International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp 425–444

Assessing the Occurrence of Sexual Segregation in Spider Monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi yucatanensis), Its Mechanisms and Function

  • Kayla S. Hartwell
  • Hugh Notman
  • Christophe Bonenfant
  • Mary S. M. Pavelka
Article

Abstract

Sexual segregation is a recognized dimension of the socioecology of many vertebrates, but it has not been systematically examined in primates. We investigated temporal patterns of sexual segregation in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi yucatanensis) using a test that distinguishes sexual segregation from aggregation and random association between the sexes. We further investigated how sexual segregation varies over time as a function of food availability, and then tested other possible factors that might be causally linked to sexual segregation in spider monkeys. We predicted that male philopatry and cooperative territorial defence leads to sexual dimorphism in behavior, which in turn creates different optimal energetic requirements for males and females as reflected in differing activity budgets and diet. We investigated sexual segregation in a group of 33–35 spider monkeys at Runaway Creek Nature Reserve in Belize over 23 mo in 2008–2009. We used the sex compositions of subgroups recorded in scan samples to test the occurrence of sexual segregation at monthly and biweekly time scales.We found that males and females were significantly segregated in 15 out of the 23 mo of the study, and that periods of nonsegregation coincided with months of low food availability. The sexes differed significantly in activity and diet; males spent more time traveling, and less time resting and feeding than females, and they had a higher proportion of ripe fruits in their diets than did females. We propose that sexual segregation in spider monkeys is primarily a form of social segregation that results from males and females pursuing optimal dietary and behavioral strategies to satisfy sex-specific energetic demands. We further suggest that sexual segregation represents an important constraint on fission–fusion dynamics that should be considered when assessing the potential for variability in subgroup composition.

Keywords

Ateles Fission–fusion dynamics Sex differences Sexual segregation Social organization 

References

  1. Aureli, F., Schaffner, C. M., Boesch, C., Bearder, S. K., Call, J., Chapman, C. A., et al. (2008). Fission-fusion dynamics. Current Anthropology, 49, 627–654.Google Scholar
  2. Boesch, C. (1996). Social grouping in Taï chimpanzees. In W. C. McGrew, L. F. Marchant, & T. Nishida (Eds.), Great ape societies (pp. 101–113). Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bon, R. (1991). Social and spatial segregation of males and females in polygamous ungulates: Proximate factors. In F. Spitz, G. Janeau, G. Gonzalez, & S. Aulagnier (Eds.), Ongules/ungulates (pp. 195–198). Paris/Toulouse: SFEPM-IRGM.Google Scholar
  4. Bonenfant, C., Gaillard, J., Dray, S., Loison, A., Royer, M., & Chessel, D. (2007). Testing sexual segregation: old ways are best. Ecology, 88, 3202–3208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowyer, R. T. (2004). Sexual segregation in ruminants: definitions, hypotheses, and implications for conservation and management. Journal of Mammalogy, 85, 1039–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowyer, T. R., Kie, J. G., & Van Ballenberghe, V. (1996). Sexual segregation in black-tailed deer: effect of scale. Journal of Wildlife Management, 60, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, C. J. (2003). Female-directed aggression in free-ranging Ateles geoffroyi. International Journal of Primatology, 24, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, C. J., & Gibson, K. N. (2008). Spider monkey reproduction and sexual behavior. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Spider monkeys: Behavior,ecology,and evolution of the genus Ateles (pp. 266–287). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman, C. A. (1990). Association patterns of spider monkeys: the influence of ecology and sex on social organization. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1983). Selection in relation to sex. In D. S. Bendall (Ed.), Evolution from molecules to men (pp. 457–481). Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Iason, G. R., Albon, S. D., & Guiness, F. E. (1982). Effects of lactation on feeding behaviour and habitat use in wild red deer hinds. Journal of Zoology, 198, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conradt, L. (1998). Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminant? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 265, 1359–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conradt, L. (1999). Social segregation is not a consequence of habitat segregation in red deer and feral soay sheep. Animal Behaviour, 57, 1151–1157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conradt, L., Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Guinness, F. E. (2000). Sex differences in weather sensitivity can cause habitat segregation: Red deer as an example. Animal Behaviour, 59, 1049–1060.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2000). Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 267, 2213–2218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, T. R., Cherel, Y., Bost, C. A., & Tremblayz, M. (2007). Chick-rearing Crozet shags (Phalacrocorax melanogenis) display sex-specific foraging behaviour. Antarctic Science, 19, 55–63.Google Scholar
  17. Darden, S. K., James, R., Ramnarine, I. W., & Croft, D. P. (2009). Social implications of the battle of the sexes: sexual harassment disrupts female sociality and social recognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276, 2651–2656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (1st ed.). London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Di Fiore, A., & Campbell, C. J. (2007). The Atelines: Variation in ecology, behavior, and social organization. In C. J. Campbell, S. Bearder, A. Fuentes, K. C. MacKinnon, & M. Panger (Eds.), Primates in perspective (pp. 155–185). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Di Fiore, A., Link, A., Spehar, S. N., & Schmitt, C. A. (2009). Dispersal patterns in sympatric woolly and spider monkeys: integrating molecular and observational data. Behaviour, 146, 437–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eisenberg, J. F. (1973). Reproduction in two species of spider monkeys, Ateles fusciceps and Ateles geoffroyi. Journal of Mammalogy, 54, 955–957.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, K. J., Pavelka, M. S., Hartwell, K. S., & Notman, H. (2012). Do adult male spider monkeys (Atelesgeoffroyi) preferentially handle male infants? International Journal of Primatology, 33, 799–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fedigan, L. M. (1992). Primate paradigms: Sex roles and social bonds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fedigan, L. M., & Baxter, M. J. (1984). Sex differences and social organization in free-ranging spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Primates, 25, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Key, C., & Ross, C. (1999). Sex differences in energy expenditure in non-human primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 266, 2479–2485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knott, C. D. (1999). Reproductive,physiological and behavioral responses of orangutans in Borneo to fluctuations in food availability. PhD dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  28. Link, A., Di Fiore, A., & Spehar, S. N. (2009). Female directed aggression and social control in spider monkeys. In M. N. Muller & R. W. Wrangham (Eds.), Sexual coercion in primates and humans: An evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females (pp. 157–187). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Loe, L. E., Irvine, R. J., Bonenfant, C., Stien, A., Langvatn, R., Albon, S. D., et al. (2006). Testing five hypotheses of sexual segregation in an arctic ungulate. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 485–496.Google Scholar
  30. Main, M. B., Weckerly, F. W., & Bleich, V. C. (1996). Sexual segregation in ungulates: new directions for research. Journal of Mammalogy, 77, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matsumoto-Oda, A., Hosaka, K., Huffman, M. A., & Kawanaka, K. (1998). Factors affecting party size in chimpanzees of the Mahale mountains. International Journal of Primatology, 19, 999–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCullough, D., Hirth, D., & Newhouse, S. (1989). Resource partitioning between the sexes in white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management, 53, 277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meerman, J. C. (1999). Rapid ecological assessment of Runaway Creek. Belize: Zoological Society of Milwaukee.Google Scholar
  34. Milton, K. (1981). Estimates of reproductive parameters for free-ranging Ateles geoffroyi. Primates, 22, 574–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newton-Fisher, N. E., Reynolds, V., & Plumptre, A. J. (2000). Food supply and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) party size in the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 21, 613–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2003). A sexual selection theory longitudinal analysis of sexual segregation and integration in early adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 257–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramos-Fernandez, G. (2005). Vocal communication in a fission-fusion society: Do spider monkeys stay in touch with close associates? International Journal of Primatology, 26, 1077–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramos-Fernandez, G., Boyer, D., Aureli, F., & Vick, L. G. (2009). Association networks in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 63, 999–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ren, B., Li, D., Garber, P. A., & Li, M. (2012). Fission–fusion behavior in Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) in Yunnan, China. International Journal of Primatology, 33, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruckstuhl, K. E. (1998). Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep. Animal Behaviour, 55, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruckstuhl, K. E. (2007). Sexual segregation in vertebrates: proximate and ultimate causes. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 47, 245–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruckstuhl, K. E., & Neuhaus, P. (2000). Sexual segregation in ungulates: a new approach. Behaviour, 137, 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruckstuhl, K. E., & Neuhaus, P. (2002). Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 77, 77–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruckstuhl, K. E., & Neuhaus, P. (2005). Sexual segregation in vertebrates: Ecology of the two sexes. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sakura, O. (1994). Factors affecting party size and composition of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) Bossou, Guinea. International Journal of Primatology, 15, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shimooka, Y. (2005). Sexual differences in ranging of Ateles belzebuth belzebuth at La Macarena, Colombia. International Journal of Primatology, 26, 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shimooka, Y., Campbell, C., Di Fiore, A., Felton, A. M., Izawa, K., Link, A., & Wallace, R. (2008). Demography and group composition of Ateles. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Spider monkeys: Behavior,ecology,and evolution of the genus Ateles (pp. 329–348). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Silk, J. B. (1999). Why are infants so attractive to others? The form and function of infant handling in bonnet macaques. Animal Behaviour, 57, 1021–1032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh, N. J., Bonenfant, C., Yoccoz, N. G., & Cote, S. D. (2010). Sexual segregation in Eurasian wild sheep. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 410–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Slater, K. Y., Schaffner, C. M., & Aureli, F. (2007). Embraces for infant handling in spider monkeys: evidence for a biological market? Animal Behaviour, 74, 455–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Slater, K. Y., Schaffner, C. M., & Aureli, F. (2009). Sex differences in the social behavior of wild spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi yucatanensis). American Journal of Primatology, 71, 21–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spehar, S. N., Link, A., & Di Fiore, A. (2010). Male and female range use in a group of white-bellied spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth) in Yasuni National Park, Ecuador. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 129–141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Stanford, C. B., Wallis, J., Mpongo, E., & Goodall, J. (1994). Hunting decisions in wild chimpanzees. Behaviour, 131, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stokke, S. (1999). Sex differences in feeding-patch choice in a megaherbivore: elephants in Chobe National Park, Botswana. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77, 1723–1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stumpf, R. M. (2007). Chimpanzees and bonobos. In C. J. Campbell, S. Bearder, A. Fuentes, K. C. MacKinnon, & M. Panger (Eds.), Primates in perspective (pp. 321–344). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Sueur, C., Jacobs, A., Amblard, F., Petit, O., & King, A. J. (2011). How can social network analysis improve the study of primate behavior? American Journal of Primatology, 73, 703–719.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Symington, M. M. (1988). Demography, ranging patterns, and activity budgets of black spider monkeys (Ateles paniscus chamek) in the Manu National Park, Peru. American Journal of Primatology, 15, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  59. Villaret, J. C., & Bon, R. (1995). Social and spatial segregation in Alpine ibex (Capra ibex) in Bargy, French Alps. Ethology, 101, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wallace, R. B. (2008). Factors influencing spider monkey habitat use and ranging patterns. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Spider monkeys: Behavior, ecology, and evolution of the genus Ateles (pp. 138–154). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Watts, D. P. (2005). Sexual segregation in non-human primates. In K. E. Ruckstuh & P. Neuhaus (Eds.), Sexual segregation in vertebrates: Ecology of the two sexes (pp. 327–347). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Whitehead, H., Waters, S., & Lyrholm, T. (1991). Social organization of female sperm whales and their offspring: constant companions and casual acquaintances. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 29, 385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiens, J. A. (1989). Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology, 3, 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wrangham, R. W. (1979). Sex differences in chimpanzee dispersion. In D. A. Hamburg & E. R. McCown (Eds.), The great apes (pp. 481–489). Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
  65. Wrangham, R. W., & Smuts, B. B. (1980). Sex differences in the behavioural ecology of chimpanzees in the Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 28(Supplement), 13–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Xavier, J. C., Croxall, J. P., & Reid, K. (2003). Interannual variation in the diets of two albatross species breeding in South Georgia: implications for breeding performance. Ibis, 14, 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Young, D. D., & Cockcroft, V. G. (1994). Diet of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) off the south-east coast of southern Africa – opportunism or specialization. Journal of Zoology, 234, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kayla S. Hartwell
    • 1
  • Hugh Notman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christophe Bonenfant
    • 3
  • Mary S. M. Pavelka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyAthabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada
  3. 3.Laboratoire Biométrie et Biologie Évolutive – UMR CNRS 5558Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1Villeurbanne CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations