Advertisement

Challenges in natural language processing: the case of metaphor (commentary)

  • John A. Barnden
Article
  • 141 Downloads

Abstract

This article comments on some ways in which metaphor is relevant to practical language technology, for either text or speech. While the article mentions some deep problems, it nevertheless points out that certain issues are less troublesome than they might appear to be, and that metaphor in real discourse has some characteristics that could help, rather than hinder, practical discourse-processing. The article also mentions the author’s ongoing work on developing a new view of how metaphor and metonymy relate to each other. This view is based on a deconstruction into underlying dimensions.

Metaphor Metonymy Figurative language Natural language understanding Natural language technology Natural language pragmatics Discourse processing Lexical resources Language resources Ontologies 

References

  1. Barnden, J. A. (2007). Metaphor, semantic preferences and context-sensitivity. In K. Ahmad, C. Brewster, & M. Stevenson (Eds.), Words and intelligence II: Essays in honor of Yorick Wilks (pp. 39–62). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  2. Barnden, J. A. (2008). Metaphor and artificial intelligence: Why they matter to each other. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 311–338). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  3. Barnden, J. A. (in press). Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics. Google Scholar
  4. Barnden, J. A. (n.d.). Possible signals of metaphoricity not linked to any particular conceptual metaphor. http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~jab/ATT-Meta/metaphoricity-signals.html.
  5. Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum. Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2003). Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 161–173. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dirven, R., & Pörings, R. (Eds.) (2002). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
  8. Drew, P., & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language and Society, 27, 495–522. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (Ed.) (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  10. Goatly, A. (1997). The language of metaphors. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  11. Langlotz, A. (2006). Idiom creativity: A cognitive-linguistic model of idiom-representation and idiom-variation in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar
  12. Low, G., Littlemore, J., & Koester, A. (2008). The use of metaphor in three university academic lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 428–455. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moon, R. (1998). Fixed idioms and expressions in English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations