International Journal of Thermophysics

, Volume 33, Issue 6, pp 1082–1099 | Cite as

The Effect of Mechanical Force on Generalized Thermoelasticity in a Fiber-Reinforcement Under Three Theories

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The present paper is concerned with effect of mechanical force on generalized thermoelasticity in a fiber-reinforcement. The formulation is applied to generalized thermoelasticity based on the coupled theory, Lord–Shulman theory, and Green–Lindsay theory. The analytical expression of the displacement components, stresses, and temperature are obtained in the physical domain and illustrated graphically using normal mode analysis. Comparisons are made among the three theories for the field quantities in the absence and in the presence of a fiber-reinforcement as well as for different values of mechanical force.

Keywords

(CD) theory (G–L) theory (L–S) theory Mechanical force Reinforcement Thermoelastic 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nowacki W.: Thermoelasticity. Addison-Wesley, London (1958)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nowinski J.: Theory of Thermoelasticity with Applications, pp. 826. Setoff and Noord-hoff, Alphen ann den Rijn (1978)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belfield A.J., Rogers T.G., Spencer A.J.M.: J. Mech. Phys. Solids 31, 25 (1983)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verma P.D.S., Rana O.H.: Mech. Mater. 2, 353 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sengupta P.R., Nath S.: Sãdhanã 26, 363 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hashin Z., Rosen W.B.: J. Appl. Mech. 31, 223 (1964)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Singh B., Singh S.J.: Sãdhanã 29, 249 (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pradhan A., Samal S.K., Mahanti N.C.: Tamkang J. Sci. Eng. 6, 173 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chattopadhyay A., Venkateswarlu R.L.K., Saha S.: Sãdhanã 27, 613 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verma P.D.S.: Int. J. Eng. Sci. 24, 1067 (1986)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahmed S.M.: Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 23, 627 (2000)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    El-Naggar A.M., Abd-Alla A.M., Ahmed S.M.: Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc. 86, 51 (1994)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abd-Alla A.M., Mahmoud S.R., Abo-Dahab S.M., Helmy M.I.: Appl. Math. Sci. 4, 91 (2010)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Othman M.I.A., Abbas I.A.: Meccanica 46, 413 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lord H.W., Şhulman Y.: J. Mech. Phys. Solid 15, 299 (1967)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Green A.E., Lindsay K.A.: J. Elast. 2, 1 (1972)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Othman M.I.A.: Int. J. Solids Struct. 41, 2939 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Othman M.I.A., Lotfy Kh.: Multidiscip. Model. Mater. Struct. 5, 235 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Othman M.I.A., Song Y.Q.: Multidisciplinary Model. Mater. Struct. 5, 43 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singh B.: Arch. Appl. Mech. 75, 513 (2006)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Montanaro A.: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 1586 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceZagazig UniversityZagazigEgypt

Personalised recommendations