Advertisement

International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 415–426 | Cite as

Consequences of Lemur Loss for Above-Ground Carbon Stocks in a Malagasy Rainforest

  • Onja H. Razafindratsima
  • Anecia Gentles
  • Andrea P. Drager
  • Jean-Claude A. Razafimahaimodison
  • Claude J. Ralazampirenena
  • Amy E. Dunham
Article

Abstract

Anthropogenic disturbances have resulted in declines of seed-dispersing primate frugivores in tropical forests. Previous work has suggested that loss of seed dispersal by large frugivores may have a negative impact on ecosystem carbon storage by reducing tree biomass. However, we know little about the potential impacts of losing frugivores in Madagascar’s diverse rainforest ecosystem. Understanding the effects of frugivore extinction on carbon loss is relevant in Madagascar, where threatened lemur taxa are the only dispersers of many large-seeded plant species. Using a dataset of tree species composition and traits from the southeastern rainforests of Ranomafana National Park, we examined whether seed size and lemur-dependent dispersal are positively associated with above-ground tree biomass. We then simulated different scenarios of population declines of large-seeded trees (>10 mm seed length) dependent on lemur-mediated seed dispersal, to examine potential directional changes in carbon storage capacity of Malagasy forests under lemur loss. Lemur-dispersed tree species, which have large seeds, had higher above-ground biomass than other species. Our simulations showed that the loss of large frugivorous primates in Madagascar may decrease the forest’s potential to store carbon. These results demonstrate the importance of primate conservation for maintaining functioning ecosystems and forest carbon stocks in one of the world’s hottest hotspots of biodiversity.

Keywords

Above-ground biomass Conservation Extinction Primate Seed dispersal Tropical forest 

Introduction

Anthropogenic disturbances have resulted in significant declines and/or loss of vertebrate species worldwide (Dirzo et al. 2014; Johnson et al. 2017; Malhi et al. 2016). In addition to the direct impact of species loss on biodiversity, there is increasing concern that this pattern of biodiversity loss may also result in negative, cascading impacts at the ecosystem level (Dirzo et al. 2014; Galetti and Dirzo 2013). Because vertebrates perform important ecological roles, understanding functional consequences of vertebrate declines is important for understanding long-term impacts of environmental change. A pervasive pattern in the tropics has been the loss of large-bodied frugivores, including primates, which are important seed dispersers for many large-seeded plant species. Loss of large frugivores could favor fast-growing pioneer trees, which tend to rely on wind or small birds for dispersal (Foster and Janson 1985), and that hold less biomass than larger, mature-forest species. Loss of vertebrates could thus reduce a forest’s potential for above-ground carbon storage, by altering the trait composition of plant communities. While recent studies in the Neotropics and Africa have suggested that vertebrate loss is likely to reduce above-ground biomass through changes in plant communities, generalizations may not hold across tropical regions (Bello et al. 2015; Osuri et al. 2016; Peres et al. 2016). Impacts of vertebrate declines on above-ground carbon storage are not evident in Asia, for example, where there is an abundance and diversity of large, wind-dispersed tree species (Harrison et al. 2013; Osuri et al. 2016).

In Madagascar’s tropical ecosystems, frugivorous lemurs constitute a large portion of the frugivore biomass and are the primary seed dispersal agents for many large-seeded plant species (see review in Razafindratsima 2014). With a majority of lemur species threatened with extinction (Schwitzer et al. 2014), there are increasing concerns about the negative consequences of lemur loss on forest composition, regeneration, and dynamics (Federman et al. 2016; Ganzhorn et al. 1999; Razafindratsima and Dunham 2015). For instance, a recent study reports a fourfold lower recruitment probability for a population of an abundant, long-lived canopy tree species in the absence of lemur frugivores (Razafindratsima and Dunham 2015). However, we know relatively little about the potential impacts of losing lemurs at the ecosystem level, including whether their loss might affect carbon storage in Malagasy forests.

Madagascar’s tropical forests represent an important reservoir of terrestrial carbon. For instance, a recent study in Madagascar’s northern humid forests estimates a mean above-ground carbon density of 99.5 metric ton (Mg) C/ha with estimates ranging as high as 257.4 Mg C/ha (Asner et al. 2012). Unfortunately, the potential of Malagasy forests to store carbon is threatened by not only incessant deforestation, fragmentation, and logging (Allnutt et al. 2013; Ganzhorn et al. 2001; Harper et al. 2007), but also by the potential disruptions of frugivore-mediated seed dispersal. The potential impact of losing Madagascar’s largest frugivores on above-ground carbon storage is unknown but understanding potential patterns is important for maintaining ecosystem services and the long-term conservation of these unique ecosystems.

Loss of seed dispersal service from Madagascar’s biodiverse forests may be especially critical because Madagascar is already poor in terms of frugivore richness (Fleming et al. 1987), which is highly threatened by increasing anthropogenic pressures (Dewar and Richard 2012; Ganzhorn et al. 2001). Large-bodied lemurs may play a disproportionate role as seed dispersal agents in Madagascar because 1) many Malagasy tree species have traits adapted for seed dispersal by frugivores, and 2) large-bodied lemurs (>1 kg) are often the only seed dispersers for tree species with the largest seeds (Bollen et al. 2004; Martinez and Razafindratsima 2014; Razafindratsima 2014; Razafindratsima and Martinez 2012; Razafindratsima and Razafimahatratra 2010). Unfortunately, ca. 94% of lemur species (N = 101) are currently under high risk of extinction (Schwitzer et al. 2014), from fragmentation, hunting, and climate change (Barrett and Ratsimbazafy 2009; Borgerson et al. 2016; Dunham et al. 2008, 2011; Ratsimbazafy et al. 2012; Schwitzer et al. 2014), with the larger species at greater risk (Fritz et al. 2009).

Here, we examine the potential impacts of losing Madagascar’s threatened large-bodied frugivores (diurnal lemurs) on above-ground biomass in a diverse rainforest ecosystem. The impacts of losing large frugivores are expected to be greatest in systems that are structured by compatibility in size between plants and animals (“size matching”; Donoso et al. 2017). Thus, we first examined whether plant traits, including seed size and lemur-dependent dispersal, were positively associated with above-ground tree biomass. Then, we examined potential directional changes in carbon storage capacity of Malagasy forests under lemur loss by simulating different scenarios of population declines of large-seeded lemur-dispersed trees. Our dataset includes trait measurements of 7233 individuals of 275 tree species and the species composition of eight 1-ha plots scattered throughout the rainforest of Ranomafana National Park, in southeastern Madagascar. Our simulations estimate forest compositional change after lemur loss and were run under different scenarios in which lemur-dispersed tree individuals were removed at an increasing percentage and replaced by randomly drawing individual trees from the remaining pool.

Methods

Study Site

Ranomafana National Park (RNP), located in southeastern Madagascar (47°18′–47°37′E, 21°02′– 21°25′S), comprises an area of 41,600 ha of evergreen rainforest and is home to more than 330 species of trees and large shrubs (Razafindratsima and Dunham 2015). The assemblage of known seed dispersers of the diverse plant species in RNP (Dew and Wright 1998; Rakotomanana et al. 2003; Razafindratsima 2014; Razafindratsima and Dunham 2015; Razafindratsima et al. 2014) consists of three large-bodied diurnal lemur species (mean body mass ca. 2.00–3.50 kg; one classified as Critically Endangered and two Vulnerable), two small-bodied lemur species (mean body mass ca. 0.04–0.5 kg on average; one classified as Vulnerable and one as Data Deficient), three bat species (mean body mass ca. 0.05-0.36 kg on average; two classified as Vulnerable and one as Near Threatened) and six bird species (mean body mass ca. 0.01–0.20 kg on average, all classified as Least Concern) (body mass measurements: Razafindratsima et al. 2018b, c; threat status: IUCN 2017). The interior forests of RNP are estimated to have a mean above-ground biomass of 243 Mg/ha (Razafindratsima et al. 2018a).

The dataset on the tree community used in this study was from surveys within eight 1-ha plots scattered throughout RNP (cf. map in Electronic Supplementary Material [ESM] Fig. S1). We obtained data on six plots through the online database of the Tropical Ecology Assessment and Monitoring Network (http://www.teamnetwork.org/, dataset identifier: TEAM-DataPackage-20170908090439_2451). We considered only the latest survey, conducted in 2016–2017, from this multiple-year monitoring dataset and removed any dead individuals. With the help of local research technicians trained in florisitic identification, O. H. Razafindratsima conducted vegetation surveys in two additional 1-ha plots in 2015–2016. In each plot, all trees of >10 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) in each plot were identified. For accuracy and consistency in nomenclature, we checked and standardized all species names and families in accordance with the currently accepted taxonomies in the Taxonomic Name Resolution Service v4.0 (http://tnrs.iplantcollaborative.org/). We excluded nonwoody vegetation (such as tree ferns), lianas, and unknown tree species. In total, our dataset comprised 7233 individuals of 275 tree species, 127 genera, and 57 families in all 8 plots.

