NRC Microwave Refractive Index Gas Thermometry Implementation Between 24.5 K and 84 K
- 154 Downloads
Abstract
The implementation of microwave refractive index gas thermometry at the National Research Council between 24.5 K and 84 K is reported. A new gas-handling system for accurate control and measurement of experimental gas pressure has been constructed, and primary thermometry measurements have been taken using a quasi-spherical copper resonator and helium gas at temperatures corresponding to three defining fixed points of the International Temperature Scale of 1990 (ITS-90). These measurements indicate differences between the thermodynamic temperature T and ITS-90 temperature \(T_{90}\) of \(\left( T - T_{90} \right) = -0.60 \pm 0.56\) mK at \(T_{90} = 24.5561\) K, \(\left( T - T_{90} \right) = -2.0 \pm 1.3\) mK at \(T_{90} = 54.3584\) K, and \(\left( T - T_{90} \right) = -4.0 \pm 2.9\) mK at \(T_{90} = 83.8058\) K. The present results at \(T_{90} = 24.5561\) K and \(T_{90} = 83.8058\) K agree with previously reported measurements from other primary thermometry techniques of acoustic gas thermometry and dielectric constant gas thermometry, and the result at \(T_{90} = 54.3584\) K provides new information in a temperature region where there is a gap in other recent data sets.
Keywords
Polarizing gas thermometry Primary thermometry Refractive index gas thermometry RIGT Thermodynamic temperature \(T - T_{90}\)Notes
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for the loan of the copper resonator used in this study; T.A. Quance and D.W. Woods for technical assistance with the gas-handling system and pressure balance; I. Yang for mass spectrometer gas analysis; and L. Pitre, M. de Podesta, M.R. Moldover, R.M. Gavioso, C. Gaiser, J.W. Schmidt, K.D. Hill, A.D.W. Todd and S.N. Dedyulin for useful discussions.
References
- 1.H. Preston-Thomas, Metrologia 27, 3 (1990). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/27/1/002 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.H. Preston-Thomas, Metrologia 27, 107 (1990). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/27/2/010 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.J. Fischer, M. de Podesta, K.D. Hill, M. Moldover, L. Pitre, R. Rusby, P. Steur, O. Tamura, R. White, L. Wolber, Int. J. Thermophys. 32, 12 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s10765-011-0922-1 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.R.M. Gavioso, D.M. Ripa, P.P.M. Steur, C. Gaiser, T. Zandt, B. Fellmuth, M. de Podesta, R. Underwood, G. Sutton, L. Pitre, F. Sparasci, L. Risegari, L. Gianfrani, A. Castrillo, G. Machin, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20150046 (2016). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0046 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.L. Pitre, M.R. Moldover, W.L. Tew, Metrologia 43, 142 (2006). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/43/1/020 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.M.R. Moldover, R.M. Gavioso, J.B. Mehl, L. Pitre, M. de Podesta, J.T. Zhang, Metrologia 51, R1 (2014). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/51/1/R1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.R. Underwood, M. de Podesta, G. Sutton, L. Stanger, R. Rusby, P. Harris, P. Morantz, G. Machin, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20150048 (2016). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0048 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.C. Gaiser, T. Zandt, B. Fellmuth, Metrologia 52, S217 (2015). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/52/5/S217 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.C. Gaiser, B. Fellmuth, N. Haft, Metrologia 54, 141 (2017). doi: 10.1088/1681-7575/aa5389 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.A.R. Colclough, Metrologia 10, 73 (1974). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/10/2/006 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.R.L. Rusby, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. Eur. Conf. Temp. Meas. 26, 44 (1975)Google Scholar
- 12.E.F. May, L. Pitre, J.B. Mehl, M.R. Moldover, J.W. Schmidt, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 75, 3307 (2004). doi: 10.1063/1.1791831 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.J.W. Schmidt, R.M. Gavioso, E.F. May, M.R. Moldover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 254504 (2007). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.254504 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.P.M.C. Rourke, K.D. Hill, Int. J. Thermophys. 36, 205 (2015). doi: 10.1007/s10765-014-1728-8 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.B. Gao, L. Pitre, E.C. Luo, M.D. Plimmer, P. Lin, J.T. Zhang, X.J. Feng, Y.Y. Chen, F. Sparasci, Measurement 103, 258 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.02.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.M.R. Moldover, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 103, 167 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.A.G. Steele, The International Seminar on Low Temperature Thermometry and Dynamic Temperature Measurement, ed. by A. Szmyrka-Grzebyk (Wroclaw, 1997), pp L48–L53Google Scholar
- 18.P.M.C. Rourke, Metrologia 53, L1 (2016). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/53/2/L1 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.T. Tomaru, T. Suzuki, T. Haruyama, T. Shintomi, A. Yamamoto, T. Koyama, R. Li, Cryogenics 44, 309 (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.02.003 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.G. Ventura, L. Risegari, The Art of Cryogenics (Elsevier, Oxford, 2008). [ISBN:978-0-08-044479-6]Google Scholar
- 21.SAES MC1-902 specifications, document S110-472_H, DCN 4624. http://www.saespuregas.com (2016)
- 22.I. Yang, L. Pitre, M.R. Moldover, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J.S. Kim, Metrologia 52, S394 (2015). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/52/5/S394 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.K.D. Hill, M. Gotoh, Metrologia 33, 307 (1996). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/33/4/4 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.K.D. Hill, A.G. Steele, Metrologia 42, 278 (2005). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/42/4/013 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Supplementary Information for the International Temperature Scale of 1990, Sèvres, Bureau International de Poids et Mesures, 1997 re-printing. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/ITS-90/ITS-90-Supplementary-Info-1997.zip; ISBN:92-822-2111-3 (1990)
- 26.Guide to the Realization of the ITS-90: chapter 4. Interpolating Constant-Volume Gas Thermometry, Sèvres, Bureau International de Poids et Mesures, revised 19 March 2015. http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/ITS-90/Guide-ITS-90-GasThermometry-2015.pdf (2015)
- 27.N.J. Simon, E.S. Drexler, R.P. Reed, Properties of Copper and Copper Alloys at Cryogenic Temperatures (NIST Monograph 177, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 1992)Google Scholar
- 28.NIST Cryogenic Materials Properties Database, OFHC Copper (UNS C10100/C10200) entry, revised 02/03/2010. http://cryogenics.nist.gov/MPropsMAY/OFHC%20Copper/OFHC_Copper_rev1.htm (2010)
- 29.B. Podobedov, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 044401 (2009). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.044401 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.J.G. Hust, A.B. Lankford, Natl. Bur. Stand. Intern. Rep. NBSIR 84, 3007 (1984)Google Scholar
- 31.M. Puchalski, K. Piszczatowski, J. Komasa, B. Jeziorski, K. Szalewicz, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032515 (2016). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032515 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.A. Rizzo, C. Hättig, B. Fernández, H. Koch, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 2609 (2002). doi: 10.1063/1.1491402 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.R. Moszynski, T.G.A. Heijmen, A. van der Avoird, Chem. Phys. Lett. 247, 440 (1995). doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(95)01271-0 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.D.F. Heller, W.M. Gelbart, Chem. Phys. Lett. 27, 359 (1974). doi: 10.1016/0009-2614(74)90241-3 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.E.C. Kerr, R.H. Sherman, J. Low Temp. Phys. 3, 451 (1970). doi: 10.1007/BF00628215 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.S. Kirouac, T.K. Bose, J. Chem. Phys. 64, 1580 (1976). doi: 10.1063/1.432383 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.M. Lallemand, D. Vidal, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 4776 (1977). doi: 10.1063/1.433839 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.M.P. White, D. Gugan, Metrologia 29, 37 (1992). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/29/1/006 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.L.W. Bruch, F. Weinhold, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 8667 (2000). doi: 10.1063/1.1318766 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.P.J. Mohr, D.B. Newell, B.N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035009 (2016). doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035009 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.W. Cencek, M. Przybytek, J. Komasa, J.B. Mehl, B. Jeziorski, K. Szalewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 224303 (2012). doi: 10.1063/1.4712218 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.G. Garberoglio, M.R. Moldover, A.H. Harvey, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 116, 729 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.K.R.S. Shaul, A.J. Schultz, D.A. Kofke, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 184101 (2012). doi: 10.1063/1.4764857 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.G. Łach, B. Jeziorski, K. Szalewicz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 233001 (2004). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.233001 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.W. Cencek, J. Komasa, K. Szalewicz, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 014301 (2011). doi: 10.1063/1.3603968 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.W.C. Overton, J. Gaffney, Phys. Rev. 98, 969 (1955). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.98.969 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.H.M. Ledbetter, E.R. Naimon, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 3, 897 (1974). doi: 10.1063/1.3253150 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.J.R. Frederick, Thesis, University of Michigan (1947)Google Scholar
- 49.H.M. Ledbetter, Phys. Status Solidi A 66, 477 (1981). doi: 10.1002/pssa.2210660209 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.C. Gaiser, B. Fellmuth, Phys. Status Solidi B 253, 1549 (2016). doi: 10.1002/pssb.201552717 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.A.H. Harvey, E.W. Lemmon, Int. J. Thermophys. 26, 31 (2005). doi: 10.1007/s10765-005-2351-5 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.R. Cuccaro, R.M. Gavioso, G. Benedetto, D. Madonna Ripa, V. Fernicola, C. Guianvarc’h, Int. J. Thermophys. 33, 1352 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s10765-011-1007-x ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.R.E. Honig, H.O. Hook, RCA Rev. 21, 360 (1960)Google Scholar
- 54.C. Gaiser, B. Fellmuth, EPL 90, 63002 (2010). doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/90/63002 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 55.A.G. Steele, B. Fellmuth, D.I. Head, Y. Hermier, K.H. Kang, P.P.M. Steur, W.L. Tew, Metrologia 39, 551 (2002). doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/39/6/6 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar