Advertisement

Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus and Hybrid) and Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) Modify Their Visual, but Not Auditory, Communicative Behaviors, Depending on the Attentional State of a Human Experimenter

  • Jennifer BottingEmail author
  • Meredith Bastian
Article

Abstract

The ability to judge the visual attention of others is a key aspect of human social cognition and communication. While evidence has shown that chimpanzees can discriminate human attention based on eye cues alone, findings for gorillas and orangutans have been less consistent. In addition, it is currently unclear whether these gorillas and orangutans attempt to attract the visual attention of inattentive recipients using “attention-getting” behaviors. We replicated and extended previous work by testing whether six orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus and hybrid) and six gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) modified the use of their visual and auditory signals based on the attentional state of a human experimenter. We recorded all communicative behaviors produced by the apes for 30 s while a human experimenter stood in front of them with a food reward in a variety of postures, both visually attentive (facing the apes) and inattentive (body and/or head facing away or eyes covered). Both species produced visual behaviors more often when the experimenter was looking at them than when she had her face turned away, but only the orangutans discriminated attention based on eye cues alone. When we removed human-reared apes from the analyses (N = 3), mother-reared apes showed sensitivity to eye cues from the experimenter. However, further analyses found that the orangutans and gorillas relied more heavily on the body and head orientation of the experimenter than on her eye cues. Neither species produced more vocalizations or nonvocal auditory behaviors, such as mesh and object banging, mesh rubbing, or clapping, in the inattentive, than attentive, conditions. Our results reveal that while orangutans and gorillas preferentially use visual gestures when a human is attending to them, they do not appear to produce auditory behaviors, including vocalizations, with the intention of manipulating the recipient’s attention state.

Keywords

Attribution of perception Gorilla Orangutan Social cognition Visual attention 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a generous grant from the David Bohnett Foundation. The authors would like to thank the staff at the Smithsonian’s National Zoo for their assistance during data collection and are additionally grateful to Betsy Herrelko and Alexandra Reddy for advice and assistance with behavioral coding. Our thanks go to Jo Setchell and two anonymous reviewers whose constructive suggestions greatly improved the final manuscript.

Supplementary material

10764_2019_83_MOESM1_ESM.docx (93 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 93 kb)

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bania, A. E., & Stromberg, E. E. (2013). The effect of body orientation on judgments of human visual attention in western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 127(1), 82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chung, Y., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Dorie, V., Gelman, A., & Liu, J. (2013). A nondegenerate penalized likelihood estimator for variance parameters in multilevel models. Psychometrika, 78(4), 685–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costes-Thiré, M., Levé, M., Uhlrich, P., De Marco, A., & Thierry, B. (2014). Lack of evidence that Tonkean macaques understand what others can hear. Animal Cognition, 18, 251–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014-0795-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Friard, O., & Gamba, M. (2016). BORIS: A free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(11), 1325–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Genty, E., Breuer, T., Hobaiter, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2009). Gestural communication of the gorilla (Gorilla gorilla): Repertoire, intentionality and possible origins. Animal Cognition, 12(3), 527–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gómez, J. C. (1996). Non-human primate theories of (non-human primate) minds: Some issues concerning the origins of mind-reading. In P. Carruthers & P. K. Smith (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind (pp. 330–343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gómez, J. C. (2009). Apes, monkeys, children, and the growth of mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gretscher, H., Haun, D. B., Liebal, K., & Kaminski, J. (2012). Orang-utans rely on orientation cues and egocentric rules when judging others' perspectives in a competitive food task. Animal behaviour, 84(2), 323–331.Google Scholar
  11. Harcourt, A. H., Stewart, K. J., & Hauser, M. (1993). Functions of wild gorilla “close” calls. I. Repertoire, context, and interspecific comparison. Behavior, 124(1), 89–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardus, M. E., Lameira, A. R., Singleton, I., Morrogh-Bernard, H. C., Knott, C. D., et al (2009). A description of the orangutan’s vocal and sound repertoire, with a focus on geographic variation. In S. A. Wich, S. S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia, & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 49–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hare, B., Call, J., Agnetta, B., & Tomasello, M. (2000). Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Animal Behavior, 59(4), 771–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hattori, Y., Kuroshima, H., & Fujita, K. (2010). Tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) show understanding of human attentional states when requesting food held by a human. Animal Cognition, 13(1), 87–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.Google Scholar
  16. Hopkins, W. D., Taglialatela, J. P., & Leavens, D. A. (2007). Chimpanzees differentially produce novel vocalizations to capture the attention of a human. Animal Behavior, 73(2), 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hostetter, A. B., Cantero, M., & Hopkins, W. D. (2001). Differential use of vocal and gestural communication by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in response to the attentional status of a human (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115(4), 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hostetter, A. B., Russell, J. L., Freeman, H., & Hopkins, W. D. (2007). Now you see me, now you don’t: Evidence that chimpanzees understand the role of the eyes in attention. Animal Cognition, 10(1), 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaminski, J. (2015). Theory of mind: A primatological perspective. In W. Henke & I. Tattersall (Eds.), Handbook of paleoanthropology (pp. 1741–1757). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Body orientation and face orientation: Two factors controlling apes’ begging behavior from humans. Animal Cognition, 7(4), 216–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kobayashi, H., & Kohshima, S. (2001). Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: Comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye. Journal of Human Evolution, 40(5), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krupenye, C., Kano, F., Hirata, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science, 354(6308), 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leavens, D. A., Hostetter, A. B., Wesley, M. J., & Hopkins, W. D. (2004). Tactical use of unimodal and bimodal communication by chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Animal Behaviour, 67(3), 467–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (2017). The mismeasure of ape social cognition. Animal Cognition, 1–18.Google Scholar
  25. Liebal, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2004a). Use of gesture sequences in chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology, 64(4), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liebal, K., Call, J., Tomasello, M., & Pika, S. (2004b). To move or not to move: How apes adjust to the attentional state of others. Interaction Studies, 5(2), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liebal, K., Pika, S., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Gestural communication of orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Gesture, 6(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liebal, K., Waller, B. M., Slocombe, K. E., & Burrows, A. M. (2014). Primate communication: A multimodal approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Melis, A. P., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) conceal visual and auditory information from others. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120(2), 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Okamoto-Barth, S., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Great apes’ understanding of other individuals’ line of sight. Psychological Science, 18(5), 462–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Poss, S. R., Kuhar, C., Stoinski, T. S., & Hopkins, W. D. (2006). Differential use of attentional and visual communicative signaling by orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in response to the attentional status of a human. American Journal of Primatology, 68(10), 978–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Povinelli, D. J., Eddy, T. J., Hobson, R. P., & Tomasello, M. (1996). What young chimpanzees know about seeing. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, i–189.Google Scholar
  33. Santos, L. R., Nissen, A. G., & Ferrugia, J. A. (2006). Rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta, know what others can and cannot hear. Animal Behaviour, 71(5), 1175–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Team, R. C. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  35. Tempelmann, S., & Liebal, K. (2012). Spontaneous use of gesture sequences in orangutans. Developments in Primate Gesture Research, 6, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tempelmann, S., Kaminski, J., & Liebal, K. (2011). Focus on the essential: All great apes know when others are being attentive. Animal Cognition, 14(3), 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Theall, L. A., & Povinelli, D. J. (1999). Do chimpanzees tailor their gestural signals to fit the attentional states of others?. Animal Cognition, 2(4), 207–214.Google Scholar
  38. Tomasello, M., Hare, B., Lehmann, H., & Call, J. (2007). Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: The cooperative eye hypothesis. Journal of Human Evolution, 52(3), 314–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Animal Care SciencesSmithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology InstituteWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Inkwau Vervet Project, Mawana Game ReserveSwart MfoloziSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations