Abstract
This essay explores the development of media systems in Central and Eastern Europe in the post-Soviet period, including the influence of social and political factors, outside media assistance, and the drive toward privatization and public service broadcasting, in an effort to understand what the experience teaches about democracy promotion, about the efficacy of various forms of media intervention, and about the utility of various forms of incentives and pressures in setting agendas and effecting political change. Despite differing historical, social, and political traditions and different forms of and reactions to media assistance efforts, factors, both exogenous (“Americanization” and “strategic communication”) and endogenous (“modernization,” secularization and commercialization), ultimately contributed to a homogenization of systems, rendering less relevant the particular distinctions among countries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
During this period, I published the Post Soviet Media Law and Policy Newsletter: http://www.vii.org/monroe/.
Paolo Mancini suggests that the Anglo-American model of journalism has become an “ideology” for professionalization and for interpretation of mass media systems (“Political complexity and alternative models of journalism: The Italian case” in Dewesternizing Media Studies , as quoted in Lauk 2008 ). Lauk further notes, during the period of transition, “it was quite natural to look for the models to emulate in the more developed Western democracies” (p. 194).
Epp Lauk points out, “The special features and ways of development of journalism cultures in each country are determined by historical traditions, as well as specific local cultural, social, and political conditions” (p. 198).
The development of media policy during the transitions of the 1990s has been described as a three-phase process of (1) de-linking the media from the state, (2) attention to market developments, involving the liberalization of telecommunications and broadcasting markets, and increased foreign investment, and (3) European integration through harmonization of media legislation (Perusko and Popovic 2008 , 169).
“[P]rivatization has increasingly become a component of conditionality requirements attached to institutional lending…seventy percent of structural adjustment loans and forty percent of sectoral adjustment loans made by the World Bank during the 1980s contained a privatization component” (Baker 1999 , pp. 233–234).
For more on Hungary’s “media wars,” see, for instance, Schwartz (2000).
References
Baker, M. (1999). Privatization in the developing world: Panacea for the economic ills of the third world or prescription overused? New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 18, 233–267.
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jakubowicz, K., & Sükösd, M. (2008). Twelve Concepts Regarding Media System Evolution and Democratization in Post-Communist Societies. In K. Jakubowicz & M. Sükösd (Eds.), Finding the right place on the map: Central and eastern european media change in a global perspective (pp. 9–40). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jakubowicz, K. (2008). Finding the Right Place on the Map: Prospects for Public Service Broadcasting in Post-Communist Countries. In K. Jakubowicz & M. Sükösd (Eds.), Finding the right place on the map: Central and eastern european media change in a global perspective (pp. 101–124). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, O. V., & Školkay, A. (2005). Media legislation and media policy in Slovakia: EU accession and the second wave of reform. Croatian Journal for Journalism & the Media, 11(2), 67–79.
Lauk, E. (2008). How will it all unfold? Media systems and journalism cultures in post-communist countries. In K. Jakubowicz & M. Sükösd (Eds.), Finding the right place on the map: Central and eastern European media change in a global perspective (pp. 193–212). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Perusko, Z., & Popovic, H. (2008). Media Concentration Trends in Central and Eastern Europe. In K. Jakubowicz & M. Sükösd (Eds.), Finding the right place on the map: Central and eastern European media change in a global perspective (pp. 165–190). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Price, M. E., & Raboy, M. (eds). (2003). Public service broadcasting in transition: A documentary reader. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Price, M. E. (1994). The market for loyalties: electronic media and the global competition for allegiances. Yale Law Journal, 104, 667–705.
Price, M. E. (1995). Television, the public sphere, and national identity. Oxford: Clarendon.
Price, M. E. (2002). Media and sovereignty: The global information revolution and its challenge to state power. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rosenbaum, J. (2003). In the EU's Image: Transformation of Broadcasting in Five Central and Eastern European Countries. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Diego, CA, May 27. Retrieved July 22, 2009, from http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/1/1/8/4/pages111848/p111848-1.php.
Schwartz, H. (2000). The struggle for constitutional justice in post-communist Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Siebert, F. S., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility, and soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Sükösd, M., & Bajomi-Lázár, P. (2003). Reinventing media: Media policy reform in East-Central Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Price, M.E. Media Transitions in the Rear-View Mirror: Some Reflections. Int J Polit Cult Soc 22, 485–496 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-009-9078-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-009-9078-4