The Phantom of the Good Soldier Švejk in the Czech Army Accession to NATO (2001–2002)

Article
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

The article is based on the author’s ethnographic fieldwork in the Czech Armed Forces (2001–2002) in which she focused on the process of military professionalization—a set of extensive institutional reforms initiated upon the Czech Republic’s accession to NATO. She shows that these reforms were not limited to the military sector and involved efforts on the part of the state officials and the media to change the position of the military in the public sphere and culture. The goal of these changes was to bring the image of seriousness to the discredited Czech military, a process that demanded the obliteration of the cultural idiom of Švejk—a literary hero of the 1920s novel by Jaroslav Hašek and the representation of a peaceful resistance to war and military violence. In the course of the twentieth century, Švejk has become one of the most pervasive cultural references of the popular laughter at oppressive military power and has been a leading cultural idiom for the Czechs during the 30 years of German and Soviet military occupations. The article shows how the current official efforts at changing the image of the Czech military focus on the obliteration of Švejk’s cultural idiom, bringing him so frequently to the public discourse that they produce a phantom-like effect in which Švejk has come to haunt the process directed at his expurgation. The established cultural idiom of skepticism toward the army and military bureaucracy thus challenges the transition from communism to democracy and questions the reliance on military force, the imagery of violent conflicts, and just wars as necessary tools of politics.

Keywords

Military Švejk Professionalization Postcommunist transformation NATO 

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cervinkova, H. (2005). Melancholic masculinity in the Czech military after socialism. In B. van Hoven & K. Hörschelmann (Eds.), Spaces of masculinity. Oxford, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Cervinkova, H. (2006a). Playing Soldiers in Bohemia: An ethnography of NATO Membership. Set Out (Prague Series in Sociocultural Anthropology), PragueGoogle Scholar
  4. Cervinkova, H. (2006b). Time to waste: Notes on the culture of the enlisted in the professionalizing Czech military. In F. Dauce & E. Sieca-Kozlowski (Eds.),  Dedovshchina in the post-Soviet military: Hazing of Russian Army conscripts in a comparative perspective. Hannover: Ibidem-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Cervinkova, H. (2009). Migs and Cadres on the move: Thoughts on the mimetic dimensions of postsocialism. In L. Kürti & P. Skalnik (Eds.), Postsocialist Europe: Anthropological perspectives from home. Oxford: Berghah.Google Scholar
  6. Cottey, A., Edmuds, T., & Forster, A. (2002). The second generation problematic: Rethinking democracy and civil-military relations in Central and Eastern Europe. Armed Forces and Society, 29, 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). 1227: Treatise on Nomadology—The war machine. In Thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (pp. 351–423). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
  8. Gabal, I. (2001). Obrana – krize se prohlubuje. Neviditelný pes , April 2.Google Scholar
  9. Gabal, I. (2002). Atlantickou, nebo habsburskou cestou? Mladá fronta DNES, July 22.Google Scholar
  10. Gabal, I., Helšusová, L., & Szayna, T. (2002). The impact of NATO membership in the Czech Republic: Changing Czech views of security, military & defence. Conflict Studies Research Centre. http://www.gac.cz/files/rep_cz.html.
  11. Hašek, J. (1973). The good soldier Švejk. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Herzfeld, M. (1997). Cultural intimacy: Social poetics in the nation-state. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Jégl, P. (1997). Česká diplomacie nemůže hledat zalíbení ve švejkovinách. Zemské noviny, September 2.Google Scholar
  14. Kopecký, P. (1997). Skoncujme se švejkovstvím. Lidové noviny. March 7.Google Scholar
  15. Mácha, P. (2001). Skupina Azalea. Aeronoviny, April 21.Google Scholar
  16. Matynia, E. (2009). Performative democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Michnik, A. (2003). Dziekujemy, Vaszku. Gazeta Wyborcza, January 2.Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Defense of the Czech Republic. (1999). Zákon č. 221/1999 Sb., o vojácích z povolání.Google Scholar
  19. Ministry of Defense of the Czech Republic. (2001). Reforma ozbrojených sil České republiky (The Reform of the Armed Forces of the Czech Republic). Prague: AVIS.Google Scholar
  20. Ministry of Defense of the Czech Republic. (2002a). Nehrajem si na vojáky: Stručný návod, jak zvládnout reformu armády. Prague.Google Scholar
  21. Ministry of Defense of the Czech Republic. (2002b). Čas něco udělat. Prague.Google Scholar
  22. Ministry of Defense of the Czech Republic. (2002c). Zítřek patří profesionálům: O reformě ozbrojených sil České republiky. Prague: AVIS.Google Scholar
  23. Růžička, M. (2001). Večer u Kalicha. Mladá Fronta DNES, February 22, p. 2.Google Scholar
  24. Šedivý, J. (1999). The Kosovo test: Are the Czechs out? Newsbrief, 19(6), 43–45.Google Scholar
  25. Simon, J. (1985). Warsaw pact forces: Problems of command and control. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  26. Simon, J. (1999). The new NATO members: Will they contribute? Strategic Forum, no. 160. Washington DC: National Defense University (Institute for National Strategic Studies).Google Scholar
  27. Spurný, J. (1998). Vstoupili jsme do NATO: Ještě se ale neví, zda s tím budou členové souhlasit. Respekt, January 4.Google Scholar
  28. Spurný, J. (2001). Stíhačka pro Švejka. Respekt, February 26.Google Scholar
  29. Ulrich, M. (1999). Democratizing communist militaries: The cases of the Czech and Russian armed forces. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ulrich, M. (2002). Developing mature national security systems in post-communist states: The Czech Republic and Slovakia. Armed Forces & Society, 28(3), 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vrána, K. (2001). Rambové versus švejci. Týden, October 8, 16–19.Google Scholar
  32. Žantovský, M. (1999). Můžeme být za mírotvorce, ale i za švejky. Lidové noviny, March 11.Google Scholar
  33. Žižka, J. (2001a). Češi z kola ven: Krizový scénář rozšíření EU. EURO, May 14.Google Scholar
  34. Žižka, J. (2001b). Lacino a bez Čechů: Šance Prahy závisí na Polsku i ochotě Západu. EURO, May 14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Institute for the Study of Culture and EducationUniversity of Lower Silesia—DSWWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations