Advertisement

International Journal of Speech Technology

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 385–392 | Cite as

Production of referring expressions in Arabic

  • Imtiaz Hussain KhanEmail author
Special Issue Article
First Online:
  • 185 Downloads

Abstract

Most existing studies on evaluation of the generation of referring expressions (GRE) algorithms intend to find how close GRE output is to human output, when they generate expressions in a similar situation. This article explores how native Arabic speakers produce referring expressions. Participants were presented with objects in visual domains and they were asked to describe the (marked) target object by typing a description (Arabic expressions) which can uniquely identify the target to their addressee. The data revealed that a large proportion (above 35 %) of overspecifying descriptions were produced by participants, and that this overspecification is not only because of certain preference for some attributes over the other attributes, the overspecification (and also sometime underspecification) may be because of the complexity (in terms of length) of the description itself. These data were also compared against the TUNA corpus data, which were elicited by native English speakers in identical conditions as ours. A comparative analysis of Arabic and English descriptions reveals that overall both Arabic and English speakers produce similar linguistic descriptions under the identical conditions, implying that reference generation phenomena are not language specific.

Keywords

Generation of referring expressions Underspecifying descriptions Overspecifying descriptions Minimal descriptions Arabic referring expressions 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abdullah, A., & Khan, I. H. (2015). A novel study of concept-color association of association among multi-channel NIRS (Near-infra red spectroscopy) channels using data mining. Cognitive Computation.Google Scholar
  2. Dale, R. (1992). Generating referring expressions: Building descriptions in a domain of objects and processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dale, R., & Reiter, E. (1995). Computational interpretations of the Gricean Maxims in the generation of referring expressions. Cognitive Science, 18, 233–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fang, R., Doering, M., & Chai, J. (2015). Embodied collaborative referring expression generation in situated human–robot interaction. In Proceedings of 10th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (pp. 271–278). Portland, Oregon: ACM.Google Scholar
  5. Farghaly, A., & Shaalan, K. (2009). Arabic natural language processing: Challenges and solutions. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, 8(4), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gardent, C. (2002). Generating minimal distinguishing descriptions. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 96–103). Philadelphia: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  7. Garoufi, K., & Koller, A. (2014). Generation of effective referring expressions in situated context. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(8), 986–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gatt, A., & Paggio, P. (2013). What and where: An empirical investigation of pointing gestures and descriptions in multimodal referring actions. In Proceedings of 14th European workshop on natural language generation (pp. 82–91). Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  9. Gatt, A., Van der Sluis, I., & Van Deemter, K. (2007). Evaluating algorithms for the generation of referring expressions using a balanced corpus. In Proceedings of the 11th European workshop on natural language generation (pp. 49–56). Saarbruecken: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  10. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. (P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan, Eds.) Syntax and semantics, 3, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
  11. Gupta, S., & Stent, A. (2005). Automatic evaluation of referring expression generation using corpora. In Proceedings of the workshop on using corpora for natural language generation, (pp. 1–6). Brighton: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  12. Habash, N. (2010). Introduction to Arabic Natural Language Processing. In G. Hirst (Ed.), Synthesis lectures on human language technologies. California: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Khan, I. H., Deemter, K. V., & Ritchie, G. (2012). Managing ambiguity in reference generation: The role of surface structure. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(2), 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koolen, R., Gatt, A., Goudbeek, M., & Krahmer, E. (2011). Factors causing overspecification in definite descriptions. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3231–3250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krahmer, E., & Van Deemter, K. (2012). Computational generation of referring expressions: A survey. Computational Linguistics, 38(1), 173–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mellish, C., & Dale, R. (1998). Evaluation in the generation of referring expressions. Computer Speech & Language, 12(4), 349–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell, M., Van Deemter, K., & Reiter, E. (2013). Generating expressions that refer to visible objects. In Proceedings of North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics—Human language technology. (pp. 1174–1184). Atlanta.Google Scholar
  18. Nwesri, A. A., Tahaghoghi, S. M., & Scholer, F. (2005). Stemming Arabic conjunctions and prepositions. In 12th international conference on string processing and information retireval. (pp. 206–217). Buenos Aires: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Paris, C., Colineau, N., & Wilkinson, R. (2006). Evaluations of NLG systems: Common corpus and tasks or common dimensions and metrics? In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on natural language generation (pp. 127–129). Sydney: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  20. Pechmann, T. (1989). Incremental speech prooduction and referential overspecification. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 89–110.Google Scholar
  21. Reiter, E., & Dale, R. (2000). Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shaalan, K., Monem, A. A., Rafea, A., & Baraka, H. (2008). Generating Arabic text from interlingua. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on computational approaches to Arabic script-based languages, (pp. 137–144). Stanford.Google Scholar
  23. Van Deemter, K., Van der Sluis, I., & Gatt, A. (2006). Building a semanticallytransparent corpus for the generation of referring expressions. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on natural language generation (pp. 130–132). Sydney: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  24. Viethen, J., & Dale, R. (2006). Towards the evaluation of referring expression generation. In Proceedings of the 4th Australasian language technology workshop (pp. 115–122). Sydney: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  25. Villringer, A., & Chance, B. (1997). Non-invasive optical spectroscopy and imaging of human brain function. Trends in Neurosciences, 20(10), 435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options