Advertisement

Characterization of the Humidity Calibration Chamber by Numerical Simulations

  • J. SalminenEmail author
  • H. Sairanen
  • P. Grahn
  • R. Högström
  • A. Lakka
  • M. Heinonen
TEMPMEKO 2016
  • 255 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. TEMPMEKO 2016: Selected Papers of the 13th International Symposium on Temperature, Humidity, Moisture and Thermal Measurements in Industry and Science

Abstract

At the Centre for Metrology MIKES of VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT MIKES), we have been developing a humidity calibration apparatus for radiosondes within an EMRP Project Metrology for Essential Climate Variables. The minimum air temperature and absolute humidity are \(-80\,^{\circ }\hbox {C}\) and 2.576 \(\times \) \(10^{-4} \,\hbox {g}\cdot \hbox {m}^{-3}\) (corresponding the dew-point temperature \(-90\,^{\circ }\hbox {C}\)), respectively. Recent developments for the apparatus extend its pressure operation range down to 7 hPa (abs). When operating in such dry conditions, the efficiency in calibration is highly limited by the time of humidity stabilization in a measurement chamber: Because the water vapor pressure is very low, the adsorption and desorption of water molecules at the chamber walls have a significant effect on the spatial and temporal humidity differences in the chamber. Inhomogeneity in humidity field inside the calibration chamber increases calibration uncertainty. In order to understand how varying parameters such as pressure, temperature, inflow speed and geometry of chamber effect on stabilization time of humidity field, computational fluid dynamics simulations were developed using Comsol software. Velocity and pressure of fluid, water vapor diffusion, temperature as well as adsorption/desorption of water molecules on the chamber walls were included in the simulations. Adsorption and desorption constants for water on the measurement chamber wall were determined experimentally. The results show that the flow speed and the surface area are the dominant parameters affecting the stabilization time of a calibration chamber. It was also discovered that more homogenous water vapor concentration field is obtained at low pressures.

Keywords

Calibration Calibration chamber Comsol FEM Finite element method Humidity calibration Multiphysics Simulation Surface chemistry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out within the European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP) project “Metrology for Essential Climate Variables.” The EMRP is jointly funded by the EMRP participating countries within EURAMET and the European Union.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Sairanen, M. Heinonen, R. Högström, A. Lakka, H. Kajastie, A calibration system for reference radiosondes that meets GRUAN uncertainty measurement. NCSLI Measure J. Meas. Sci 9, 56–60 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Sairanen, M. Heinonen, R. Högström, Validation of a calibration set-up for radiosondes to fulfil GRUAN requirements. Meas. Sci. Technol. (2015). doi: 10.1088/09570233/25/3/035301
  3. 3.
    W.M. Organization, The GCOS Reference Upper-Air Network (GRUAN) GUIDE, Geneva (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Lakka, H. Sairanen, M. Heinonen, R. Högström, Comsol simulations as a tool in validating a measurement chamber. Int. J. Thermophys. 36, 3474–3486 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Lafferty, Foundations of Vacuum Science and Technology (1998). http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0471175935.html
  6. 6.
    E. McCash, Surface Chemistry, 1st edn (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Iqbal, Interaction of molecular contaminants with low-k dielectric films and metal surfaces. Ph.D. Dissertation (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Asad Mahmood, Measurement and control of impurity distribution in ultra pure gas delivery systems. Ph.D Dissertation, The University of Arizona (1993)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Salminen
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. Sairanen
    • 1
  • P. Grahn
    • 2
  • R. Högström
    • 1
  • A. Lakka
    • 3
  • M. Heinonen
    • 1
  1. 1.VTT Technical Research Centre Ltd., Centre for Metrology MIKESEspooFinland
  2. 2.Comsol OyHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Aalto University, School of Electrical EngineeringEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations