Relational Interpretation of the Wave Function and a Possible Way Around Bell’s Theorem
The famous “spooky action at a distance” in the EPR-scenario is shown to be a local interaction, once entanglement is interpreted as a kind of “nearest neighbor” relation among quantum systems. Furthermore, the wave function itself is interpreted as encoding the “nearest neighbor” relations between a quantum system and spatial points. This interpretation becomes natural, if we view space and distance in terms of relations among spatial points. Therefore, “position” becomes a purely relational concept. This relational picture leads to a new perspective onto the quantum mechanical formalism, where many of the “weird” aspects, like the particle-wave duality, the non-locality of entanglement, or the “mystery” of the double-slit experiment, disappear. Furthermore, this picture circumvents the restrictions set by Bell’s inequalities, i.e., a possible (realistic) hidden variable theory based on these concepts can be local and at the same time reproduce the results of quantum mechanics.
Key Wordsrelational space relational interpretation of the wave function locality Bell’s theorem
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Born, M. (ed.) (1971). The Born-Einstein Letters Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
- Bruβ, D. (2001). Proceedings of the ICQI Rochester Conference, lanl e-print quant-ph/0110078.Google Scholar
- Clarke, S. (1716). A collection of papers which passed between the late learned Mr. Leibniz and Dr. Clarke in the years 1715–1716 relating to the principles of natural philosophy and religion.Google Scholar
- Coecke, B. (2000). The Logic of Entanglement. An Invitation. Research Report PRG-RR-01-12 Oxford University Computing Laboratory (available at web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/publications/tr/rr-03-12.html
- Descartes, R. (1644). Principia Philosophiae, Apud Ludovicum Elzevirium, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- deWitt, B. S. (1970). Quantum Mechanics and Reality Physics Today; Sept., 30–35.Google Scholar
- Haag, R. (2004). Mind and Matter 2/2, 53.Google Scholar
- Leibniz, G. W. (1954). Principes de la Philosophie ou Monadologie Presse Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar
- Mach, E. (1883). Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung historisch-kritisch dargestellt (English The Science of Mechanics), F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig.Google Scholar
- Penrose, R. (1972). In Magig without Magic, J. R. Klauder, ed. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
- Rovelli, C. (2004). Quantum Gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.Google Scholar
- Weinberg, S. (2000). The Quantum Theory of Fields Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar