Advertisement

Development of a 300 L Calibration Bath for Oceanographic Thermometers

  • S. BabaEmail author
  • K. Yamazawa
  • T. Nakano
  • I. Saito
  • J. Tamba
  • T. Wakimoto
  • K. Katoh
TEMPMEKO 2016
  • 110 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. TEMPMEKO 2016: Selected Papers of the 13th International Symposium on Temperature, Humidity, Moisture and Thermal Measurements in Industry and Science

Abstract

The Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) has been developing a 300 L calibration bath to calibrate 24 oceanographic thermometers (OT) simultaneously and thereby reduce the calibration work load necessary to service more than 180 OT every year. This study investigated characteristics of the developed 300 L calibration bath using a SBE 3plus thermometer produced by an OT manufacturer. We also used 11 thermistor thermometers that were calibrated to be traceable to the international temperature scale of 1990 (ITS-90) within 1 mK of standard uncertainty through collaboration of JAMSTEC and NMIJ/AIST. Results show that the time stability of temperature of the developed bath was within \(\pm 1 \,\hbox {mK}\). Furthermore, the temperature uniformity was \(\pm 1.3 \,\hbox {mK}\). The expanded uncertainty (\(k=2\)) components for the characteristics of the developed 300 L calibration bath were estimated as 2.9 mK, which is much less than the value of 10 mK: the required specification for uncertainty of calibration for the OT. These results demonstrated the utility of this 300 L calibration bath as a device for use with a new calibration system.

Keywords

Calibration bath Comparison calibration Stability Uncertainty Uniformity Water temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We greatly appreciate comments related to the scientific background of this study by Iwao Ueki. We also thank Shoko Tatamisashi and Koki Uda (Marine Works Japan Ltd.) for operating this calibration bath and for assisting with temperature accuracy measurements in the bath.

References

  1. 1.
    Climate and Ocean–Variability, Predictability, and Change, CLIVAR Initial Implementation Plan, pp. 38 (1998). http://www.clivar.org/node/255. Accessed 02 Feb 2017
  2. 2.
    World Climate Research Programme, WCRP Informal Report No. 5, pp34 (2006). http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/gtmba/files/rama/IndOOS_Plan.pdf. Accessed 02 Feb 2017
  3. 3.
    Bureau International des Poids Measures, 24th Meeting (2011) Resolutions 2. http://www.bipm.org/en/CGPM/db/24/2/. Accessed 16 August 2016
  4. 4.
    Sea-Bird Electronics, Inc., Profiling CTDs: SBE 911plusCTD: Documents: 911plusbrochureJun16.pdf. http://www.seabird.com/sites/default/files/documents/911plusbrochureJun16.pdf. Accessed 16 August 2016
  5. 5.
    R.E.G. Webb, H.T. Robinson, J. Phys. E: Sci. Inst. 6, 27–29 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Saino, K. Koizumi, S. Amano, Bull. NRLM 29, 21–26 (1974)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fluke Incorporated, Temperature calibration equipment and services (2008), pp. 112–113Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Baba, K. Yamazawa, J. Tamba, T. Wakimoto, K. Katoh, Trans. JSME 81, 1–14 (2015). [in Japanese]Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Matsumoto, T. Nagahama, K. Ando, I. Ueki, Y. Kuroda, Y. Takatsuki, JAMSTECR 44, 139–151 (2001). [in Japanese] Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, Evaluation of measurement data–Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Bureau International des Poids Measures, JCGM 100: (2008), (GUM 1995 with minor corrections), pp. 1–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC)YokosukaJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of Technology and EvaluationTokyoJapan
  3. 3.National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ)AISTTsukubaJapan
  4. 4.Osaka City UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations