Advertisement

Employees’ willingness to participate in work-related learning: a multilevel analysis of employees’ learning intentions

  • Eva Kyndt
  • Patrick Onghena
  • Kelly Smet
  • Filip Dochy
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The current study focuses on employees’ learning intentions, or the willingness to undertake formal work-related learning. This cross-sectional survey study included a sample of 1,243 employees that are nested within 21 organisations. The results of the multilevel analysis show that self-directedness in career processes, time management, employability, organisational support and growth possibilities, prior participation, and initial level of education are significant positive predictors of an employee’s learning intentions when overall differences in learning intention between organisations are taken into account.

Keywords

Learning intention Work-related learning employees Multilevel analysis 

Résumé

Volonté des employé-e-s à participer à une formation continue: Une analyse multi-niveau des intentions d’apprentissage des employé-e-s. Dans la présente étude, nous nous sommes focalisés sur les intentions d’apprentissage des employé-e-s, c’est-à-dire, leur volonté d’entreprendre une formation formelle liée au travail. Cette étude transversale a porté sur un échantillon de 1′245 employé-e-s de 21 entreprises. Les résultats de l’analyse multi-niveau indiquent que l’auto-directivité (self-directedness) dans les processus de carrière, la gestion du temps, l’employabilité, le soutien organisationnel, ainsi que les possibilités d’évolution une participation préalable et le niveau initial de formation sont des prédicteurs positifs significatifs des intentions de se former des employé-e-s lorsque l’ensemble des différences globales dans les intentions d’apprentissage entre les entreprises sont prises en considération.

Zusammenfassung

Die Bereitschaft von Arbeitnehmern an arbeitsbezogenem Lernen teilzunehmen: Eine Mehrebenenanalyse der Lernabsicht von Mitarbeitern. In der aktuellen Studie konzentrieren wir uns auf Lernabsichten der Mitarbeiter, also die Bereitschaft zu formalem arbeitsbezogenem Lernen. Diese Querschnittsstudie beinhaltet eine Stichprobe von 1.243 Mitarbeitern, die innerhalb von 21 Organisationen eingebettet sind. Die Ergebnisse der Mehrebenenanalyse zeigen, dass Selbststeuerung in Karriere Prozessen, Zeitmanagement, Beschäftigungsfähigkeit, organisatorische Unterstützung und Wachstumsmöglichkeiten, vorherige Teilnahme und ursprüngliches Bildungsniveau signifikant positive Prädiktoren für die Lernabsicht eines Mitarbeiters sind, wenn die Gesamtunterschiede in der Lernabsicht zwischen den Organisationen berücksichtigt werden.

Resumen

La disposición del empleado a participar en formación relacionada con su trabajo: un análisis multinivel de la voluntad de aprendizaje del empleado. El presente estudio gira en torno a la voluntad de aprendizaje del empleado, es decir, a su mayor o menor disposición a participar en procesos y cursos de formación relacionados con su trabajo. Se trata de una encuesta trans-seccional sobre una muestra de 1243 trabajadores pertenecientes a 21 empresas y organizaciones distintas. Los resultados del análisis multinivel demuestran que, en términos generales y salvando las diferencias particulares entre empresas, los siguientes factores actúan significativamente como predictores positivos de la voluntad de aprendizaje del empleado: grado de autocontrol de los procesos curriculares, gestión del tiempo, empleabilidad, nivel de apoyo por parte de la empresa, posibilidades de promoción, participación previa en actividades formativas, y nivel de formación del empleado.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Baert, H., De Rick, K., & Van Valckenborgh, K. (2006). Towards the conceptualisation of learning climate. In R. Vieira de Castro, A. V. Sancho, & P. Guimaraes (Eds.), Adult education: New routes in a new landscape (pp. 87–111). Braga: University of Minho.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, R. A. (2001). Public sector training participation: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Training and Development, 5, 136–152. doi: 10.1111/1468-2419.00128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernaards, C. A., & Jennrich, R. I. (2005). Gradient projection algorithms and software for arbitrary rotation criteria in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 676–696. doi: 10.1177/0013164404272507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boeren, E., Nicaise, I., & Baert, H. (2010). Theoretical models of participation in adult education: The need for an integrated model. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29, 45–61. doi: 10.1080/1554480X.2012.655887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth, A. L. (1991). Job-related formal training: Who receives it and what is it worth? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 53, 281–293. doi: 10.1111/j.14680084.1991.mp53003004.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Britton, B., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 405–410. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, P., Hesketh, A., & Williams, S. (2003). Employability in a knowledge driven economy. Journal of Education and Work, 16, 107–126. doi: 10.1080/1363908032000070648.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, T. S., & McCracken, M. (2009). Building a bridge of understanding. How barriers to training become barriers to training transfer. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33, 492–512. doi: 10.1108/03090590910974392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, D. C., & Auster, E. (2003). Factors contributing to the professional development of reference librarians. Library and Information Science Research, 25, 265–286. doi: 10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00030-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organisational Research Methods, 4, 62–83. doi: 10.1177/109442810141004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Churchill, G., Ford, N., & Walker, O. (1974). Measuring the job satisfaction of industrial salesmen. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 254–260. doi: 10.2307/3151140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darkenwald, G. G., & Valentine, T. (1986). Measuring the social environment of adult education classrooms. In Paper presented at the Adult Education Research Conference. Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  15. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. Greenhalgh, C., & Mavrotas, G. (1994). The role of career aspirations and financial constraints in individual access to vocational training. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 579–604.Google Scholar
  17. Harrell, F. E. (2012). Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous. R package version 3.9-3. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc.
  18. Harris, R. I. D. (1999). The determinants of work-related training in Britain in 1995 and the implications of employer size. Applied Economics, 31, 451–463. doi: 10.1080/000368499324165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hurtz, G. M., & Williams, K. J. (2009). Attitudinal and motivational antecedents of participation in voluntary employee development activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 635–653. doi: 10.1037/a0014580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Illeris, K. (2006). Lifelong learning and the low-skilled. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25, 15–28. doi: 10.1080/02601370500309451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ito, J. K., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2005). Does supporting employees’ career adaptability lead to commitment, turnover or both? Human Resource Management, 44, 5–19. doi: 10.1002/hrm.20037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kyndt, E., & Baert, H. (2013). Antecedents of employees’ involvement in work-related learning: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 83, 273–313. doi: 10.3102/0034654313478021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Baert, H. (2013). The learning intentions of low-qualified employees: A multilevel approach. Adult Education Quarterly, 63, 165–189. doi: 10.1177/0741713612454324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kyndt, E., Govaerts, N., Dochy, F., & Baert, H. (2011). The learning intention of low-qualified employees: A key for participation in lifelong learning and continuous training. Vocations and Learning, 4, 211–229. doi: 10.1007/s12186-011-9058-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mallon, M., & Walton, S. (2005). Career and learning: The ins and outs of it. Personnel Review, 34, 468–487. doi: 10.1108/00483480510599789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maurer, T. J., & Tarulli, B. A. (1994). Investigation of perceived environment, perceived outcome, and person variables in relationship to voluntary development activity by employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 3–14. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maurer, T. J., Weiss, E. M., & Barbeite, F. G. (2003). Model of involvement in work-related learning and development activity: The effects of individual, situational, motivational, and age variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 707–724. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Noe, R. A. (1996). Is career management related to employee development and performance? Journal of Organisational Behavior, 17, 119–133. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199603)17:2<119:AID-JOB736>3.0.CO;2-O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nurita, J., Fatimah, P., Noor Akmar, O., & Hanifah, M. (2010). Factors influencing internal and external employability of employees. Business and Economics Journal, BEJ-11.Google Scholar
  30. Oosterbeek, H. (1996). A decomposition of training probabilities. Applied Economics, 28, 799–805. doi: 10.1080/1350485011050700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peeters, M. A. G., & Rutte, C. G. (2005). Time management behaviour as a moderator for the job demand–control interaction. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 64–75. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.1.64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modelling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.009.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pierce, H. R., & Maurer, T. J. (2009). Linking employee development activity, social exchange and organisational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Training and Development, 13, 139–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2009.00323.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar D., & The R Development Core Team. (2012). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-104. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
  35. Proost, K., Van Ruysseveldt, J., & Van Dijke, M. (2012). Coping with unmet expectations: Learning opportunities as a buffer against emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 21, 7–27. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2010.526304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pryor, B. W. (1990). Predicting and explaining intention to participate in continuing education: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Adult Education Quarterly, 40, 146–157. doi: 10.1177/0001848190040003003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raemdonck, I. (2006). Self-directedness in learning and career processes. A study in lower-qualified employees in Flanders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Gent, Belgium.Google Scholar
  38. Raemdonck, I., Tillema, H., de Grip, A., Valcke, M., & Segers, M. (2012). Does self-directedness in learning and careers predict the employability of low-qualified employees. Vocations and Learning, 5, 137–151. doi: 10.1007/s12186-011-9072-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rau, R. (2006). Learning opportunities at work as a predictor for recovery and health. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 15, 158–180. doi: 10.1080/13594320500513905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.
  41. Renkema, A. (2006). Individual learning accounts: A strategy for lifelong learning? Journal of Workplace Learning, 18, 384–394. doi: 10.1108/13665620610682107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Revelle, W. (2012). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University, Evanston. Retrieved from http://personality-project.org/r/psych.manual.pdf.
  43. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organisation: The contribution of perceived organisational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825–836. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36.Google Scholar
  45. Rowold, J., & Shilling, J. (2006). Career-related continuous learning: Longitudinal predictive power of employees’ job and career attitudes. Career Development International, 11, 489–503. doi: 10.1108/13620430610692917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sala-Velasco, M. (2009). Beyond lectures and tutorials: Formal on-the-job training received by young European university graduates. Research in Economics, 63, 200–211. doi: 10.1016/j.rie.2009.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sanders, J., Oomens, S., Blonk, R. W. B., & Hazelzet, A. (2011). Explaining lower-educated workers’ training intentions. Journal of Workplace Learning, 23, 402–416. doi: 10.1108/13665621111154412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schäfer, J., Opgen-Rhein, R., Zuber, V., Ahdesmäki, M., Duarte Silva, P. A., & Strimmer, K. (2012). corpcor: Efficient estimation of covariance and (partial) correlation. R Package Version 1.6.3. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=corpcor.
  49. Spector, P. E. (1985). Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the job satisfaction survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 693–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tharenou, P. (1997). Organisational, job and personal predictors of employee participation in training and development. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 111–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01220.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tharenou, P. (2001). The relationship of training motivation to participation in training and development. Journal of Occupational & Organisational Psychology, 74, 599–621. doi: 10.1348/096317901167541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3, 130–154. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van der Sluis, L. E. C., & Poell, R. F. (2003). The impact on career development of learning opportunities and learning behavior at work. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14, 159–179. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Veldhoven, M., Meijman, T. F., Broersen, J. P. J., & Fortuin, R. J. (1997). Handleiding VBBA. Onderzoek naar de beleving van psychosociale arbeidsbelasting en werkstress met behulp van de vragenlijst beleving en beoordeling van de arbeid. [Manual VBBA. Research into the perception of psychosocial workload and work stress by means of the questionnaire on the perception and appraisal of work.] Amsterdam: Stichting Kwaliteitsbeoordeling Bedrijfsgezondszorg.Google Scholar
  55. Warr, P., & Birdi, K. (1998). Employee age and voluntary development activity. International Journal of Training and Development, 2, 190–204. doi: 10.1111/1468-2419.00047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zoogah, D. B. (2010). Why should I be left behind? Employees’ perceived relative deprivation and participation in development activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 159–173. doi: 10.1037/a0018019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Kyndt
    • 1
  • Patrick Onghena
    • 2
  • Kelly Smet
    • 1
  • Filip Dochy
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Research on Professional Learning & Development, and Lifelong Learning, Corporate Training and Lifelong Learning (K.U.Leuven)University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Methodology of Educational Sciences Research GroupUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options