névrosisme, et des niveaux plus faibles d’extraversion, contribuaient à des attentes de résultat plus élevées. Ces résultats élargissent notre compréhension de la manière dont les caractéristiques de la personnalité agissent en tant qu’antécédents sur le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle et les attentes de résultats. Ils ont également des implications importantes concernant les interventions de carrière auprès des adolescents.

Zusammenfassung

Die Effekte von Persönlichkeitseigenschaften auf Selbstwirksamkeit und Ergebnis-Erwartungen für die Wahl von High School Fächern. Die vorliegende Studie beschäftigt sich mit dem Beitrag der Big Five Persönlichkeitseigenschaften für die Entwicklung von Selbstwirksamkeit und Ergebnis-Erwartungen bezüglich der Wahl von High School Fächern bei 368 israelischen Jugendlichen (M alter = 16.07, SD = 0.41). Strukturgleichungsanalysen konnten zeigen, dass höhere Level von Gewissenhaftigkeit und Extraversion, sowie geringerer Neurotizismus einen Beitrag zu höherer Selbstwirksamkeit leisten. Dagegen führten höhere Level von Gewissenhaftigkeit und Neurotizismus, sowie geringere Extraversion zu einer niedrigeren Ergebnis-Erwartung. Diese Ergebnisse erweitern unser Verständnis von Persönlichkeitseigenschaften als Antezedenzien für Selbstwirksamkeit und Ergebnis-Erwartungen und lassen wichtige Implikationen für Karriereinterventionen bei Jugendlichen ableiten.

Resumen

Efectos de los rasgos de personalidad sobre la autoeficacia y las expectativas de resultado para la elección de especialidad en la Escuela Secundaria. El estudio actual se centra en la contribución de los de los Cinco Grandes rasgos de personalidad con el desarrollo de la autoeficacia y expectativas de resultados con respecto a la selección de una escuela importante de secundaria entre 368 adolescentes israelíes (M age = 16.07, SD = 0.41). Los análisis de ecuaciones estructurales mostró que los niveles más altos de conciencia y la extraversión y neuroticismo menor contribuyeron a una mayor auto-eficacia. Por el contrario, los niveles más altos de conciencia y neuroticismo y extraversión baja contribuyeron a las expectativas de resultados superiores. Estos hallazgos amplían nuestra comprensión respecto a las características de personalidad que actúa como antecedentes de las expectativas de autoeficacia y de resultados y establece importantes implicaciones para las intervenciones de la carrera con los adolescentes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). Amos 16.0 user’s guide. Crawfordville: Amos Development.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (2006). Going global with social cognitive theory: From prospect to paydirt. In S. I. Donaldson, D. E. Berger, & K. Pezdek (Eds.), Applied psychology: New frontiers and rewarding careers (pp. 53–79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Betz, N. (2006). Basic issues and concepts in the career development and counseling of women. In W. B. Walsh & M. J. Heppner (Eds.), Handbook of career counseling for women (2nd ed., pp. 45–74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Betz, N., & Voyten, K. K. (1997). Efficacy and outcome expectations influence career exploration and decidedness. Career Development Quarterly, 46, 179–189. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.1997.tb01004.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, D., & Cinamon, R. G. (in press). Choosing a high school major: An important stage in the career development of Israeli adolescents. Journal of Career Assessment. doi: 10.1177/1069072714553083.
  6. Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., Telander, K., & Tramayne, S. (2011). Social cognitive career theory, conscientiousness, and work performance: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 81–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.11.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bullock-Yowell, E., Andrews, L., & Buzzetta, M. E. (2011). Explaining career decision-making self-efficacy: Personality, cognitions, and cultural mistrust. Career Development Quarterly, 59, 400–411. doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2011.tb00967.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Cinamon, R. G. (2010). Decision making process regarding a high school: The contribution of social support, SES and gender factors. Unpublished manuscript, School of Education, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 343–359. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Etzion, D., & Lasky, S. (1998). Personality Traits Questionnaire (Big Five) (Unpublished manuscript). Faculty of Management, Institute of Business Research, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.Google Scholar
  12. Feldt, R. C., Ferry, A., Bullock, M., Camarottu-Carvalho, A., Collingwood, M., Eilers, S., … Nurre, E. (2011). Personality, career indecision, and college adjustment in the first semester. Individual Differences Research, 9(2), 107–114.Google Scholar
  13. Feldt, R. C., & Woelfel, C. (2009). Five-factor personality domains, self efficacy, career-outcome expectations, and career indecision. College Student Journal, 43(2), 429–437.Google Scholar
  14. Fort, I., Pacaud, C., & Gilles, P. Y. (2015). Job search intention, theory of planned behavior, personality and job search experience. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 15, 57–74. doi: 10.1007/s10775-014-9281-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fouad, N. A., Cotter, E. W., & Kantamneni, N. (2009). The effectiveness of a career decision-making course. Journal of Career Assessment, 17, 338–347. doi: 10.1177/1069072708330678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gati, I., & Saka, N. (2001). High school students’ career-related decision-making difficulties. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79, 331–340. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01978.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartman, R. O., & Betz, N. E. (2007). The five-factor model and career self-efficacy: General and domain-specific relationships. Journal of Career Assessment, 15, 145–161. doi: 10.1177/1069072706298011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartung, P. J. (2010). Barrier or benefit? Emotion in life-career design. Symposium presented at the 118th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Diego, CA. doi: 10.1037/e602812010-001.
  19. Hirschi, A. (2010). Vocational interests and career goals: Development and relations to personality in middle adolescence. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 223–238. doi: 10.1177/1069072710364789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirschi, A., & Herrmann, A. (2013). Assessing difficulties in career decision-making among Swiss adolescents with the German My Vocational Situation Scale. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72, 33–42. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. I. (1991). The “Big Five” Inventory—versions 5a and 54 [Technical Report]. Berkeley: University Institute of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  22. Klem, L. (2000). Structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding MORE multivariate statistics (pp. 227–260). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  23. Larson, L. M., Wei, M., Wu, T. F., Borgen, F. H., & Bailey, D. C. (2007). Discriminating among educational majors and career aspirations in Taiwanese undergraduates: The contribution of personality and self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 395–408. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.54.4.395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2008). Social cognitive career theory and subjective well-being in the context of work. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 6–21. doi: 10.1177/1069072707305769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36–49. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In D. Brown (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 255–311). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Lent, R. W., Sheu, H. B., Singley, D., Schmidt, J. A., Schmidt, L. C., & Gloster, C. S. (2008). Longitudinal relations of self efficacy to outcome expectations, interests, and major choice goals in engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lounsbury, J. W., Hutchens, T., & Loveland, J. M. (2005). An investigation of Big Five personality traits and career decidedness among early and middle adolescents. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 25–39. doi: 10.1177/1069072704270272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, J. E., & Williams-Diehm, K. (2013). Student engagement and leadership of the transition planning process. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 36, 43–50. doi: 10.1177/2165143413476545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456–1468. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Boyle, E. H, Jr, & Williams, L. J. (2011). Decomposing model fit: Measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1–12. doi: 10.1037/a0020539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ojeda, L., Piña-Watson, B., Castillo, L. G., Castillo, R., Khan, N., & Leigh, J. (2012). Acculturation, enculturation, ethnic identity, and conscientiousness as predictors of Latino boys’ and girls’ career decision self-efficacy. Journal of Career Development, 39, 208–228. doi: 10.1177/0894845311405321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Page, J., Bruch, M. A., & Haase, R. F. (2008). Role of perfectionism and five-factor model traits in career indecision. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 811–815. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saka, N., Gati, I., & Kelly, K. R. (2008). Emotional and personality-related aspects of career-decision-making difficulties. Journal of Career Assessment, 16, 403–424. doi: 10.1177/1069072708318900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Skorikov, V. (2007). Continuity in adolescent career preparation and its effects on adjustment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 8–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2006.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stringer, K., Kerpelman, J., & Skorikov, V. (2012). A longitudinal examination of career preparation and adjustment during the transition from high school. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1343–1354. doi: 10.1037/a0027296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tabak, F., Nguyen, N., Basuray, T., & Darrow, W. (2009). Exploring the impact of personality on performance: How time-on-task moderates the mediation by self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 823–828. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tang, M., Pan, W., & Newmeyer, M. D. (2008). Factors influencing high school students’ career aspirations. Professional School Counseling, 11, 285–295. doi: 10.5330/PSC.n.2010-11.285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wille, B., Beyers, W., & De Fruyt, F. (2012). A transactional approach to person-environment fit: Reciprocal relations between personality development and career role growth across young to middle adulthood. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81, 307–321. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2012.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yadama, G. N., & Pandey, S. (1995). Effect of sample size on goodness of fit indices in structural equation models. Journal of Social Services Research, 20, 49–70. doi: 10.1300/J079v20n03_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationTel Aviv UniversityTel Aviv-YafoIsrael

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options