Plant Traits

We compiled data on seed dispersal mode, seed length, and wood density for each tree species in our vegetation plots. Following previous studies of seed dispersal in this system, we categorized species as primarily dispersed by birds, lemurs, or both groups of frugivores (“mixed” dispersal mode), and dispersed by abiotic means (such as by explosion and wind) (Razafindratsima et al. 2018a). We gathered data on seed dispersal mode of each species from our own observations of frugivory interactions, from the long-term knowledge of the local fauna and flora by local field technicians in RNP, and from the literature (Dew and Wright 1998; Overdorff 1993; Rakotomanana et al. 2003; Razafindratsima and Dunham 2016; Razafindratsima et al. 2014, 2017, 2018a; White et al. 1995). We selected length to represent seed size, although seed diameter may also be a limiting trait for seed ingestion in some frugivores (Galetti et al. 2013; Levey 1987), because seed length and diameter are strongly correlated in our system such that species long seeds are also wide (ESM Fig. S2), and to ensure more robust comparison with other studies, which use this metric as their seed size index (Osuri et al. 2016). We obtained data on seed length (measurement along the longest axis of the seed) through our own measurements in the field and in herbaria, and from literature (Dew and Wright 1998; Overdorff and Strait 1998; Razafindratsima et al. 2017, 2018a). We assigned mean genus-length level for species without known seed length (this included genera that are not in this study’s dataset but occur in RNP), given that seed length at the species and genus levels are often positively correlated (Osuri et al. 2016). We obtained data on wood density (g/cm3) from the literature (Razafindratsima et al. 2017, 2018a), from the Global Wood Density Database (Chave et al. 2009; Zanne et al. 2009), and from our own field measurements of oven-dried wood mass over green volume of tree cores, following the procedures in these published measurements. For species with unavailable wood density values, we assigned the mean genus and family levels following previous studies (Bello et al. 2015; Lewis et al. 2009; Osuri et al. 2016; Slik et al. 2013). Genus-level means of wood density provide useful approximation values for the species values because wood density has been found to be conservative at the genus level (Chave et al. 2006). We used these estimates of trait values at the genus and family levels only in the simulations, but not for assessing allometric relationships. ESM Fig. S3 presents the distributions of trait data across the different dispersal modes.

Relationship Between Seed Size and Biomass-Related Traits

We examined the relationships between each biomass-related traits (DBH and wood density) and seed length, by performing Generalized Linear Models in R v. 3.4.1 (R Core Team, Vienna), using the “Gaussian” family. Only the variable wood density was normally distributed, even when we log-transformed the data. The performances of the GLMs are presented in ESM Fig. S4.

Carbon Storage Estimations

We estimated carbon stored by each individual trees as follow: Carbon = 0.5 ∗ biomass (Osuri et al. 2016). Biomass refers to the above-ground biomass of each tree, estimated using the following equation developed by Chave et al. (2005) for moist forests:
$$ Biomass=W\ast {e}^{-1.499+2.148\ast \log (D)+0.207\ast \log {(D)}^2-0.0281\ast \log {(D)}^3} $$
W corresponds to wood density in g/cm3 and D is DBH in cm. We selected this equation because 1) it was developed from a large pan-tropical dataset of tree measurements; 2) it has been used in a global study of the impacts of defaunation on carbon storage, allowing more accurate comparison of our system with their findings (Osuri et al. 2016); and 3) a recent study of the potential for carbon storage of RNP forests reports positive associations between the four metrics of above-ground biomass developed by Chave et al. (2005) for moist and wet forest (Razafindratsima et al. 2018a). Given that we are not making intersite comparisons of above-ground biomass and carbon storage, we think that our choice of equation does not bias our results.

Simulations

We combined the eight plots into one large community; our dataset for simulation of carbon changes included only species with data on all four traits (seed length, dispersal mode, DBH, and wood density), for a total of 4226 individuals. To simulate changes in the tree community, we ran two hypothetical scenarios: 1) Directed, in which large-seeded (>10 mm length) tree species that are primarily dispersed by lemurs were removed and then replaced, and 2) Random, in which tree removal was independent of seed size and dispersal mode. In the directed scenario, species with mixed dispersal mode (i.e., dispersed by both birds and lemurs) were not treated as primarily lemur-dispersed because birds may be able to compensate for the loss of lemur frugivores and disperse the seeds of these species. As a conservative measure, we used a cutoff of 10 mm seed size for our trees already characterized as primarily lemur-dispersed because these larger seeds are less likely to have compensatory dispersal by other frugivores in the system. In each scenario, we removed/replaced an increasing percentage of individual trees (25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) and ran the simulations 1000 times for each percentage category. Each simulation had two steps: 1) Removal of individual trees from the community, and 2) Random draw of individual trees from the remaining community to replace the lost individuals and construct a new final community. The number of individuals removed in Directed and Random scenarios was the same. We calculated the community-level carbon storage by summing up the carbon stored in each individual tree in the initial community and in each final simulated community. Carbon change is reported as the percentage of change (increase or decrease) from the initial carbon to the final carbon. For each simulation run, we also calculated community-stand wood density and volume (which is the second part of the foregoing biomass equation). We examined whether the estimated carbon changes under the Directed scenario were related to overall changes in community-level volume and/or wood densities by performing Pearson correlation tests. Simulations and calculations were run using basic functions implemented in R.

