Prospects for a European Identity

Article

Abstract

In several respects, the EU represents both a novel system of quasi-supranational governance and a novel form of political community or polity. But it is also a fragile construction for it remains a community still in the making with an ambiguous sense of identity and within which powerful forces are at work. This paper has three main aims: first, to stress the shifting nature of Europe’s geographical frontiers and assess whether cultural frontiers have remained more stable throughout time. In particular, it examines the main criteria, which have traditionally been employed when having to decide who should be included and excluded from Europe. A different question concerns the requirements for EU membership and the monopoly of the adjective “European” by the EU, which somehow has become to be identified with Europe. Second, to explore the prospects for the emergence of a European identity. Here, I argue that European identity stands as a “non-emotional identity” in sharp contrast with traditional forms of national identity associated with intense nationalist feelings. Third, through the analysis of the most recent Eurobarometer (annual survey of EU’s public opinion) to examine the views of Europeans regarding the EU at a time of a major global economic crisis. To conclude, the paper explores the main challenges to be faced by a still incipient European identity.

Keywords

European identity Boundaries of Europe EU image EU dissatisfaction Enlargement 

References

  1. Ashcroft, S., & Timms, N. (1992). What Europe thinks. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  2. Burgess, A. (1997). Divided Europe. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  3. Checkel, J. T., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2009). European identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, I. (2001). The post-Cold War order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Davies, N. (1997). Europe: A history. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  6. Den Boer, P. (1995). Europe to 1914: the making of an idea. In K. Wilson & J. van der Dussen (Eds.), The history of the idea of Europe (pp. 1–59). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. De Porte, A. W. (1986). Europe between the superpowers (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dinan, D. (2006). Origins and evolution of the European Union (9th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eder, K., & Spohn, W. (2005). Collective memory and European identity: the effects of integration and enlargement. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2010). Standard eurobarometer 73: Public opinion in the European Union (Spring 2010). Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/com/public-opinion/indez-en.htm
  11. European Commission. (2005). Standard eurobarometer 64: Public opinion in the European Union (Autumn 2005). Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/com/public-opinion/indez-en.htm
  12. European Commission. (2004). Standard eurobarometer 62: Public opinion in the European Union (Autumn 2004). Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/com/public-opinion/indez-en.htm
  13. Faltin, L., & Wright, M. J. (2007). The religious roots of contemporary European identity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  14. Fligstein, N. (2009). Euroclash: The EU, European identity, and the future of Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Goddard, V., Llobera, J., & Shore, C. (Eds.). (1994). The anthropology of Europe. Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
  16. Guibernau, M. (1999). Nations without states: Political communities in the global age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Guibernau, M. (2004). Anthony D. Smith on nations and national identity: a critical assessment. Nations and Nationalism, 10(1/2), 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guibernau, M. (2007). The identity of nations. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  19. Haller, M. (1999). Voiceless submission or deliberate choice? European integration and the relation between national and European identity. In H. Kriesi, K. Armingeon, H. Siegrist, & A. Wimmer (Eds.), Nation and national identity: The European experience in perspective (pp. 263–296). Zürich: Rüegger.Google Scholar
  20. Hudson, R., & Williams, A. M. (1999). Divided Europe: Society and territory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Lundestad, G. (1998). “Empire” by integration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mazower, M. (1998). Dark continent: Europe’s twentieth century. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Milward, A. (1984). The reconstruction of western Europe 1945–51. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  25. Moravcsik, A. (1999). The choice for Europe. London: UCL.Google Scholar
  26. Niblett, R., & Wallace, W. (Eds.). Rethinking European order. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  27. Nugent, N. (2006). The government and politics of the European Union (6th ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  28. Pinder, J. (1998). The building of the European Union. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Puntscher-Riekmann, S. (1998). Die kommissarische neuordnung Europas. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Scully, R. (2005). Becoming Europeans? Attitudes, behaviour and socialization in the European parliament. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, J. (2007). The transformation of citizenship in the European Union: Electoral rights and the restructuring of political space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Urwin, D. (1995). The community of Europe. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  33. Wallace, H., Wallace, W., & Pollack, M. (Eds.). (2005). Policy-making in the European Union (5th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wolton, D. (1993). La nation: Il n’y a pas d’espace public européen. In A. Compagnon & J. Seebacher (Eds.), L’Esprit de l’Europe (Vol. 2). Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  35. Young, J. W., & Kent, J. (2004). International relations since 1945: A global perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Politics and International RelationsQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations