Advertisement

Low Resistance of Senior Resident Females Toward Female Immigration in Bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, Democratic Republic of the Congo

  • Kazuya TodaEmail author
  • Takeshi Furuichi
Article

Abstract

Female aggression against outgroup conspecifics is an important aspect of intergroup relationships among female primates. Intense aggression from resident females toward immigrant females suggests that the costs of intrasexual competition outweigh the benefits of group living and has been reported in some species with female transfer. In bonobos (Pan paniscus), however, immigrant females are likely to integrate smoothly into an unfamiliar group through affiliative interactions with specific older females. We hypothesized that older resident females gain an indirect benefit from female immigration by increased mating opportunities for their philopatric sons. We examined the effects of 1) age and tenure and 2) the presence of adolescent or adult sons on the probability of aggression by resident females against immigrant females. We collected 73 instances of dyadic agonistic interactions between 14 female bonobos at Wamba, Democratic Republic of the Congo, for five different periods between November 2014 and June 2018, which included four immigrant females with a group tenure of <2.5 years. The female dominance hierarchy correlated with age and tenure, the slope of the hierarchy was weak but statistically significant, and the hierarchy was not linear. We found that the rate of aggression against immigrant females decreased with age in resident females but was unrelated to the presence of mature sons. Our findings suggest that the cost imposed by female immigration varies among resident females, and that social tolerance to immigrant females may be associated with low feeding competition rather than any future benefits.

Keywords

Age difference Dominance hierarchy Female transfer Intrasexual aggression Pan paniscus Social tolerance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Ministry of Scientific Research of the DRC. for permission to conduct bonobo research and the Research Center for Ecology and Forestry of that Ministry in the DRC. for their supports of our field studies in the Luo Scientific Reserve. We are particularly grateful to local assistants for their help with our field studies and villagers for allowing us to stay at Wamba. We sincerely appreciate the members of Wamba Committee for Bonobo Research, especially Dr. T. Sakamaki, Dr. S. Yamamoto, Dr. H. Ryu, Dr. N. Tokuyama, and Mr. S. Ishizuka. Finally, we are really grateful to two anonymous reviewers, the guest editor, Dr. C. C. Grueter, and editor-in-chief, Dr. J. M. Setchell, for their valuable comments and significant suggestions on early versions of the article. This study was financially supported (to KT) by The Leading Program in Primatology and Wildlife Science of Kyoto University and a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research by the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (17J01336), and a Young Explores Grant from the National Geographic Foundation for Science and Exploration (Asia 38-16).

Author Contributions

KT conducted fieldwork and data analysis. KT and TF wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Asensio, N., Schaffner, C. M., & Aureli, F. (2015). Quality and overlap of individual core areas are related to group tenure in female spider monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 77, 777–785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badrian, A. J., & Badrian, N. L. (1984). Social organization of Pan paniscus in the Lomako forest, Zaire. In R. L. Susman (Ed.), The pygmy chimpanzee: Evolutionary biology and behavior (pp. 325–346). New York and London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, L., Gyanor, D., & Henzi, S. P. (2002). A dynamic interaction between aggression and grooming reciprocity among female chacma baboons. Animal Behavior, 63, 1047–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed- effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman, C. M. (2017). Maternal inheritance of rank. In F. Agustin (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of primatology (Vol. II, pp. 777–779). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Borries, C., Sommer, V., & Srivastava, A. (1991). Dominance, age, and reproductive success in free-ranging female Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus). International Journal of Primatology, 12, 231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheney, D. L. (1992). Intragroup cohesion and intergroup hostility: The relation between grooming distributions and intergroup competition among female primates. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 334–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. David, H. A. (1987). Ranking from unbalanced paired-comparison data. Biometrika, 74, 432–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Vries, H. (1995). An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or ties relationships. Animal Behavior, 50, 1375–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Vries, H. (1998). Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: A new procedure and review. Animal Behavior, 55, 827–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Vries, H., Stevens, J. M. G., & Vervaecke, H. (2006). Measuring and testing the steepness of dominance hierarchies. Animal Behavior, 71, 585–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Waal, F. B. M. (1988). The communicative repertoire of captive bonobos (Pan paniscus), compared to that of chimpanzees. Behavior, 106, 183–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dobson, A. J., & Bernett, A. G. (2008). An introduction to generalized linear models, third edition. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  14. Emery Thompson, M., Kahlenberg, S. M., Gilby, I. C., & Wrangham, R. W. (2007). Core area quality is associated with variance in reproductive success among female chimpanzees at Kibale National Park. Animal Behaviour, 73, 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eriksson, J., Siedel, H., Lukas, D., Kayser, M., Erler, A., et al (2006). Y-chromosome analysis confirms highly sex-biased dispersal and suggests a low male effective population size in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Molecular Ecology, 15, 939–949.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faraway, J. J. (2006). Extending the linear model with R. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  17. Foerster, S., Franz, M., Murray, C. M., Gilby, I. C., Feldblum, J. T., et al (2016). Chimpanzee females queue but males compete for social status. Scientific Reports, 6, 35404.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forcina, G., Vallet, D., Le Gouar, P. J., Bernardo-Madrid, R., Illera, G., et al (2019). From groups to communities in western lowland gorillas. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 286, 20182019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2018). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  20. Furuichi, T. (1989). Social interactions and the life history of female Pan paniscus in Wamba, Zaire. International Journal of Primatology, 10, 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Furuichi, T. (1997). Agonistic interactions and matrifocal dominance rank of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. International Journal of Primatology, 18, 855–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furuichi, T. (2011). Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society. Evolutionary Anthropology, 20, 131–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Furuichi, T., Idani, G., Ihobe, H., Hashimoto, C., Tashiro, Y., et al (2012). Long-term studies on wild bonobos at Wamba, Luo scientific reserve, D. R. Congo: Towards the understanding of female life history in a male-philopatric species. In P. M. Kappeler & D. P. Watts (Eds.), Long-term field studies of primates (pp. 413–433). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gillespie, T. R., & Chapman, C. A. (2001). Determinants of group size in the red colobus monkey (Procolobus badius): an evaluation of the generality of the ecological-constraints model. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 329–338.Google Scholar
  25. Grueter, C. C., Matsuda, I., Zhang, P., & Zinner, D. (2012). Multilevel societies in primates and other mammals: Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Primatology, 33, 993–1001.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harcourt, A. H., & de Waal, F. B. M. (1992). Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Harcourt, A. H., & Greenberg, J. (2001). Do gorilla females join males to avoid infanticide? A quantitative model. Animal Behaviors, 62, 905–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hashimoto, C., Furuichi, T., & Tashiro, Y. (1997). Context and development of sexual behavior of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, Zaire. International Journal of Primatology, 18, 1–21.Google Scholar
  29. Hashimoto, C. (2001). What factors affect the size of chimpanzee parties in the Kalinzu forest, Uganda? Examination of fruit abundance and number of estrous females. International Journal of Primatology, 22, 947–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hashimoto, C., Tashiro, Y., Hibino, E., Mulavwa M., Yangozene K., et al. (2008). Longitudinal structures of a unit-group of bonobos: Male philopatry and possible fusion of unit-groups. In T. Furuichi & J. Thompson (Eds.), The bonobos: Behavior, ecology, and conservation (pp. 107–119). Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
  31. Idani, G. (1991). Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba. Folio Primatology, 57, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Isbell, L. A., & van Vuren, D. (1996). Differential costs of locational and social dispersal and their consequences for female group-living primates. Behaviour, 133, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ishizuka, S., Kawamoto, Y., Sakamaki, T., Tokuyama, N., Toda, K., et al (2018). Paternity and kin structure among neighboring groups in wild bonobos at Wamba. Royal Society Open Science, 5, 171006.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kahlenberg, S. M., Emery Thompson, M., Muller, M. N., & Wrangham, R. W. (2008a). Immigration costs for female chimpanzees and male protection as an immigrant counterstrategy to intrasexual aggression. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1497–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahlenberg, S. M., Emery Thompson, M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2008b). Female competition over core areas in Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii, Kibale National Park, Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 29, 931–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kano, T. (1992). The last ape: Pigmy chimpanzee behavior and ecology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kinnaird, M. F. (1992). Variable resource defense by the Tana River crested mangabey. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuroda, S. (1979). Grouping of the pygmy chimpanzees. Primates, 20, 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Landau, H. G. (1951). On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. effect of inherent characteristics. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 13, 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee, P. C., & Strier, K. B. (2015). Complexities of understanding female dispersal in primates. In T. Furuichi, J. Yamagiwa, & F. Aureli (Eds.), Dispersing primate females: Life history and social strategies in male-philopatric species (pp. 215–230). Tokyo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moore, J. (1984). Female transfer in primates. International Journal of Primatology, 5, 537–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moscovice, L. R., Douglas, P. H., Martinez-Inigo, L., Surbeck, M., Vigilant, L., & Hohmann, G. (2017). Stable and fluctuating social preferences and implications for cooperation among female bonobos at LuiKotale, Salonga National Park, DRC. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 163, 158–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nurmi, N. O., Hohmann, G., Goldstone, L. G., Deschner, T., & Schulke, O. (2018). The “tolerant chimpanzees”–towards the costs and benefits of sociality in female bonobos. Behavioral Ecology, 29, 1325–1339.Google Scholar
  44. Parish, A. R. (1994). Sex and food control in the “uncommon chimpanzee”: How bonobo females overcome a phylogenetic legacy of male dominance. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parish, A. R. (1996). Female relationships in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Human Nature, 7, 61–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Parker, G. A. (1974). Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 223–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Printes, R. C., & Strier, K. B. (1999). Behavioral correlates of dispersal in female muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides). International Journal of Primatology, 20, 941–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quinn, G. P., Keough, M. J. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
  50. Riveros, J. A., Schaffner, C. M., & Aureli, F. (2017). You are not welcome: Social exchanges between female spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). International Journal of Primatolgy, 38, 857–871.Google Scholar
  51. Robbins, M. M., Robbins, A. M., Gerald-Steklis, N., & Steklis, H. D. (2005). Long-term dominance relationships in female mountain gorillas: Strength, stability and determinants of rank. Behaviour, 142, 779–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robinson, J. G. (1988). Group size in wedge-capped capuchin monkeys Cebus olivaceus and the reproductive success of males and females. Behavioral Ecology and Sociology, 23, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sakamaki, T., Behncke, I., Laporte, M., Mulvwa, M., Ryu, H., et al (2015). Intergroup transfer of females and social relationships between immigrants and residents in bonobos (Pan paniscus) societies. In T. Furuichi, J. Yamagiwa, & F. Aureli (Eds.), Dispersing primate females: Life history and social strategies in male-philopatric species (pp. 127–164). Tokyo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sakamaki, T., Ryu, H., Toda, K., Tokuyama, N., & Furuichi, T. (2018). Increased frequency of intergroup encounters in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) around the yearly peak in fruit abundance at Wamba. International Journal of Primatology, 39, 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sterck, E. H. M., Watts, D. P., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997). The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 209–301.Google Scholar
  56. Stevens, J. M. G., Vervaecke, H., de Vries, H., & van Elsacker, L. (2007). Sex differences in the steepness of dominance hierarchies in captive bonobo groups. International Journal of Primatology, 28, 1417–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stokes, E. J. (2004). Within-group social relationships among females and adult males in wild western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). American Journal of Primatology, 54, 233–246. Surbeck, M., Boesch, C., Crockford, C., Emery Thompson, M., Furuichi, T., et al (2019). Males with a mother living in their group have higher paternity success in bonobos but not chimpanzees. Current Biology, 29, R341–R357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Surbeck, M., & Hohmann, G. (2013). Intersexual dominance relationships and the influence of leverage on the outcome of conflicts in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus). Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology, 67, 1767–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Surbeck, M., Mundry, R., & Hohhman, G. (2011). Mothers matter! Maternal support, dominance status and mating success in male bonobos (Pan paniscus). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 590–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Terada, S., Nackoney, J., Sakamaki, T., Norbert, M., Mulavwa, M. N., et al (2015). Habitat use of bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba: Selection of vegetation types for ranging, feeding, and night-sleeping. American Journal of Primatology, 77, 701–713.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thompson-Handler, N. (1990). The pygmy chimpanzee: Sociosexual behavior, reproductive biology and life history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Tokuyama, N., & Furuichi, T. (2016). Do friends help each other? Patterns of female coalition formation in wild bonobos at Wamba. Animal Behavior, 119, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tokuyama, N., & Furuichi, T. (2017). Leadership of old females in collective departures in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tokuyama, N., Sakamaki, T., & Furuichi, T. (2019). Inter-group aggressive interaction patterns indicate male mate defense and female cooperation across bonobo groups at Wamba, Democratic Republic of the Congo. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. van Noordwijk, M. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (1999). The effects of dominance rank and group size on female lifetime reproductive success in wild long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Primates, 40, 105–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vogel, E. R., Munch, S. B., & Janson, C. H. (2007). Understanding escalated aggression over food resources in white-faced capuchin monkeys. Animal Behavior, 74, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Walker, K. K., Walker, C. S., Goodall, J., & Pusey, A. E. (2018). Maturation is prolonged and variable in female chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution, 114, 131–140.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Watts, D. P. (1991). Harassment of immigrant female mountain gorillas by resident females. Ecology, 89, 135–153.Google Scholar
  69. Watts, D. P. (1994). Social relationships of immigrant and resident female mountain gorillas, II: Relatedness, residence, and relationships between females. American Journal of Primatology, 32, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. White, F. J. (1988). Party composition and dynamics in Pan paniscus. International Journal of Primatology, 9, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. White, F. J., & Wrangham, R. W. (1988). Feeding competition and patch size in the chimpanzee species Pan paniscus and Pan troglodytes. Behaviour, 105, 148–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour, 75, 262–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yamamoto, S. (2015). Non-reciprocal but peaceful fruit sharing in wild bonobos in Wamba. Behavior, 152, 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., & Elphick, C. S. (2010). A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. A., & Smith, G. M. (2009). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Department of Ecology and Social BehaviorPrimate Research Institute, Kyoto UniversityInuyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations