Advertisement

Thinking and Writing Visual Global Politics – a Review of R. Bleiker’s Visual Global Politics (2018, Abingdon and New York: Routledge)

  • Gabi SchlagEmail author
Article

Abstract

Any reader who is interested in the rich and diverse relations between the visual, the political, and the global should look out for Roland Bleiker’s edited volume with the simple, yet programmatic title Visual Global Politics (VGP). In my review, I critically reflect the many virtues but also missed opportunities and suggest ways how this excellent edition could further develop as a living and creative project.

Keywords

Visual turn Global politics Image politics 

References

  1. Andersen, R. S., Vuori, J. A., & Mutlu, C. E. (2015). Visuality. In C. Aradau, J. Huysmans, A. Neal, & N. Voelkner (Eds.), Critical security methods: New frameworks for analysis. Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Aradau, C., & Huysmans, J. (2014). Critical methods in international relations: the politics of techniques, devices and acts. European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), 596–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aradau, C., Huysmans, J., Neal, A., & Voelkner, N. (Eds.). (2015). Critical security methods: new frameworks for analysis. Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Belting, H. (2005). Image, medium, body: a new approach to iconology. Critical Inquiry, 31(2), 302–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhabha, H. K. (2004/2012). The location of culture. Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bleiker, R. (2001). The aesthetic turn in international political theory. Millennium, 30(3), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bleiker, R. (2014). Visual assemblages: from causality to conditions of possibility. In M. Acuto & S. Curtis (Eds.), Reassembling international theory. Palgrave.Google Scholar
  8. Bleiker, R. (2015). Pluralist methods for visual global politics. Millennium, 43(3), 872–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bleiker, R. (2017). In search of thinking space: reflections on the aesthetic turn in international political theory. Millennium, 45(2), 258–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boehm, G., & Mitchell, W. J. (2009). Pictorial versus iconic turn: two letters. Culture, Theory and Critique, 50(2–3), 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boulton, A. (2009). Three images by Angus Boulton. Review of International Studies, 35(4), 859–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bredekamp, H., Dünkel, V., & Schneider, B. (Eds.). (2015). The technical image. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Callahan, W. A. (2015). The visual turn in IR: documentary filmmaking as a critical method. Millennium, 43(3), 891–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danchev, A. (2010). The artist and the terrorist, or the paintable and the unpaintable: Gerhard Richter and the Baader-Meinhof group. Alternatives, 35(2), 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixit, P., & Stump, J. L. (2013). Critical terrorism studies: an introduction to research methods. Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Eder, J., & Klonk, C. (Eds.). (2017). Image operations: visual media and political conflict. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Elkins, J. (2013a). An introduction to the visual studies that is not in this book. In J. Elkins et al. (Eds.), Theorizing visual studies: writing through the discipline. Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Elkins, J. (2013b). An introduction to the visual as argument. In J. Elkins et al. (Eds.), Theorizing visual studies: writing through the discipline. Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Elkins, J. (Eds.). (2007). Is art history global? Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Evans, J., & Hall, S. (Eds.). (1999). Visual culture: a reader. SAGE.Google Scholar
  21. Geis, A., & Schlag, G. (2017). ‘The facts cannot be denied’: legitimacy, war and the use of chemical weapons in Syria. Global Discourse, 7(2–3), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibbon, J., & Sylvester, C. (2017). Thinking like an artist-researcher about war. Millennium, 45(2), 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen, L. (2015). How images make world politics: international icons and the case of Abu Ghraib. Review of International Studies, 41(2), 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hutchison, E. (2014). A global politics of pity? Disaster imagery and the emotional construction of solidarity after the 2004 Asian tsunami. International Political Sociology, 8(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson, P. T. (2010/2016). The conduct of inquiry in international relations: philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Juneja, M. & Schenk, G. J. (Eds.). (2014). Disaster as image. Iconographies and Media Strategies across Europe and Asia. Schnell + Steiner.Google Scholar
  27. Klotz, A., & Prakash, D. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative methods in international relations. A Pluralist Guide: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Koddenbrock, K. J. (2015). Strategies of critique in international relations: from Foucault and Latour towards Marx. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Leander, A. (2008). Thinking tools. In A. Klotz & D. Prakash (Eds.), Qualitative methods in international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Mitchell, W. J. T. (1984). What is an image? New Literary History, 15(3), 503–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mitchell, W. J.T. (2004). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Moxey, K. (2008). Visual studies and the iconic turn. Journal of Visual Culture, 7(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rancière, J. (2011). The emancipated spectator. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  35. Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual material. SAGE.Google Scholar
  36. Salter, M. B., & Mutlu, C. E. (Eds.). (2013). Research methods in critical security studies: an introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Schlag, G. (2018a). Moving images and the politics of pity. In M. Clément & E. Sangar (Eds.), Researching emotions in international relations: methodological perspectives on the emotional turn. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Schlag, G. (2018b). The afterlife of Osama bin Laden: performative pictures in the “war on terror”. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 1–18.Google Scholar
  39. Sturken, M., & Cartwright, L. (2009/2017). Practices of looking: an introduction to visual culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Vuori, J. A., & Andersen, R. S. (Eds.). (2018). Visual security studies: sights and spectacles of insecurity and war. Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Helmut Schmidt UniversityHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations