Advertisement

Non-participation in guidance: An opportunity for development?

  • Rie Thomsen
Article

Abstract

This article discusses how new opportunities for guidance can emerge from an analysis of the interplay between the participation (or lack of participation) of the individuals in career guidance, and the career guidance practitioner’s response. The article suggests critical psychology as a framework for career guidance research and presents the analytical categories of “participation” and “conduct of everyday life” as means to analyse the dialectical relationship between participant and structure, as well as individual and society. Finally, it is argued that flexible career practices that adapt to the needs of participants have the potential effect of greater social justice.

Keywords

Career guidance in communities Critical psychology Individualisation 

Résumé

La non-participation dans le conseil en orientation: une occasion de développement. Cet article discute la manière dont de nouvelles opportunités pour l’orientation peuvent émerger de l’analyse de l’interaction entre la participation (ou la non- participation) des individus dans le conseil en orientation et la réponse des praticiens. L’article suggère d’utiliser la psychologie critique comme cadre pour la recherche en orientation et présente les catégories analytiques de “participation” et “conduites de la vie de tous les jours” comme des moyens d’analyser la relation dialectique entre le participant et la structure, aussi bien qu’entre l’individu et la société. Pour finir, il est soutenu que des pratiques de carrière flexibles qui s’adaptent aux besoins des participants ont potentiellement l’effet d’accroître la justice sociale.

Zusammenfassung

Nicht-Teilnahme an beruflicher Beratungeine Chance zur Weiterentwicklung? Dieser Beitrag erörtert, welche neuen Chancen zur Gestaltung von Beratungsangeboten sich ergeben können, wenn man das Zusammenspiel der Teilnahme (oder fehlender Teilnahme) von Menschen an Beratungsangeboten untersucht. Als Bezugsrahmen für die Beratungsforschung wird die Kritische Psychologie vorgeschlagen, und die analytischen Kategorien der ‚Teilnahme‘und der ‚alltäglichen Lebensführung‘werden als ein Mittel präsentiert, um die dialektische Beziehung zwischen Teilnehmenden und Strukturen, ebenso wie zwischen Individuum und Gesellschaft zu analysieren. Daraus wird die Schlussfolgerung gezogen, dass flexible Beratungspraktiken, die sich den Bedürfnissen der Teilnehmenden anpassen, potenziell auch einen Effekt für mehr soziale Gerechtigkeit haben.

Resumen

La no participación en Orientación-Una oportunidad para el Desarrollo. Este artículo explica cómo nuevas oportunidades para la orientación pueden surgir a partir de un análisis de la interacción entre la participación (o no participación) de los individuos en la orientación profesional, y la respuesta del propio orientador. El artículo sugiere la Psicología Crítica como marco para la investigación de la orientación profesional y presenta las categorías analíticas de “participación” y “conducta de la vida cotidiana” como medio para analizar la relación dialéctica entre los participantes y la estructura, así como el individuo y la sociedad. Por último se argumenta que la práctica flexible de las carreras que se adaptan a las necesidades de los participantes consigue el potencial efecto de una mayor justicia social.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank two anonymous reviewers for their feedback and productive comments.

References

  1. Borg, T. (2003). Livsførelse i hverdagen under rehabilitering (Conduct of life in everyday during rehabilitation). PhD Thesis, University of Aarhus, Institut for Filosofi Center for Sundhed, Menneske og Kultur nr 2, Aarhus, Denmark.Google Scholar
  2. Dreier, O. (2008). Psychotherapy in everyday life. Learning in doing: Social cognitive, and computational perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. ELGPN (2010). Lifelong guidance policies: Work in progress. A report on the work of the European Lifelong Guidance Policy Network 20082010. Jyväskylä, Finland: Author. Retrieved from http://ktl.jyu.fi/img/portal/18649/ELGPN_report_2008-10.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2013.
  4. ELGPN (2012). European lifelong guidance policies: Progress report 20112012. A report on the work of the European Lifelong Guidance Policy Network 20112012. Saarijärvi, Finland: Author. Retrieved from http://ktl.jyu.fi/img/portal/23229/ELGPN_2011-12_Progress_Report_web.pdf?cs=1350649704. Accessed 1 April 2013.
  5. Højholt, C. (2001). Samarbejde om børns udvikling (Collaboration on the development of children). Copenhagen, Denmark: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  6. Højholt, C. (2006). Knowledge and professionalism—From the perspectives of children? International Journal of Critical Psychology, 2006, 81–106.Google Scholar
  7. Holzkamp, K. (1972). Kritische Psychologie. Vorbereitende Arbeiten (Critical psychology. Preparatory works). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Fischer.Google Scholar
  8. Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie (Foundations of psychology). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Campus.Google Scholar
  9. Holzkamp, K. (1991). Societal and individual life processes. In C. W. Tolman & W. Maiers (Eds.), Critical psychology. Contributions to an historical science of the subject (pp. 50–65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holzkamp, K. (1993). Lernen. Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung (Learning. Subject-scientific foundations). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Campus.Google Scholar
  11. Holzkamp, K. (1998). Daglig livsførelse som subjektvidenskabeligt grundkoncept (Conduct of everyday life as subject scientific category). Nordiske Udkast, 26(2), 3–31.Google Scholar
  12. Holzkamp, K. (2013). Psychology: Social self-understanding on the reasons for action in the conduct of everyday life. In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject—Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 233–341). Basingstoke Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kousholt, K. (2009). Evalueret—Deltagelse i folkeskolens evalueringspraksis (Dialectical approaches in recent Danish critical psychology). Copenhagen, Denmark: Aarhus University.Google Scholar
  14. Kousholt, D. (2011). Researching family through the everyday lives of children across home and day care in Denmark. ETHOS Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology, 39, 98–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1352.2010.01173.x.Google Scholar
  15. Kousholt, K., & Thomsen, R. (2012). Dialectical approaches in recent Danish critical psychology. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 2012(1), 30. Retrieved from http://www.discourseunit.com/arcp10/Denmark%20359-390.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2013.
  16. Kvale, S. (1995). The social construction of validity. Qualitative Inquiry, 1, 19–40. doi: 10.1177/107780049500100103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lave, J. (2011). Apprenticeship in critical ethnographic practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mackrill, T. (2007). Using a cross-contextual qualitative diary design to explore client experiences of psychotherapy. Counselling and psychotherapy research: Linking research with practice, 7, 233–239. doi: 10.1080/14733140701722455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mackrill, T. (2008). Exploring psychotherapy clients independent strategies for change while in therapy. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 36, 441–453. doi: 10.1080/03069880802343837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McMahon, M., & Watson, M. (2007). An analytical framework for career research in the post-modern era. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7, 169–179. doi: 10.1007/s10775-007-9126-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mørck, L. L., & Nissen, M. (2001). Vilde forskningsprocesser: kritik, metoder og læring i socialt arbejde (Wild research processes: critique, methods and learning in social work). Nordiske Udkast, 29(1), 33–60.Google Scholar
  22. Morin, A. (2008). Learning together: A child perspective on educational arrangements of special education. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 15(1), 27–37.Google Scholar
  23. Osterkamp, U., & Schraube, E. (2013). Introduction: Klaus Holzkamp and the development of psychology from the standpoint of the subject. In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject—Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 1–18). Basingstoke Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Perry, J. C. (2009). A combined social action, mixed methods approach to vocational guidance efficacy research. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 9, 111–123. doi: 10.1007/s10775-009-9158-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Plant, P. (2008). On the shopfloor: Guidance in the workplace. In J. Athanasou & R. Van Esbroeck (Eds.), International handbook of career guidance (pp. 265–281). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plant, P., & Thomsen, R. (2012). Career guidance in Denmark: Social control in a velvet glove. Orientación y Sociedad, 11, 1–17.Google Scholar
  27. Prilleltensky, I. (2003). Understanding, resisting, and overcoming oppression: Toward psychopolitical validity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 195–201. doi: 10.1023/A:1023043108210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberts, K. (2005). Social class and career guidance. In B. A. Irving & B. Malik (Eds.), Critical reflections on career education and guidance (pp. 130–142). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schiersmann, C., Ertelt, B.-J., Katsarov, J., Mulvey, R., Reid, H., & Weber, P. (2012). NICE Handbook for the academic training of career guidance and counselling professionals. Heidelberg, Germany: University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  30. Schraube, E., & Osterkamp, U. (2013). Psychology from the standpoint of the subject—selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp. Basingstoke Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Shotter, J. (1992). Getting in touch: The meta-methodology of a postmodern science of mental life. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Psychology and postmodernism (pp. 58–73). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  33. Stead, G. B., Perry, J. C., Munka, L. M., Bonnett, H. R., Shiban, A. P., & Care, E. (2012). Qualitative research in career development: Content analysis from 1990 to 2009. International Journal of Educational and Vocational Guidance, 12, 105–122. doi: 10.1007/s10775-011-9196-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sultana, R. G. (2011). Lifelong guidance, citizen rights and the state: Reclaiming social contract. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 39, 179–186. doi: 10.1080/03069885.2010.547055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sultana, R. G. (2014). Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will? Troubling the relationship between career guidance and social justice. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 14. doi: 10.1007/s10775-013-9262-y.
  36. Thomsen, R. (2012a). Career guidance in communities. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Thomsen, R. (2012b). Guidance in communities: A way forward? Journal of the National Institute for Career Education and Counselling, 28, 39–45.Google Scholar
  38. Thomsen, R. (2013). Career guidance on the move: Developing guidance in new places. Journal of the National Institute for Career Education and Counselling, 31, 9–15.Google Scholar
  39. Thomsen, R., Skovhus, R. B., & Buhl, R. (2013). At vejlede i fællesskaber og grupper (Practising career guidance in communities and groups). Valby, Denmark: Schultz.Google Scholar
  40. Usher, R. (2005). Subjects, networks and positions: Thinking educational guidance differently. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 33, 397. doi: 10.1080/03069880500179640.
  41. Valach, L., & Young, R. A. (2009). Interdisciplinarity in vocational guidance: an action theory perspective. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 9, 85–99. doi: 10.1007/s10775-009-9156-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vilhjálmsdóttir, G., Dofradóttir, A. G., & Kjartansdóttir, G. B. (2011). Voice of users. Promoting quality of guidance for adults in the Nordic countries. Retrieved from http://www.nordvux.net/Portals/0/_dokumenter/2013/voice_of_users.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2014.
  43. Vondracek, F. W., Ferreira, J. A. G., & Santos, E. J. (2010). Vocational behavior and development in times of social change: New perspectives for theory and practice. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 10, 125–138. doi: 10.1007/s10775-010-9176-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Westergaard, J. (2009). Effective group work with young people. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationAarhus UniversityCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations