Museum Politics in Turkey Under the Islamic Justice and Development Party (AKP): the Case of the Istanbul Museum of the History of Science and Technology in Islam

  • Lorenzo PosoccoEmail author


Under the Justice and Development Party (AKP) led by its leader Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the Turkish State and society at large have been subject to significant changes. Besides the recent increasing authoritarianism of the government, Islam made its way through politics like never before, and a new national ideology promoted by the AKP, Turkish Muslim Nationalism, laid the cultural foundations for a new Turkey and new Turks. In this paper, I put forward the claim that new national museums play a relevant role in shaping this new Turkey. In particular, they function as performative cabinets exhibiting the national ideology of the ruling party. I have looked into one of these museums, the Istanbul Museum of the Science and Technology in Islam, researching the links between the AKP, which promotes Turkish Muslim nationalism, and new museums, which exhibit it. The outcome of this study suggests that the IMSTI functioned as the resource and the host of national symbols manufactured by and within the ruling class to be supplied to the masses. The political class, represented here by the AKP, commissioned the museum, whereas cultural agents that shared the party’s political ideology were appointed to make it. This collaboration benefited both parts, so much so that profit seems to have been a crucial ingredient in the making of this museum.


Turkey Museums National identity Islam 


  1. Akyol M. (2014). Turkey’s rapid museum expansion. Al-monitor. Accessed 04 Jul 2018.
  2. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Revised edition. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, T. (1995). The birth of the museum, history, theory, politics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bonini-Baraldi, S., Shoup, D., Zan, L. (2014). A centralized decentralization: outsourcing in the Turkish cultural heritage sector. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 20(1), 54–77.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (2014). Sur l’état. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P., & Chartier, R. (2015). The sociologist and the historian. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bozkuş, B. (2014) Rethinking nationalism in the case of 1453 conquest museum in Istanbul. In Global Media Journal: TR Edition 4 (8), Spring.Google Scholar
  9. Breuilly, J. (1982). Nationalism and the State. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brubaker, R. (1992) Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cagaptay, S. (2017). The New Sultan: Erdoğan and the crisis of modern. Turkey: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd..Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent. The political economy of the mass media. New York City: Pantheon books.Google Scholar
  14. Crooke, E. (2016). Artefacts as agents for change: commemoration and exchange via material culture. Irish Political Studies, 31(1), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. and Deleuze, J. (1977). Intellectuals and power: a conversation between Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze. In D. Bourchard (Ed.), Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: selected essays and interviews by Michel Foucault. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fyfe, G. (2011). Sociology and the Social Aspects of Museums, pp. 33-49, in Macdonald S. (Ed.) (2011) A Companion to Museum Studies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Giesen, B. (2011). Intellectuals and politics. Nations and Nationalism, 17(2), 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gellner E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Halbwachs, M. (1950). On collective memory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hobsbawm, E., Ranger, T. (eds.) (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hürriyet Daily News (2014). Erdoğan vows to teach Turkish children Muslim discovery of Americas. Available at:ğan-vows-to-teach-turkish-children-muslim-discovery-of-americas.aspx?pageID=238&nID=74485&NewsCatID=338.
  22. Jennings, & Kemp-Welch (Ed.) (1997). Intellectuals in politics: from the Dreyfus affair to Salman Rushdie. 1st edition. Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Keyman, E. F. (2014). The AK Party: Dominant Party, New Turkey and Polarization. Insight Turkey, 16(2), 19–31.Google Scholar
  24. Macdonald, S.J. (2003). Museums, national, postnational and transcultural identities. In Museum and Society. 1(1), 1–16Google Scholar
  25. Mann M. (1995). A political theory of nationalism and its excesses. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lynch, J. (2013). Prepare to Believe: The Creation Museum as Embodied Conversion Narrative. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 16(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Muslim Village (2010). Exhibition on Islam’s golden age to tour the globe. Available at:
  28. Mclean, F. (2006). Introduction: Heritage and Identity. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(1), 3–7.Google Scholar
  29. Newman, A., McLean, F. (2006). The impact of museums upon identity. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(1), 49–68.Google Scholar
  30. Öncü, A. (1999). Istanbulites and others: the cultural cosmology of being middle class in the era of globalization. In Ç. Keyder (Ed.), Istanbul: between the global and the local (pp. 95–119). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  31. Pérouse, J.F., Cheviron, N. (2016). Erdoğan: Nouveau père de la Turquie? Editions François Bourin.Google Scholar
  32. Saatçioğlu, B. (2010). Unpacking the compliance puzzle: the case of Turkey‘s AKP under EU conditionality. KFG working paper series, no. 14, June 2010, Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) The Transformative Power of Europe. Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  33. Shaw, W. (2007). Museums and narratives of display from the late Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic. Muqarnas Online, 24(1), 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shaw, W. M. K. (2011). National Museums in the Republic of Turkey: Palimpsests within a Centralized State. In Building National Museums in Europe 1750–2010. Conference proceedings from EuNaMus, European National Museums: Identity Politics, the Uses of the Past and the European Citizen, Bologna 28–30 April 2011. In P. Aronsson & G. Elgenius (Eds.), EuNaMus report no 1. Published by Linköping University Electronic Press: Accessed 04 Jul 2018.
  35. Skylife (2013). The Istanbul Museum of the history of science and technology in Islam. Available at:
  36. Steinvorth D. (2009). Nostalgia for the Ottomans. Disillusioned with Europe, Turkey Looks East. Accessed 04 Jul 2018.
  37. Stewart K. (2018). The Museum of the Bible is a safe space for Christian nationalists. The New York Times. January, 2018. Accessed 04 Jul 2018.
  38. Şafak, Y. (2014). Muslims discovered America! Available at:
  39. Telegraph (29 January 2008). The untold story of Arabic brilliance should be a timely reminder of a proud heritage, says Jim Al-Khalili. Available at Accessed 04 Jul 2018.
  40. The Economist (2016). A war to remember. Turkey’s shallow Ottomania.
  41. The Guardian (16 November, 2014). Muslims discovered America, says Turkish president. Available at:ğan-christopher-columbus. Accessed 04 Jul 2018.
  42. The Turkey Analyst (2015). The Islamization of Turkey: Erdoğan’s Education Reforms. Available at:
  43. Türeli, I. (2006). Modelling citizenship in Turkey’s miniature park. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 17(2), 55–69.Google Scholar
  44. Wacquant, L. (2013). Symbolic power and group-making: On Pierre Bourdieu’s reframing of class. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(2), 274–291.Google Scholar
  45. White, J. (2009). Muslim nationalism and the new Turks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of SociologyUniversity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceÉcole des Hautes Études en Sciences SocialesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations