Advertisement

Challenging the Israeli Occupation Through Testimony and Confession: the Case of Anti-Denial SMOs Machsom Watch and Breaking the Silence

  • Sara HelmanEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article analyzes the repertoires of contention and discourse of two Israeli anti-denial movements, Breaking the Silence and Machsom Watch. Through confession and testimony, both social movement organizations (SMOs) demand that Israeli society acknowledge its “problematic present,” which includes human rights violations in the Palestinian Occupied Territories in a situation of ongoing ethno-national conflict, and insist that it take responsibility for this reality and act against it. It is based on the interpretative analyses of both SMOs’ reports. Reports are analyzed as narratives in the context of Israel’s national identity and its main motives which are also constitutive of a culture of collective denial. The article compares the testimonial practices of Machsom Watch to testimonies of women in Truth and Reconciliation Commissions and the confessions of Breaking the Silence veterans to those displayed in Truth and Reconciliation Commissions as well as confessions of veterans during the war in Iraq and Afghanistan. Confession and testimony are usually analyzed as blazing the path to a new and inclusive national identity (as was the case in South Africa). In the case of Israel, however, their adoption and mobilization destabilize national identity and turn it into a field of contention.

Keywords

Israel/Palestine Confession and testimony Repertoires of contention Social movements in Israel 

Notes

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank Niza Yanai and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughful comments.

References

  1. Alexander, J. (2004). Toward a theory of cultural trauma. In J. Alexander, R. Eyerman, B. Giesen, N. J. Smelser, & P. Sztompka (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. C. (2012). Holocaust and social trauma: moral restrictions in Israel. In J. C. Alexander (Ed.), Trauma: a social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ancelovici, M., & Jenson, J. (2013). Standardization of transnational diffusion: the case of truth commissions and conditional cash tranfers. International Political Sociology, 7, 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atali, A. (2011). Terrorists are financing left organizations. In: NRG. http://www.nrg.co.il/online/1/ART2199/138.html2.4.
  5. Avruch, K., & Vejarano, B. (2002). Truth and reconciliation commissions: a review essay and annotated bibliography. Online Journal of Peace and Conflict Resolution, 4(2), 37–76.Google Scholar
  6. Bander, A. (2011). The new NGOs legislative act. NRG.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Ari, E. (1998). Mastering soldiers: conflict, emotions, and the enemy in an Israeli army unit. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  8. Ben-Eliezer, U. (2012). Old conflict, new war—Israel’s politics towards the Palestinians. New York: Palgrave-Mac-Millan.Google Scholar
  9. Breaking the Silence (2005). Rules of engagement in Judea and Samaria. http://www.shovrimshtika.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Rules_of_Engagement_Testimonies_2005.pdf
  10. Breaking the Silence (2010). Occupation of the territories. Ed. Jerusalem: Breaking the Silence.Google Scholar
  11. Breaking the Silence (2011). http://www.shovrimshtika.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Occupation_of_the_Territories_Heb.pdf. Jerusalem: Breaking the Silence.
  12. Breaking the Silence. (2012). Our harsh logic: Israeli soldiers’ testimonies of the occupied territories 2000–2010. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  13. Chabot, S., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2002). Globalization and transnational diffusion between social movements: reconceptualizing the dissemination of the Gandhian repertoire and the “coming out” routine. Theory and Society, 31(6), 697–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Crosby, A., & Brinton Lykes, M. (2011). Mayan women survivors speak: the gendered relations of truth telling in postwar Guatemala. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5(3), 456–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Della Porta, D., & Kriesi, H. (1999). Social movements in a globalizing world: an introduction. In D. Porta, K. Hanspeter, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Social movements in a globalizing world. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Fassin, D. (2008). The humanitarian politics of testimony: subjectification through trauma in the Israeli Palestinian-conflict.Google Scholar
  18. Feldman, J. (2012). Nationalizing personal trauma, personalizing national redemption: performing testimony in Auschwitz-Birkenau. In N. Argenti & K. Schramm (Eds.), Remembering violence: anthropological perspectives on intergeneration transmission. Brooklyn, New York: Bergham Books.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume I: an introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  20. Fridman, O. (2008). Breaking states of denial: anti-occupation activism in Israel after 2000. Belgrad: SIT- Study Abroad.Google Scholar
  21. Fridman, O. (2011). ‘It was like fighting a war with our own people’: anti-war activism in Serbia during the 1990s. Nationalities Papers, 39(4), 507–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedman-Peleg, K., & Bilu, Y. (2011). From PTSD to “national trauma”: the case of the Israel trauma center for victims of terror and war. Transcultural Psychiatry, 48(4), 416–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gan, A. (2009). The tanks of tammuz and the seventh day: the emergence of opposite poles of Israeli identity after the six day war. Journal of Israeli History, 28(2), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giesen, B. (2004). The trauma of perpetrators: the holocaust as a traumatic reference of German national identity. In J. C. Alexander, R. Eyerman, B. Giesen, & P. Sztompa (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Givan, R. K., Roberts, K. M., & Soule, S. A. (Eds.). (2010). The diffusion of social movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2008). Empathetic repair after mass trauma: when vengeance is arrested. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(3), 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldenberg, T. (2004). Systematic abuse of administrative means. Jerusalem: Machsom Watch.Google Scholar
  28. Guzman-Bouvard, M. (1994). Revolutionizing motherhood: the mothers of the plaza de mayo. Wilmington, Delaware: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
  29. Helman, S. (1997). Militarism and the construction of community. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 25, 305–332.Google Scholar
  30. Helman, S. (1999a). From soldiering and motherhood to citizenship: a study of four Israeli peace protest movements. Social Politics, 6(3), 292–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Helman, S. (1999b). Redefining obligations, creating rights: conscientious objection and the redefinition of citizenship in Israel. Citizenship Studies, 3(1), 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Helman, S., & Rapoport, T. (1997). Women in black: challenging Israel’s gender and socio-political order. British Journal of Sociology, 48(4), 681–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Henderson, V. L. (2009). Citizenship in the line of fire: protective accompaniment, proxy citizenship, and pathways for transnational solidarity in Guatemala. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(5), 969–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herzog, H., & Lahad, K. (2005). The relationships between knowing, silence and action. In H. Herzog & K. Lahad (Eds.), Knowing and denying: mechanisms of denial and silencing in Israeli society. Jerusalem: Van Leer Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Humphrey, M. (2000). From terror to trauma: commissioning truth for national reconciliation. Social Identities, 6(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Iraq Veterans Against the War and Aaron Glantz. (2008). Winter soldiers in Iran and Afganistan—eyewitness accounts of the occupation. Chicago, Il: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  37. Izraeli, D. N. (1997). Gendering military service in the Israeli defense forces. Israel Social Science Research, 12(1), 129–166.Google Scholar
  38. Kane, A. (2000). Reconstructing culture in historic explanation: narratives as cultural structure and practice. History and Memory, 39(October), 311–330.Google Scholar
  39. Katriel, T., & Shavit, N. (2013). Speaking out—testimonial rhetoric in Soldiers’ dissent. Versus: Quaderni di Studi Semiotici, 116, 79–103.Google Scholar
  40. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(1), 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keshet, Y. (nd). Machsom Watch—a brief history. http://www.machsomwatch.org/en/history.
  42. Kimmerling, B. (1993). Militarism in Israeli society. Theory and criticism: an Israeli forum, 4, 123–140. Hebrew.Google Scholar
  43. Kotef, H., & Amir, M. (2007). (En) Gendering checkpoints: checkpoint watch and the repercussions of intervention. Signs, 32(4), 973–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kurasawa, F. (2009). A message in a bottle. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(1), 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kutz-Flamenbaum, R. V. (2012). Mobilizing gender to promote peace: the case of Machsom Watch. Qualitative Sociology, 35(3), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lomsky-Feder, E. (2011). Competing models of nationalism: an analysis of memorial ceremonies in schools. Nations and Nationalism, 17(3), 581–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Machsom Watch. (2004). A counterview—checkpoints 2004. Jerusalem: Machsom Watch.Google Scholar
  48. Machsom Watch (2008a). In the dimmed light of street lamps the IDF maintains a moral black out. Machsom Watch.Google Scholar
  49. Machsom Watch (2008b). A simple story becoming a nightmare: a via dolorosa of checkpoint and arbitrary road bloc: Machsom Watch.Google Scholar
  50. Machsom Watch (2009). Invisible prisoners—Palestinians blacklisted by the general security services. Second Printing Edition: Machsom Watch.Google Scholar
  51. Machsom Watch (2010). A child crosses a checkpoint. Machsom Watch.Google Scholar
  52. Machsom Watch (2011). Invisible prisoners—don’t know why and there’s nowhere to turn. Machsom Watch.Google Scholar
  53. Machsom Watch and Physicians for Human Rights (2004). The bureaucracy of the occupation. Physicians for Human Rights.Google Scholar
  54. Maeso, S. R. (2010). Politica de Testimonia y reconocimiento en las comisiones de verdad guatemalteca y peruana en torno a la figura del’indio subversivo. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 88, 23–55.Google Scholar
  55. Malkki, L. E. (1996). Speechless emissaries: refugees, humanitarianism and dehistorization. Cultural Anthropology, 11(3), 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mansbach, D. (2007). Crossing borders: the power of duality in the protests of Machsom Watch. Theory and Criticism, 31, 77–99. Hebrew.Google Scholar
  57. McAdam, D. (1995). “Initiator” and “spin-off” movements: diffusion processes in protest cycles. In M. Traugott (Ed.), Repertoires and cycles of collective action. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  58. McLagan, M. (2006). Introduction: making human rights claims public. American Anthropologist, 108(1), 191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moon, C. (2006). Narrating political reconciliation: truth and reconciliation in South Africa. Social & Legal Studies, 15(2), 257–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Motsemme, N. (2004). The mute always speak: on women’s silences at the truth and reconciliation commission. Current Sociology, 52(5), 909–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nepstadt, S. E., & Smith, C. (2001). The social structure of moral outrage: recruitment to the Central America peace movement. In J. Goodwin, J. E. Jasper, & F. Polletta (Eds.), Passionate politics—emotions and social movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Niezen, R. (2010). Public justice and the anthropology of law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Norval, A. J. (1998). Memory, identity and the (Im)possibility of reconciliation: the work of the truth and reconciliation commission in South Africa. Constellations, 5(2), 250–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Omer, A. (2009). ‘It’s nothing Personal’: the globalisation of justice, the transferability of protest, and the case of the Palestine solidarity Movement1. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 9(3), 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Payne, L. A. (2004). In search of remorse: confessions of perpetrators of past state violence. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(1), 115–125.Google Scholar
  66. Posel, D. (2008). History as confession. Public Culture, 20, 119–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Redfield, P. (2006). A less modest witness: collective advocacy and motivated truth in a medical humanitarian movement. American Ethnologist, 33(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Roggeband, C. (2010). Transnational networks and institutions: how diffusion shaped the politicization of sexual harassment in Europe. In R. K. Givan, K. M. Roberts, & S. A. Soule (Eds.), The diffusion of social movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Ross, F. C. (2003). On having a voice and being heard: some after effects of testifying before the South African truth and reconciliation commission. Anthropological Theory, 3(3), 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ross, F. (2006). Linguistic bearings and testimonial practices. Journal of Language and Politics, 5(1), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rusell, B. (2008). A self-defining universe? Case studies from the ‘special hearings: women’ of South Africa’s truth and reconciliation commission. African Studies, 67(1), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sasson-Levy, O., Levy, Y., & Lomsky-Feder, E. (2011). Women breaking the silence. Gender & Society, 25(6), 740–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Seidman, G. (2000). Adjusting the lens: what do globalizations, transnationalism and the anti-apartheid movement mean for social movement theory. In J. A. Guidry, M. D. Kennedy, & M. Zald (Eds.), Globalizations and social movements: culture, power and the transnational public sphere. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Soule, S. A. (1997). The student divestment movement in the United States and tactical diffusion: the shantytown protest. Social Forces, 75(3), 855–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stobaugh, J. E., & Snow, D. A. (2010). Temporality and frame diffusion: the case of creationist/intelligent design and evolutionist movements from 1925 to 2005. In R. K. Givan, K. M. Roberts, & S. A. Soule (Eds.), The diffusion of social movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Tarrow, S. (2005a). The dualities of transnational contention: “Two activist solitudes” or a new world altogether? Mobilization, 10(1), 53–72.Google Scholar
  77. Tarrow, S. (2005b). The new transnational activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Teeger, C., & Vinitzky-Seroussi, V. (2007). Controlling for consensus: commemorating apartheid in South Africa. Symbolic Interaction, 30(1), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tilly, C. (1995). Contentious repertoires in Great Britain, 1758–1834. In M. Traugott (Ed.), Repertoires and cycles of collective action. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Tsutsui, K. (2006). Redressing past human rights violations: global dimensions of contemporary social movements. Social Forces, 85(1), 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tsutsui, K. (2009). The trajectory of perpetrators’ trauma: mnemonic politics around the Asia-Pacific war in Japan. Social Forces, 87(3), 1389–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Weiner, N. (2002). Four mothers. In In department of behavioral sciences. Beersheva: Ben Gurion University.Google Scholar
  83. Wolfsfeld, G. (2003). The news media and the second Intifada. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics and Culture, 10 (2).Google Scholar
  84. Young, M. P. (2002). Confessional protest: the religious birth of the US national social movement. American Sociological Review, 67(5), 660–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeershebaIsrael

Personalised recommendations