International Journal of Theoretical Physics

, Volume 49, Issue 10, pp 2523–2527 | Cite as

Quantum Darwinism Requires an Extra-Theoretical Assumption of Encoding Redundancy

Article

Abstract

Observers restricted to the observation of pointer states of apparatus cannot conclusively demonstrate that the pointer of an apparatus \(\mathcal{A}\) registers the state of a system of interest S without perturbing S. Observers cannot, therefore, conclusively demonstrate that the states of a system S are redundantly encoded by pointer states of multiple independent apparatus without destroying the redundancy of encoding. The redundancy of encoding required by quantum Darwinism must, therefore, be assumed from outside the quantum-mechanical formalism and without the possibility of experimental demonstration.

Keywords

Quantum Darwinism Environment as witness Redundant encoding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zurek, W.H.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003). arXiv:quant-ph/0105127v3 CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zurek, W.H.: Nat. Phys. 5, 181 (2009). arXiv:0903.5082v1 [quant-ph] CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zwolak, M., Quan, H.T., Zurek, W.H.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 110402 (2009). arXiv:0904.0418v2 [quant-ph] CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zwolak, M., Quan, H.T., Zurek, W.H.: (2009). arXiv:0911.4307v1 [quant-ph]
  5. 5.
    Forrest, P.: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2006). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/identity-indiscernible/
  6. 6.
    Tegmark, M.: Phys. Rev. E 61, 4194 (2000). arXiv:quant-ph/9907009v2 ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hicks, K.: Proc. IX Int. Conf. Hypernuclear Strange Part Phys. Springer, Berlin (2006), p. 365. arXiv:hep-ph/0703004v3 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Caunes MinervoisFrance

Personalised recommendations