Advertisement

Cryptanalysis of the Efficient Controlled Quantum Secure Direct Communication and Authentication by Using Four Particle Cluster States Protocol

  • Zhihao LiuEmail author
  • Hanwu ChenEmail author
Article

Abstract

It shows that there are some serious security issues in the controlled quantum secure direct communication (CQSDC) with authentication protocol based on four particle cluster states via quantum one-time pad and local unitary operations. Some information of the identity strings of the receiver and the controller can be stolen without being detected by the intercept-selectively-measure-resend (ISMR) attack. Furthermore, an eavesdropper (Eve) can eavesdrop on some information of the secret message that the sender transmits. In addition, the receiver can obtain half of information about the secret message without any active attack and the permission of the controller, which is not allowed in a secure CQSDC protocol. The receiver can take the ISMR attack to obtain more information about the secret message without the permission of the controller. If running the protocol many times, the identity strings of the receiver and the controller can be completely acquired by Eve. Finally, the original CQSDC protocol is improved to a secure one.

Keywords

Controlled quantum secure direct communication Cluster state Intercept-selectively-measure-resend attack 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61502101 and 61871120), and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. BK20171458) and the Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. XYDXX-003).

References

  1. 1.
    Deng, F.G., Long, G.L., Liu, X.S.: Two-step quantum direct communication protocol using the einstein-podolsky-rosen pair block. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042317 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deng, F.G., Long, G.L.: Secure direct communication with a quantum one-time pad. Phys. Rev. A 69, 052319 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, C., Deng, F.G., Li, Y.S., Liu, X.S., Long, G.L.: Quantum secure direct communication with high-dimension quantum superdense coding. Phys. Rev. A 71, 044305 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Long, G.L., Deng, F.G., Wang, C., Li, X.H.: Quantum secure direct communication and deterministic secure quantum communication. Front. Phys. China 2, 251–272 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, Z.H., Chen, H.W., Liu, W.J., Xu, J., Li, Z.Q.: Deterministic secure quantum communication without unitary operation based on high-dimensional entanglement swapping. Sci. China-inf. Sci. 55, 360–367 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu, Z.H., Wu, C., Liu, W.J., Xu, J., Wang, D., Li, Z.Q.: Quantum secure direct communication with optimal quantum superdense coding by using general four-qubit states. Quantum Inf. Process. 12, 587–599 (2013)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu, Z.H., Chen, H.W., Wang, D., Xue, X.L.: Classical-operation-based deterministic secure quantum communication. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53, 2118–2129 (2014)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li, X.H.: Quantum secure direct communication. Acta Phys. Sin. 64, 0160307 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Tang, C.J.: Multiparty controlled quantum secure direct communication using greenberger-horne-zeilinger state. Opt. Commun. 266, 732–737 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hassanpour, S., Houshmand, M.: Efficient controlled quantum secure direct communication based on GHZ-like states. Quantum Inf. Process. 14, 739–753 (2015)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tan, X.Q., Zhang, X.Q.: Controlled quantum secure direct communication by entanglement distillation or generalized measurement. Quantum Inf. Process. 15, 2137–2154 (2016)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nanvakenari, M., Houshmand, M.: An efficient controlled quantum secure direct communication and authentication by using four particle cluster states. Int. J. Quantum. Inf. 14, 1750002 (2017)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhong, J., Liu, Z., Xu, J.: Analysis and improvement of an efficient controlled quantum secure direct communication and authentication protocol. CMC 57, 621–633 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, Z.-H., Chen, H.-W.: Cryptanalysis and improvement of quantum broadcast communication and authentication protocol with a quantum one-time pad. Chin. Phys. B 25, 080308 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, Z., Chen, H., Liu, W.: Cryptanalysis of controlled quantum secure direct communication and authentication protocol based on five-particle cluster state and quantum one-time pad. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55, 4564–4576 (2016)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Computer Network and Information Integration (Southeast University)Ministry of EducationNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations