Advertisement

International Journal of Speech Technology

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 1057–1070 | Cite as

Effective use of combined excitation source and vocal-tract information for speaker recognition tasks

  • Krishna Dutta
  • Jagabandhu Mishra
  • Debadatta Pati
Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

In automatic speaker recognition (SR) tasks the widely used score level combination scheme derives a general consensus from the independent opinions of individual evidences. Instead, we conjecture that collectively contributed decisions may be more effective. Based on this idea this work proposes an effective combination scheme, where the vocal-tract and excitation source information take decisions collectively, resulting higher improvements in SR accuracy. In the proposed scheme, independently made feature-specific models are padded for building resultant models. While testing, feature-specific test features are padded in similar fashion, and then used for comparison with resultant models. The main advantage of this proposed scheme is that it does not require any ground truth information for combined use of multiple evidences like in score level combination scheme. The potential of the proposed scheme is experimentally demonstrated by conducting different speaker recognition experiments in clean and noisy conditions, and also comparative studies with score level fusion scheme as reference. The TIMIT database is used for studies with clean case, and Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati Multi-Variability (IITG-MV) databases for noisy case. In clean case the proposed scheme provides relatively 1% of higher improvements in performance for GMM based speaker identification system and 8.5% for GMM–UBM based speaker verification system. In noisy case the corresponding parameters are 1% and 3%, respectively. The final evaluations on NIST-2003 database with GMM–UBM and i-vector based systems show relatively higher improvements in performance by 5.17% and 4.73%, respectively. The proposed scheme is observed to be statistically more significant than the commonly used score level fusion of multiple evidences.

Keywords

Vocal-tract and excitation source information Score level fusion Gaussian mixtures model (GMM) Gaussian mixtures model–universal background model (GMM–UBM) I-vectors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research work is funded by Department of Electronics and Information Technology (DeitY), Govt. of India through the project “Development of Excitation Source Features Based Spoof Resistant and Robust Audio-Visual Person Identification System”. The research work is carried out in Speech Processing and Pattern Recognition (SPARC) laboratory at National Institute of Technology Nagaland, Dimapur, India.

References

  1. Altnccay, H., & Demirekler, M. (2000). An information theoretic framework for weight estimation in the combination of probabilistic classifiers for speaker identification. Speech Communication, 30(4), 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altnccay, H., & Demirekler, M. (2003). Speaker identification by combining multiple classifiers using dempster-shafer theory of evidence. Speech Communication, 41(4), 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atal, B. S. (1976). Automatic recognition of speakers from their voices. Proceedings of the IEEE, 64(4), 460–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beigi, H. (2011). Fundamentals of speaker recognition. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, J. P. (1997). Speaker recognition: A tutorial. Proceedings of IEEE, 85(9), 1437–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, W. M., Sturim, D. E., & Reynolds, D. A. (2006). Support vector machines using GMM supervectors for speaker verification. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 13(5), 308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Das, R. K., & Prasanna, S. R. M. (2016). Exploring different attributes of source information for speaker verification with limited test data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(1), 184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dehak, N., Kenny, P. J., Dehak, R., Dumouchel, P., & Ouellet, P. (2011). Front-end factor analysis for speaker verification. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 19(4), 788–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Djemili, R., Bedda, M., & Bourouba, H. (2007). A hybrid gmm/svm system for text independent speaker identification. International Journal of Computer and Information Science & Engineering, 1(1).Google Scholar
  10. Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. (1973). Pattern classification and scene analysis. New York: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Farrell, K., Kosonocky, S., & Mammone, R. (1994). Neural tree network/vector quantization probability estimators for speaker recognition. In Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE workshop on neural networks for signal processing, pp. 279–288.Google Scholar
  12. Feustel, T. C., Logan, R. J., & Velius, G. A. (1988). Human and machine performance on speaker identity verification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(S1), S55–S55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Furui, S. (1981). Cepstral analysis technique for automatic speaker verification. IEEE Transactions on Acoustic, Speech, and Signal Processing, 29, 254–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garofolo, J. S., Lamel, L. F., Fisher, W. M., Fiscus, J. G., Pallett, D. S., Dahlgren, N. L., et al. (1993). Timit acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus. Philadelphia: Linguistic data consortium.Google Scholar
  15. Haris, B. C., Pradhan, G., Misra, A., Prasanna, S. R. M., Das, R. K., & Sinha, R. (2012). Multi-variability speaker recognition database in Indian scenario. International Journal of Speech Technology, 15(4), 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hermansky, H., & Morgan, N. (1994). Rasta processing of speech. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 2(4), 578–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hosseinzadeh, D., & Krishnan, S. (2007). Combining vocal source and mfcc features for enhanced speaker recognition performance using gmms. In IEEE 9th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, pp. 365–368.Google Scholar
  18. Kenny, P., Boulianne, G., Ouellet, P., & Dumouchel, P. (2007). Speaker and session variability in gmm-based speaker verification. IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing, 15(4), 1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenny, P., Boulianne, G., Ouellet, P., & Dumouchel, P. (2007). Joint factor analysis versus eigenchannels in speaker recognition. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 15(4), 1435–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Linguistic data consortium, switchboard cellular part 2 audio. (2004). Retrieved from, http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/Catalog/CatalogEntry.jspcatalogId=LDC2004S07.
  21. Martin, A., Doddington, G., Kamm, T., Ordowski, M., & Przybocki, M. (1997). The det curve in assessment of detection task performance. In Technical Report, National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg MD.Google Scholar
  22. Mashao, D. J., & Skosan, M. (2006). Combining classifier decisions for robust speaker identification. Pattern Recognition, 39(1), 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murty, K. S. R., & Yegnanarayana, B. (2006). Combining evidence from residual phase and mfcc features for speaker recognition. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 13(1), 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakagawa, S., Wang, L., & Ohtsuka, S. (2012). Speaker identification and verification by combining mfcc and phase information. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20(4), 1085–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neyman, J. (1937). Outline of a theory of statistical estimation based on the classical theory of probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 236(767), 333–380.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Pati, D., & Prasanna, S. R. M. (2010). Speaker recognition from excitation source perspective. IETE Technical Review, 27(2), 138–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pati, D., & Prasanna, S. R. M. (2011). Subsegmental, segmental and suprasegmental processing of linear prediction residual for speaker information. International Journal of Speech Technology, 14(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pati, D., & Prasanna, S. R. M. (2013). A comparative study of explicit and implicit modelling of subsegmental speaker-specific excitation source information. Sadhana, 38(4), 591–620.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Poh, N., & Kittler, J. (2008). Incorporating model-specific score distribution in speaker verification systems. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 16(3), 594–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prasanna, S. R. M., Gupta, C. S., & Yegnanarayana, B. (2006). Extraction of speaker-specific excitation information from linear prediction residual of speech. Speech Communication, 48(10), 1243–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramachandran, R. P., Farrell, K. R., Ramachandran, R., & Mammone, R. J. (2002). Speaker recognition-general classifier approaches and data fusion methods. Pattern Recognition, 35(12), 2801–2821.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramakrishnan, A., Abhiram, B., & Prasanna, S. R. M. (2015). Voice source characterization using pitch synchronous discrete cosine transform for speaker identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(6), EL469–EL475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reynolds, D. (1995). Speaker identification and verification using Gaussian mixture speaker models. Speech Communication, 17, 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reynolds, D. A. (1995). Large population speaker identification using clean and telephone speech. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2(3), 46–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reynolds, D. A., Quatieri, T. F., & Dunn, R. B. (2000). Speaker verification using adapted Gaussian mixture models. Digital Signal Processing, 10(1–3), 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. The 2003 Nist speaker recognition evaluation plan (2003). In Proceedings of NIST Speaker Recognition Workshop, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  37. Venturini, A., Zao, L., & Coelho, R. (2014). On speech features fusion, α-integration Gaussian modeling and multi-style training for noise robust speaker classification. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 22(12), 1951–1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wong, L. P., & Russell, M. (2001). Text-dependent speaker verification under noisy conditions using parallel model combination. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing(ICASSP01), 1, 457-460.Google Scholar
  39. Yegnanarayana, B., Prasanna, S. R. M., Zachariah, J. M., & Gupta, C. S. (2005). Combining evidence from source, suprasegmental and spectral features for a fixed-text speaker verification system. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 13(4), 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yegnanarayana, B., Reddy, K. S., & Kishore, S. P. (2001). Source and system features for speaker recognition using ANNN models. In Proceedings of Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP-01) (Vol. 1, pp. 409–412).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringNational Institute of Technology NagalandDimapurIndia

Personalised recommendations