Data Availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical Note

Data collection efforts adhered to the legal requirements of Madagascar (Wilmé et al. 2016), where the research was conducted. This research did not involve animal handling. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Results

Based on our trait data, up to 87% of the tree species in RNP have traits adapted for seed dispersal by frugivores, 66% of which are primarily dispersed by lemurs. We found functional relationships between seed length and traits related to carbon storage overall (Fig. 1), such that large-seeded trees had high above-ground biomass. Seed length was positively associated with wood density (t = 2.93, P = 0.004, N = 100) and tree diameter (t = 3.48, P < 0.001, N = 108).
Fig. 1

Relationships between seed length and carbon-related traits (a: wood density, b: tree diameter) for tree species with different dispersal modes in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. Each point represents a tree species. The solid line shows the linear regression fit for the trend and the confidence interval (gray envelopes), from GLM tests. R2 for each model was obtained using the package rsq in R.

Our simulations showed that loss of individuals of large-seeded tree species dispersed by lemurs was associated with a decrease in carbon storage (Fig. 2a). Carbon losses for 50% removal of large-seeded lemur dispersed trees was about 5% while the carbon loss for 100% removal was about 9%. However, under a random scenario, where local losses of trees are independent of seed size and seed dispersal mode, the forest’s capacity for carbon storage remained unchanged, regardless of the percentage of individuals removed (Fig. 2b). These changes in carbon storage, following the removal of large-sized lemur-dispersed trees, were strongly correlated with overall simulated changes in volumes (Pearson, R = 0.99, df = 3998, P < 0.0001) and wood density (Pearson, R = 0.64, df = 3998, P < 0.0001); although the community-level changes in wood density was very small (< 2%, ESM Fig. S5).
Fig. 2

Model estimates of carbon change under different simulation scenarios of local changes in tree communities in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar (with different categories of removal). a Directed scenario corresponds to removal of individuals of large-seeded tree species primarily dispersed by lemurs. b Random scenario corresponds to removal of trees independent of seed size and dispersal mode. Species with >10 mm long seeds were considered large seeded. Values shown are mean percentage of change from carbon initial to final (after simulation) across 1000 iterations, and standard errors. Positive values indicate gain in carbon storage while negative values represent loss.

Discussion

Large frugivorous vertebrates, including primates, are experiencing high rates of population decline across the tropics as a result of human activities (Dirzo et al. 2014; Fritz et al. 2009; Malhi et al. 2016). In systems in which large dense trees tend to rely on large frugivores to disperse their seeds, frugivore loss could have negative consequences for above-ground carbon storage (Bello et al. 2015; Galetti and Dirzo 2013; Kurten 2013; Nuñez-Iturri and Howe 2007; Terborgh et al. 2008). Our data and simulations from Madagascar’s southeastern rainforest suggests that if lemur extinctions result in population declines of trees that specialize on lemurs for dispersal, reduction of above-ground tree biomass is a likely outcome. The simulated replacement of large-seeded, lemur-dispersed tree species decreased estimated above-ground biomass by an average of about 5% under the 50% directed scenario (half of the individuals of large-seeded lemur-dispersed trees lost from communities and replaced with individuals of other species), and by an average of about 9% under the 100% replacement scenario. These results are similar in scale to studies simulating removal and replacement of large-seeded trees in other tropical forests, where a large majority of trees are dispersed by vertebrates (Osuri et al. 2016). These results highlight the potential for lost ecosystem services as Madagascar’s larger-bodied (>1 kg) lemur populations continue to edge towards extinction. Our results support the suggestion that maintaining populations of large frugivores should be included as part of the agenda for conservation programs aimed at reducing emissions and maintaining long-term carbon stocks in tropical forests, such as the REDD+ program (Peres et al. 2016).

To assess potential impacts of losing large frugivores on above-ground carbon storage, we applied models used in previous studies of Africa, Asia, and the Neotropics to allow a comparison with Madagascar (Bello et al. 2015; Osuri et al. 2016). Our results suggest consequences of large frugivore loss similar to that found for Neotropical, African, and Indian rainforests, where endozoochory is also the main mode of seed dispersal, but not in Malaysia, Australia, or Indonesia, where seed dispersal by wind is common among large tree species (Bello et al. 2015; Osuri et al. 2016; Peres et al. 2016). Across the tropics, it appears that downsizing in ecological networks (i.e., when larger species are lost) is likely to have the greatest impacts when interactions are structured by size matching (Donoso et al. 2017), such as when large trees are dependent on large frugivores for dispersal and recruitment. In Madagascar, understanding the impacts of defaunation is especially important given the high levels of extinction risk facing large-bodied lemurs on the island (Schwitzer et al. 2014).

Our current study and previous work using such simulations rely on the assumption that disperser loss will negatively impact tree fitness. In Madagascar, frugivorous lemurs have been shown to positively influence 3-year sapling recruitment (Razafindratsima and Dunham 2015). However, because of the difficulty in studying population dynamics of long-lived organisms such as trees, empirical data are limited on impacts of frugivores on adult tree populations. Our simulations may overestimate impacts of frugivore loss on above-ground biomass if later stages of tree recruitment ultimately drive population sizes of adult trees. We also know little about how other organisms may compensate for the loss of large lemurs in this system. Because of this uncertainty, we feel it is inappropriate to make specific quantitative predictions of carbon loss after lemur extinction. Regardless, our results suggest that the decline of lemur-dispersed trees could reduce the forest’s ability to store above-ground carbon.

Loss of seed dispersal services by the lemur frugivores could have important effects on plant community composition if loss of dispersal services impacts demographic rates. While several studies have suggested negative demographic and genetic effects of losing large frugivores on large-seeded tree species (Carvalho et al. 2016; Laughlin 2014; Razafindratsima and Dunham 2015; Wotton and Kelly 2011), some studies have suggested that plants with lower partner diversity may depend less on mutualistic interactions (Fricke et al. 2017). In addition, the loss of large seed dispersers may be compensated through secondary seed dispersal (Culot et al. 2017; Jansen et al. 2012). In Madagascar, large-seeded tree species have specialized mutualisms with large frugivorous primates; but some authors have suggested that secondary dispersal of these tree species could be performed by ground-dwelling rodents (Dausmann et al. 2008; Ganzhorn et al. 1999; Goodman and Sterling 1996; Razafindratsima 2014). However, even though native rodents have been observed to remove seeds on the ground in Malagasy systems (Dausmann et al. 2008; Goodman and Sterling 1996), there are no known scatter-hoarding rodents and currently no evidence of secondary dispersal by larder-hoarding rodents (Razafindratsima 2017). To resolve this, more studies are needed to understand the importance of seed dispersal for the recruitment of large-seeded plants across systems.

In recent decades, a looming threat to Madagascar’s biodiverse tropical forests has become apparent as Malagasy flora face increased threat of losing critical seed dispersers (Razafindratsima 2014). Lemurs play important ecological role in plant communities as seed dispersers because many Malagasy plant species are dispersed by lemurs (Birkinshaw 1999; Bollen et al. 2004, 2005; Razafindratsima 2014). Unfortunately, large-bodied lemurs are facing especially high risk of extinction through the combined effects of hunting, habitat destruction and even climate change (Barrett and Ratsimbazafy 2009; Borgerson et al. 2016; Dewar and Richard 2012; Dunham et al. 2008, 2011; Schwitzer et al. 2014). Our findings highlight the fragility of Malagasy tropical forests and the urgent need to develop more efficient ways to protect Malagasy primates for maintaining forest integrity and ecosystem services in one of the world’s hottest hotspots of biodiversity.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank numerous field research technicians for their valuable help in data collection and species identification. Part of the data used in this publication were provided by the Tropical Ecology Assessment and Monitoring (TEAM) Network, a collaboration between Conservation International, the Missouri Botanical Garden, the Smithsonian Institution, and the Wildlife Conservation Society, and partially funded by these institutions, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and other donors. We also thank Yamato Tsuji and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments that improved an earlier version of this manuscript.

Supplementary material

10764_2018_42_MOESM1_ESM.docx (448 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 448 kb)
10764_2018_42_MOESM2_ESM.docx (82 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 81 kb)
10764_2018_42_MOESM3_ESM.docx (189 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 188 kb)
10764_2018_42_MOESM4_ESM.docx (591 kb)
ESM 4 (DOCX 591 kb)
10764_2018_42_MOESM5_ESM.docx (134 kb)
ESM 5 (DOCX 134 kb)

References

  1. Allnutt, T. F., Asner, G. P., Golden, C. D., & Powell, G. V. (2013). Mapping recent deforestation and forest disturbance in northeastern Madagascar. Tropical Conservation Science, 6(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asner, G. P., Clark, J. K., Mascaro, J., Vaudry, R., Chadwick, K. D., et al (2012). Human and environmental controls over aboveground carbon storage in Madagascar. Carbon Balance and Management, 7, 2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett, M. A., & Ratsimbazafy, J. (2009). Luxury bushmeat trade threatens lemur conservation. Nature, 461(7263), 470–470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bello, C., Galetti, M., Pizo, M. A., Magnago, L. F. S., Rocha, M. F., et al (2015). Defaunation affects carbon storage in tropical forests. Science Advances, 1(11), e1501105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkinshaw, C. R. (1999). The importance of the black lemur (Eulemur macaco) for seed dispersal in Lokobe Forest, Nosy be. In B. Rakotosamimanana, H. Rasamimanana, J. U. Ganzhorn, & S. M. Goodman (Eds.), New directions in lemur studies (pp. 189–199). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bollen, A., Elsacker, L. V., & Ganzhorn, J. U. (2004). Relations between fruits and disperser assemblages in a Malagasy littoral forest: A community-level approach. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 20(6), 599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollen, A., Donati, G., Fietz, J., Schwab, D., Ramanamanjato, J.-B., et al (2005). An intersite comparison of fruit characteristics in Madagascar: Evidence for selection pressure through abiotic constraints rather than through co-evolution. In J. L. Dew & J. P. Boubli (Eds.), Tropical fruits and frugivores (pp. 93–119). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borgerson, C., McKean, M. A., Sutherland, M. R., & Godfrey, L. R. (2016). Who hunts lemurs and why they hunt them. Biological Conservation, 197, 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carvalho, C. S., Galetti, M., Colevatti, R. G., & Jordano, P. (2016). Defaunation leads to microevolutionary changes in a tropical palm. Scientific Reports, 6, 31957.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M. A., Chambers, J. Q., et al (2005). Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145(1), 87–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chave, J., Muller-Landau, H. C., Baker, T. R., Easdale, T. A., ter Steege, H., & Webb, C. O. (2006). Regional and phylogenetic variation of wood density across 2456 Neotropical tree species. Ecological Applications, 16(6), 2356–2367.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chave, J., Coomes, D., Jansen, S., Lewis, S. L., Swenson, N. G., & Zanne, A. E. (2009). Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecology Letters, 12(4), 351–366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Culot, L., Bello, C., Batista, J. L. F., Couto, H. T. Z., & Galetti, M. (2017). Synergistic effects of seed disperser and predator loss on recruitment success and long-term consequences for carbon stocks in tropical rainforests. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 7662.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Dausmann, K. H., Glos, J., Linsenmair, K. E., & Ganzhorn, J. U. (2008). Improved recruitment of a lemur-dispersed tree in Malagasy dry forests after the demise of vertebrates in forest fragments. Oecologia, 157(2), 307–316.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dew, J. L., & Wright, P. (1998). Frugivory and seed dispersal by four species of primates in Madagascar’s eastern rain forest. Biotropica, 30(3), 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dewar, R. E., & Richard, A. F. (2012). Madagascar: A history of arrivals, what happened, and will happen next. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Galetti, M., Ceballos, G., Isaac, N. J., & Collen, B. (2014). Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science, 345(6195), 401–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Donoso, I., Schleuning, M., García, D., & Fründ, J. (2017). Defaunation effects on plant recruitment depend on size matching and size trade-offs in seed-dispersal networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20162664.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunham, A. E., Erhart, E. M., Overdorff, D. J., & Wright, P. C. (2008). Evaluating effects of deforestation, hunting, and El Nino events on a threatened lemur. Biological Conservation, 141(1), 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunham, A. E., Erhart, E. M., & Wright, P. C. (2011). Global climate cycles and cyclones: Consequences for rainfall patterns and lemur reproduction in southeastern Madagascar. Global Change Biology, 17(1), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Federman, S., Dornburg, A., Daly, D. C., Downie, A., Perry, G. H., et al (2016). Implications of lemuriform extinctions for the Malagasy flora. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 113(18), 5041–5046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fleming, T. H., Breitwisch, R., & Whitesides, G. H. (1987). Patterns of tropical vertebrate frugivore diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foster, S., & Janson, C. H. (1985). The relationship between seed size and establishment conditions in tropical woody plants. Ecology, 66(3), 773–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fricke, E. C., Tewksbury, J. J., Wandrag, E. M., & Rogers, H. S. (2017). Mutualistic strategies minimize coextinction in plant–disperser networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1854), 20162302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Fritz, S. A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., & Purvis, A. (2009). Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk: Big is bad, but only in the tropics. Ecology Letters, 12(6), 538–549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Galetti, M., & Dirzo, R. (2013). Ecological and evolutionary consequences of living in a defaunated world. Biological Conservation, 163, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galetti, M., Guevara, R., Côrtes, M. C., Fadini, R., Von Matter, S., et al (2013). Functional extinction of birds drives rapid evolutionary changes in seed size. Science, 340(6136), 1086–1090.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ganzhorn, J. U., Fietz, J., Rakotovao, E., Schwab, D., & Zinner, D. (1999). Lemurs and the regeneration of dry deciduous forest in Madagascar. Conservation Biology, 13(4), 794–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ganzhorn, J. U., Lowry, P. P., Schatz, G. E., & Sommer, S. (2001). The biodiversity of Madagascar: One of the world’s hottest hotspots on its way out. Oryx, 35(4), 346–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goodman, S. M., & Sterling, E. J. (1996). The utilisation of Canarium (Burseraceae) seeds by vertebrates in the Reserve Naturelle Integrale d’Andringitra, Madagascar. Fieldiana Zoology, 85, 83–89.Google Scholar
  31. Harper, G. J., Steininger, M. K., Tucker, C. J., Juhn, D., & Hawkins, F. (2007). Fifty years of deforestation and forest fragmentation in Madagascar. Environmental Conservation, 34(4), 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison, R. D., Tan, S., Plotkin, J. B., Slik, F., Detto, M., et al (2013). Consequences of defaunation for a tropical tree community. Ecology Letters, 16(5), 687–694.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. IUCN (2017) IUCN Red List of threatened species, IUCN, the World Conservation Union. http://www.iucnredlist.org/
  34. Jansen, P. A., Hirsch, B. T., Emsens, W.-J., Zamora-Gutierrez, V., Wikelski, M., & Kays, R. (2012). Thieving rodents as substitute dispersers of megafaunal seeds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 109(31), 12610–12615.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, C. N., Balmford, A., Brook, B. W., Buettel, J. C., Galetti, M., et al (2017). Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science, 356(6335), 270–275.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kurten, E. L. (2013). Cascading effects of contemporaneous defaunation on tropical forest communities. Biological Conservation, 163, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Laughlin, D. C. (2014). The intrinsic dimensionality of plant traits and its relevance to community assembly. Journal of Ecology, 102, 186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levey, D. J. (1987). Seed size and fruit-handling techniques of avian frugivores. The American Naturalist, 129(4), 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewis, S. L., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Sonké, B., Affum-Baffoe, K., Baker, T. R., et al (2009). Increasing carbon storage in intact African tropical forests. Nature, 457(7232), 1003–1006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Malhi, Y., Doughty, C. E., Galetti, M., Smith, F. A., Svenning, J.-C., & Terborgh, J. W. (2016). Megafauna and ecosystem function from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 113(4), 838–846.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Martinez, B. T., & Razafindratsima, O. H. (2014). Frugivory and seed dispersal patterns of the red-ruffed lemur, Varecia rubra, at a forest restoration site in Masoala National Park, Madagascar. Folia Primatologica, 85(4), 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nuñez-Iturri, G., & Howe, H. F. (2007). Bushmeat and the fate of trees with seeds dispersed by large primates in a lowland rain forest in western Amazonia. Biotropica, 39(3), 348–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Osuri, A. M., Ratnam, J., Varma, V., Alvarez-Loayza, P., Hurtado Astaiza, J., et al (2016). Contrasting effects of defaunation on aboveground carbon storage across the global tropics. Nature Communications, 7, 11351.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Overdorff, D. J. (1993). Similarities, differences, and seasonal patterns in the diets of Eulemur rubriventer and Eulemur fulvus rufus in the Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology, 14(5), 721–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Overdorff, D. J., & Strait, S. G. (1998). Seed handling by three prosimian primates in southeastern Madagascar: Implications for seed dispersal. American Journal of Primatology, 45(1), 69–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Peres, C. A., Emilio, T., Schietti, J., Desmoulière, S. J. M., & Levi, T. (2016). Dispersal limitation induces long-term biomass collapse in overhunted Amazonian forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 113(4), 892–897.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rakotomanana, H., Hino, T., Kanzaki, M., & Morioka, H. (2003). The role of the velvet asity Philepitta castanea in regeneration of understory shrubs in Madagascan rainforest. Ornithological Science, 2(1), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ratsimbazafy, J. H., Arrigo-Nelson, S. J., Dollar, L., Holmes, C. M., Irwin, M. T., et al (2012). Conservation of Malagasy prosimians: A view from the Great Red Island. In J. Masters, M. Gamba, & F. Génin (Eds.), Leaping ahead: Advances in Prosimian Biology (pp. 387–396). New York: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
  49. Razafindratsima, O. H. (2014). Seed dispersal by vertebrates in Madagascar’s forests: Review and future directions. Madagascar Conservation and Development, 9, 90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Razafindratsima, O. H. (2017). Post-dispersal seed removal by rodents in Ranomafana rain forest, Madagascar. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 33, 232–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Razafindratsima, O. H., & Dunham, A. E. (2015). Assessing the impacts of nonrandom seed dispersal by multiple frugivore partners on plant recruitment. Ecology, 96(1), 24–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Razafindratsima, O. H., & Dunham, A. E. (2016). Frugivores bias seed-adult tree associations through non-random seed dispersal: A phylogenetic approach. Ecology, 97(8), 2094–2102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Razafindratsima, O. H., & Martinez, B. T. (2012). Seed dispersal by red-ruffed lemurs: Seed size, viability, and beneficial effect on seedling growth. Ecotropica, 18, 15–26.Google Scholar
  54. Razafindratsima, O. H., & Razafimahatratra, E. (2010). Effect of red ruffed lemur gut passage on the germination of native rainforest plant species. Lemur News, 15, 39–42.Google Scholar
  55. Razafindratsima, O. H., Jones, T. A., & Dunham, A. E. (2014). Patterns of movement and seed dispersal by three lemur species. American Journal of Primatology, 76(1), 84–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Razafindratsima, O. H., Brown, K. A., Carvalho, F., Johnson, S. E., Wright, P. C., & Dunham, A. E. (2017). Data from: Edge effects on components of diversity and above-ground biomass in a tropical rainforest. Dryad Data Repository.  https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.jn743.
  57. Razafindratsima, O. H., Brown, K. A., Carvalho, F., Johnson, S. E., Wright, P. C., & Dunham, A. E. (2018a). Edge effects on components of diversity and above-ground biomass in a tropical rainforest. Journal of Applied Ecology, 55(2), 977–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Razafindratsima, O. H., Yacoby, Y., & Park, D. S. (2018b). MADA: Malagasy Animal Trait Data Archive. Ecology, 99, 990.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Razafindratsima, O. H., Yacoby, Y., & Park, D. S. (2018c). Data from: MADA: Malagasy Animal Trait Data Archive. Dryad Data Repository.  https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.44tt0
  60. Schwitzer, C., Mittermeier, R. A., Johnson, S. E., Donati, G., Irwin, M., Peacock, H., et al (2014). Averting lemur extinctions amid Madagascar’s political crisis. Science, 343(6173), 842–843.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Slik, J. W., Paoli, G., McGuire, K., Amaral, I., Barroso, J., et al (2013). Large trees drive forest aboveground biomass variation in moist lowland forests across the tropics. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22(12), 1261–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Terborgh, J. W., Nuñez-Iturri, G., Pitman, N. C. A., Valverde, F. H. C., Alvarez, P., et al (2008). Tree recruitment in an empty forest. Ecology, 89(6), 1757–1768.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. White, F. J., Overdorff, D. J., Balko, E. A., & Wright, P. C. (1995). Distribution of ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata) in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. Folia Primatologica, 64(3), 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilmé, L., Waeber, P. O., Moutou, F., Gardner, C. J., Razafindratsima, O. H., et al (2016). A proposal for ethical research conduct in Madagascar. Madagascar Conservation & Development, 11(1).  https://doi.org/10.4314/mcd.v11i1.8.
  65. Wotton, D. M., & Kelly, D. (2011). Frugivore loss limits recruitment of large-seeded trees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1723), 3345–3354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Zanne, A. E., Lopez-Gonzalez, G., Coomes, D. A., Ilic, J., Jansen, S., et al (2009). Data from: Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Dryad Digital Repository.  https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.234.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Onja H. Razafindratsima
    • 1
  • Anecia Gentles
    • 2
  • Andrea P. Drager
    • 2
  • Jean-Claude A. Razafimahaimodison
    • 3
  • Claude J. Ralazampirenena
    • 3
  • Amy E. Dunham
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiologyCollege of CharlestonCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.Department of BioSciencesRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Centre ValBioRanomafanaMadagascar

Personalised recommendations