Advertisement

The moderating role of gender in shaping entrepreneurial intentions: Implications for vocational guidance

  • Afsaneh Bagheri
  • Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This study examines the relationships among attitude toward entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, subjective norms, social valuation of entrepreneurship, and entrepreneurial intentions and how gender affects the relationships. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the responses obtained from 719 Malaysian students across five universities. The results suggest gender significantly moderates the relationship between students’ entrepreneurial intention and its antecedents. While entrepreneurial attitude and self-efficacy had greater effects on males’ intentions to become entrepreneurs, entrepreneurial attitude and subjective norms had stronger impact on females’ entrepreneurial intentions. Furthermore, social valuation of entrepreneurship had an indirect relationship with entrepreneurial intention through self-efficacy and subjective norms.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial intention Entrepreneurial attitude Self-efficacy 

Résumé

Le rôle modérateur du genre dans le façonnement des intentions entrepreneuriales: Implications pour le conseil et l’orientation. Cette étude examine les relations entre les attitudes envers l’entreprenariat, le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle entrepreneurial, les normes subjectives, la valeur sociale de l’entreprenariat et les intentions entrepreneuriales, ainsi que la manière dont le genre influence ces relations. Des modèles d’équations structurales sont utilisés pour analyser les réponses de 719 étudiants Malaisiens provenant de cinq universités. Les résultats suggèrent que le genre modère de manière significative la relation entre l’intention entrepreneuriale des étudiants et ses antécédents. Alors que les attitudes entrepreneuriales et le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle ont un plus grand effet sur les attitudes entrepreneuriales des hommes, les attitudes entrepreneuriales et les normes subjectives ont davantage d’impact sur les attitudes entrepreneuriales des femmes. De plus, la valeur sociale de l’entrepreneuriat est indirectement liée aux intentions entrepreneuriales au travers du sentiment d’efficacité personnelle et des normes subjectives.

Zusammenfassung

Die moderierende Rolle von Geschlecht in der Gestaltung von unternehmerischen Absichten: Implikationen für die Berufsberatung. Diese Studie untersucht die Beziehungen zwischen der Einstellung zum Unternehmertum, unternehmerischer Selbstwirksamkeit, subjektiven Normen, sozialer Bewertung von Unternehmertum, unternehmerischen Absichten und wie das Geschlecht die Beziehungen beeinflusst. Für die Analyse der 719 malaysischen Studenten von fünf Universitäten wurden Strukturgleichungsmodelle verwendet. Die Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass das Geschlecht die Beziehung zwischen der unternehmerischer Absicht der Studenten und deren Prädiktoren signifikant moderiert. Während die unternehmerische Einstellung und Selbstwirksamkeit eine größere Auswirkung auf die Absicht Unternehmer zu werden bei den Männer aufzeigte, wiesen unternehmerische Einstellung und subjektive Normen eine stärkere Auswirkung auf die unternehmerischen Absichten der Frauen auf. Darüber hinaus hatte die soziale Bewertung des Unternehmertums vermittelt durch Selbstwirksamkeit und die subjektive Normen eine indirekte Beziehung mit der unternehmerischen Absicht.

Resumen

El efecto del género en la formación del espíritu emprendedor: Implicaciones para la orientación profesional. Este trabajo estudia las relaciones entre la actitud frente al emprendedurismo, la autosuficiencia emprendedora, la subjetividad, la valoración del emprendedurismo a nivel social y el propio espíritu emprendedor, así como el efecto del género sobre dichas relaciones. Se analizaron las respuestas de 719 estudiantes malayos de cinco universidades distintas mediante un procedimiento de modelización por ecuación estructural (structural equation modeling). Los resultados obtenidos parecen indicar que el género influye de manera significativa en la relación entre la actitud previa o tradicional de los estudiantes frente al emprendedurismo y su espíritu emprendedor. En el caso de los hombres, el espíritu emprendedor y la confianza en uno mismo determinaron mayoritariamente la voluntad de emprender. En el caso de las mujeres, los factores determinantes resultaron ser el espíritu emprendedor y las barreras subjetivas. Además de esto, se detectó una influencia indirecta entre la valoración social del emprendedurismo y la voluntad emprendedora, a través de los factores de autoconfianza y subjetividad.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of self control. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38, 9–44. doi: 10.1177/0149206311410606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa, S. D., Gerhardt, M. W., & Kickul, J. R. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13, 86–104. doi: 10.1177/10717919070130041001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BarNir, A., Watson, W. E., & Hutchins, H. M. (2011). Mediation and moderated mediation in the relationship among role models, self-efficacy, entrepreneurial career intention, and gender. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 270–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00713.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7, 461–483. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0703_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, J. C., & Sequeira, J. M. (2007). Prior family business exposure as international influence and entrepreneurial intent: A theory of planned behaviour approach. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1090–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carsrud, A., Krueger, N., Brännback, M., Kickul, J., & Elfving, J. (2007). The family business pipeline: Where norms and modeling make a difference. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http://proceedings.aom.org/site/misc/archive.xhtml.
  10. Chen, C., Greene, P., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers? Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295–316. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00029-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, Y., & He, Y. (2011). The impact of strong ties on entrepreneurial intention: An empirical study based on the mediating role of self-efficacy. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship, 3, 147–158. doi: 10.1108/17561391111144573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng, M. Y., Chan, W. S., & Mahmood, A. (2009). The effectiveness of entrepreneurship education in Malaysia. Education and Training, 51, 555–566. doi: 10.1108/00400910910992754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeClercq, D., Benson, H., & Martin, B. (2012). The roles of learning orientation and passion for work in the formation of entrepreneurial intention. International Small Business Journal, 1–25. doi: 10.1177/0266242611432360.
  14. DePillis, E., & Reardon, K. K. (2007). The influence of personality traits and persuasive messages on entrepreneurial intention: A cross-cultural comparison. Career Development International, 12, 382–396. doi: 10.1108/13620430710756762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Douglas, E. J. (2013). Reconstructing entrepreneurial intentions to identify predisposition for growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 633–651. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elfving, J., Brännback, M., & Carsrud, A. (2009). Toward a contextual model of entrepreneurial intentions. In A. Carsrud & M. Brännback (Eds.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind: Opening the black box (pp. 23–33). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: A new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30, 701–720. doi: 10.1108/03090590610715022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferreira, J. J., Raposo, M. L., Rodrigues, R. J., Dinis, A., & Paço, A. D. (2012). A model of entrepreneurial intention: An application of the psychological and behavioural approaches. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 19, 424–440. doi: 10.1108/14626001211250144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Firdaus, A., Hamali, J., Rahman Deen, A., Saban, G., & Abg Abdurahamn, A. Z. (2009). Developing a framework of success of Bumiputera entrepreneurs. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 3, 8–24. doi: 10.1108/17506200910943652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitzsimmons, J. R., & Douglas, E. J. (2011). Interaction between feasibility and desirability in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 431–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guerrero, M., Rialp, J., & Urbano, D. (2008). The impact of desirability and feasibility on entrepreneurial intentions: A structural equation model. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 4, 35–50. doi: 10.1007/s11365-006-0032-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., & Bhawe, N. M. (2008). The effect of gender stereotype assimilation and reactance on entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1053–1061. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., Wastiand, S. A., & Sikdar, A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 397–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00296.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, M. L., & Gibson, S. G. (2008). Examining the entrepreneurial attitudes of US business students. Education and Training, 50, 568–581. doi: 10.1108/00400910810909036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., Barbosa, S. D., & Whitcanack, L. (2009). Intuition versus analysis? Testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 439–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00298.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kickul, J., Wilson, F., & Marlino, D. (2008). Are misalignments of perceptions and self-efficacy causing gender gaps in entrepreneurial intentions among our nation’s teens? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15, 321–335. doi: 10.1108/14626000810871709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Krueger, N. F., & Kickul, J. (2006). So you thought the intentions model was simple? Navigating the complexities and interactions of cognitive style, culture, gender, social norms, and intensity on the pathways to entrepreneurship. Paper presented at USASBE conference, Tuscon, AZ. Retrieved from http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/sbi/2006/pdffiles/papers/cases/051.pdf.
  30. Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411–432. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liñán, F. (2008). Skill and value perceptions: How do they affect entrepreneurial intentions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4, 257–272. doi: 10.1007/s11365-008-0093-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lope Pihie, Z. A., & Bagheri, A. (2013). Self-Efficacy and Entrepreneurial Intention: The mediation effect of self-regulation. Vocations and Learning, 6, 385–401. doi: 10.1007/s12186-013-9101-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mastura, J., & Abdul Rashid, A. A. (2008). Entrepreneurship education in developing country, exploration on its necessity in the construction programme. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 6, 178–189. doi: 10.1108/17260530810891306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matlay, H. (2006). Researching entrepreneurship and education Part 2: What is entrepreneurship education and does it matter? Education and Training, 48, 704–718. doi: 10.1108/00400910610710119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mauer, R., Neergaard, H., & Linstad, A. K. (2009). Self-efficacy: Conditioning the entrepreneurial mindset. In A. Carsrud & M. Brännback (Eds.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind: Opening the black box (pp. 233–256). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McGee, J. E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S. L., & Sequeira, J. M. (2009). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 965–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00304.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Proyer, R. T., Sidler, N., Weber, M., & Ruch, W. (2012). A multi-method approach to studying the relationship between character strengths and vocational interests in adolescents. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 12, 141–157. doi: 10.1007/s10775-012-9223-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scherer, R. F., Adams, J. S., Carley, S. S., & Wiebe, F. A. (1989). Role model performance effects on development of entrepreneurial career preference. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13, 53–71.Google Scholar
  39. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. doi: 10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schumpeter, J. A. (1965). Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. In H. G. Aitken (Ed.), Explorations in enterprise (pp. 336–348). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 566–591. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Teoh, W. M. Y., & Chong, S. C. (2008). Improving women entrepreneurs in small and medium enterprises in Malaysia: Policy recommendations. Communications of the IBIMA, 2, 31–38. Retrieved from http://www.ibimapublishing.com/journals/CIBIMA/volume2/v2n5.pdf.
  43. Tyszka, T., Cieślik, J., Domurat, A., & Macko, A. (2011). Motivation, self-efficacy, and risk attitudes among entrepreneurs during transition to a market economy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2011.01.011.Google Scholar
  44. Verheul, I., Thurik, R., Grilo, I., & van der Zwan, P. (2012). Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self-employment: Gender and the entrepreneurial personality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 325–341. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2011.02.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watchravesringkan, K., Hodges, N. N., Yurchisin, J., Hegland, J., Karpova, E., Marcketti, S., et al. (2013). Modeling entrepreneurial career intentions among undergraduates: An examination of the moderating role of entrepreneurial knowledge and skills. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 41, 325–342. doi: 10.1111/fcsr.12014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. White, R. E., Thornhill, S., & Elizabeth, H. (2007). A biosocial model of entrepreneurship: The combined effects of nurture and nature. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 28, 451–466. doi: 10.1002/job.432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 31, 387–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00179.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson, F., Marlino, D., & Kickul, J. (2004). Our entrepreneurial future: Examining the diverse attitudes and motivations of teen across gender and ethnic identity. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 177–198.Google Scholar
  49. Wu, S., & Wu, L. (2008). The impact of higher education on entrepreneurial intentions of university students in China. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15, 752–774. doi: 10.1108/14626000810917843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zellweger, T., Sieger, P., & Halter, F. (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Career choice intentions of students with family business background. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 521–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Hills, G. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1265–1272. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Afsaneh Bagheri
    • 1
  • Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of EntrepreneurshipUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Faculty of Educational StudiesUniversity Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options