Advertisement

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 1094–1102 | Cite as

A New Proposal to Redefine Kilogram by Measuring the Planck Constant Based on Inertial Mass

  • Yongmeng Liu
  • Dawei Wang
Article

Abstract

A novel method to measure the Planck constant based on inertial mass is proposed here, which is distinguished from the conventional Kibble balance experiment which is based on the gravitational mass. The kilogram unit is linked to the Planck constant by calculating the difference of the parameters, i.e. resistance, voltage, velocity and time, which is measured in a two-mode experiment, unloaded mass mode and the loaded mass mode. In principle, all parameters measured in this experiment can reach a high accuracy, as that in Kibble balance experiment. This method has an advantage that some systematic error can be eliminated in difference calculation of measurements. In addition, this method is insensitive to air buoyancy and the alignment work in this experiment is easy. At last, the initial design of the apparatus is presented.

Keywords

Planck constant Redefine the kilogram unit Inertial mass 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61575056 and 91536224), China National Key Research and Development Plan (Grant No. 2016YFF0200102), Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2012ZA77001) and Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (Grant No. F2016012).

The authors would like to thank Mr. Zhengkun LI from National Institute of Metrology of China for valuable advice on this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Fischer, J., Ullrich, J.: The new system of units. Nat. Phys. 12(1), 4–7 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fang, H., et al.: A watt balance based on a simultaneous measurement scheme. Metrologia 51(2), S80–S87 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim, D., et al.: Design of the KRISS watt balance. Metrologia 51(2), S96–S100 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baumann, H., et al.: Design of the new METAS watt balance experiment Mark II. Metrologia 50(3), 235–242 (2013)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas, M., et al.: First determination of the Planck constant using the LNE watt balance. Metrologia 52(2), 433–443 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bartl, G., et al.: A new sup28/supSi single crystal: counting the atoms for the new kilogram definition Metrologia (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuramoto, N., et al.: Determination of the Avogadro constant by the XRCD method using a sup28/supSi-enriched sphere. Metrologia (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robinson, I.A., Schlamminger, S.: The watt or Kibble balance: a technique for implementing the new SI definition of the unit of mass. Metrologia 53(5), A46–A74 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P, K.B.: A measurement of the gyromagnetic ratio of the proton by the strong field method Atomic Masses and Fundamental Constants. In: J. H. Sanders and A. H. Wapstra. New York, Plenum, pp. 545–551 (1976)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, Z., et al.: The joule balance in NIM of China. Metrologia 51(2), S25 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schlamminger, S., K.-Y.C., Wagner, T.A., Gundlach, J.H., Adelberger, E.G.: Test of the equivalence principle using a rotating torsion balance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(4), 041101 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mills, I.M., et al.: Redefinition of the kilogram, ampere, kelvin and mole: a proposed approach to implementing CIPM recommendation 1 (CI-2005). Metrologia 43(3), 227–246 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, S., et al.: A proposal for absolute determination of inertial mass by measuring oscillation periods based on the quasi-elastic electrostatic force. Metrologia 50(1), 9–14 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fu, Z., et al.: Analysis of balance beam deformation in the inertial mass measurement experiment. Measurement Science and Technology (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    BIMP: CCM Report Of the 12th meeting(2010)to the CIPM Recommendation 2010. G1, 1–12 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tommasini, D., H.B., Eichenberger, A., Vorotszhov, A.: The ultra-stable magnet of the Mark II experiment. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26(4), 0602405 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sanchez, C.A., et al.: A determination of Planck’s constant using the NRC watt balance. Metrologia 51(2), S5–S14 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wood, B.M., et al.: A summary of the Planck constant determinations using the NRC Kibble balance. Metrologia 54(3), 399–409 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiang, Z., et al.: On the gravimetric contribution to watt balance experiments. Metrologia 50(5), 452–471 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robinson, I.A.: Watt and joule balances. Metrologia 51(2), S1–S3 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Consultative Committee for Mass and Related Quantities(CCM). p. 1–39 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robinson, I.A.: Alignment of the NPL Mark II watt balance. Meas. Sci. Technol. 23(12), 124012 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seifert, F., A.P., Li, S., Han, B., Chao, L, Cao, A.: Construction, measurement, shimming, and performance of the NIST-4 magnet system. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 63(12), 3027–3038 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical Engineering and AutomationHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.The Key Laboratory for the Electrical Quantum Standard of AQSIQBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations