Advertisement

Growth and Development in Wild Owl Monkeys (Aotus azarai) of Argentina

  • Maren HuckEmail author
  • Marcelo Rotundo
  • Eduardo Fernandez-Duque
Article

Abstract

Life history predicts that in sexually dimorphic species in which males are the larger sex, males should reach sexual maturity later than females (or vice versa if females are the larger sex). The corresponding prediction that in sexually monomorphic species maturational rates will differ little between the sexes has rarely been tested. We report here sex differences in growth and development to adulthood for 70 female and 69 male wild owl monkeys (Aotus azarai). In addition, using evidence from natal dispersal and first reproduction (mean: 74 mo) for 7 individuals of known age, we assigned ages to categories: infant, 0–6 mo; juvenile, 6.1–24 mo; subadult, 24.1–48 mo; adult >48 mo. We compared von Bertalanffy growth curves and growth rates derived from linear piecewise regressions for juvenile and subadult females and males. Growth rates did not differ between the sexes, although juvenile females were slightly longer than males. Females reached maximum maxillary canine height at ca. 2 yr, about a year earlier than males, and females’ maxillary canines were shorter than males’. Thus apart from canine eruption and possibly crown–rump length, the development of Azara’s owl monkeys conforms to the prediction by life history that in monomorphic species the sexes should develop at similar paces.

Keywords

First reproduction Growth rates Ontogeny Sexual monomorphism von Bertalanffy growth model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank all the students, volunteers, and assistants who helped us during the capture and examination of subjects. We also thank Mr. F. Middleton, Manager of Estancia Guaycolec, and Ing. C. Cimino (Bellamar Estancias) for the continued support of the Owl Monkey Project. The Ministerio de la Producción, Subsecretaría de Ecología and Recursos Naturales, and Dirección de Fauna from Formosa Province provided permits to conduct the research. The Owl Monkey Project has had continued approval for all research presented here by the Formosa Province Council of Veterinarian Doctors, the Directorate of Wildlife, the Subsecretary of Ecology and Natural Resources, and the Ministry of Production. At the national level, the procedures were approved by the National Wildlife Directorate in Argentina and by the IACUC committees of the Zoological Society of San Diego (2000–2005) and of the University of Pennsylvania (2006–2010). We thank Claudia Valeggia, Susan Anton, Joanna Setchell, and anonymous reviewers for useful comments on earlier drafts. We thank Uwe Liggers and Derek Ogle for help with the FSA package. E. Fernandez-Duque gratefully acknowledges the financial support during all these years from the Wenner-Gren Foundation, the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation, the National Geographic Society, the National Science Foundation (BCS- 0621020), the University of Pennsylvania Research Foundation, and the Zoological Society of San Diego. M. Huck was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (HU 1746/2-1).

Supplementary material

10764_2011_9530_MOESM1_ESM.doc (186 kb)
Tables SI and SII (DOC 186 kb)
10764_2011_9530_MOESM2_ESM.doc (189 kb)
ESM Fig. 1 Various bodily measurements of owl monkeys in relation to age. Correlation between age and left hind limb length in (a) females and (b) males; between age and left forelimb length in (c) females and (d) males; between age and crown–heel length in (e) females and (f) males; between age and heel–toe length in (g) females and (h) males; between age and neck circumference in (i) females and (j) males. LOESS curves are fitted through correlational scatterplots. Female data points are represented by circles, those of males by triangles. Large circles or triangles represent data for individuals of known age; smaller symbols data for individuals with estimated ages. For details on methods regarding limb length, crown–heel length, heel–toe length, and neck circumference see Fernandez-Duque (in press). (DOC 189 kb)
10764_2011_9530_MOESM3_ESM.doc (160 kb)
ESM Fig. 2 Teeth measurements of owl monkeys in relation to age. Correlation between age and mandibular canine height in (a) females and (b) males; between age and mandibular canine width in (c) females and (d) males; between age and maxillar canine width in (e) females and (f) males; and box plot for teeth stain at different ages in (g) females and (h) males. LOESS curves are fitted through correlational scatterplots. Female data points are represented by circles, those of males by triangles. Large circles or triangles represent data for individuals of known age; smaller symbols, data for individuals with estimated ages. Box plots represent medians, interquartile ranges (IQRs), and ranges (excluding only values larger than ±1.5 times the IQR; outliers beyond this range are represented as open circles). The notches in the boxes indicate values ±1.58 times IQR/√n, which corresponds roughly to a 95% confidence interval (R Development Core Team 2008). (DOC 159 kb)
10764_2011_9530_MOESM4_ESM.doc (42 kb)
ESM Fig. 3 Box plot for nipple color in female owl monkeys. Box plots represent medians, interquartile ranges (IQRs), and ranges (excluding only values larger than ±1.5 times the IQR; outliers beyond this range are represented as open circles). The notches in the boxes indicate values ±1.58 times IQR/√n, which corresponds roughly to a 95% confidence interval (R Development Core Team 2008). (DOC 41.5 kb)

References

  1. Altmann, J., Alberts, S., & Sapolsky, R. M. (1992). Endocrine and developmental correlates of unilateral cryptorchidism in a wild baboon. American Journal of Primatology, 26(4), 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquino, R., & Encarnación, F. (1986). Population structure of Aotus nancymai (Cebidae: Primates) in Peruvian Amazon lowland forest. American Journal of Primatology, 11, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badyaev, A. V. (2002a). Growing apart: An ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(8), 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badyaev, A. V. (2002b). Male and female growth in sexually dimorphic species: Harmony, conflict, or both? Comments on Theoretical Biology, 7, 11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolter, D. R., & Zihlman, A. L. (2003). Morphometric analysis of growth and development in wild-collected vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops), with implications for growth patterns in Old World monkeys, apes and humans. Journal of Zoology (London), 260(1), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonett, D. G., & Price, R. M. (2002). Statistical inference for a linear function of medians: Confidence intervals, hypothesis testing, and sample size requirements. Psychological Methods, 7(3), 370–383.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, A. D., & Zunino, G. E. (1994). Hábitat, densidad y problemas de conservación de los primates en Argentina. Vida Silvestre Neotropical, 3(1), 30–40.Google Scholar
  8. Cleveland, W. S., & Devlin, S. J. (1988). Locally weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(403), 596–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colegrave, N., & Ruxton, G. D. (2003). Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations. Behavioral Ecology, 14(3), 446–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawley, M. J. (2007). The R Book. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixson, A. F. (1983). The owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus ). In J. P. Hearn (Ed.), Reproduction in New World primates: New models in medical sciences (pp. 69–113). Lancaster: International Medical Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dixson, A. F. (1994). Reproductive biology of the owl monkey. In J. F. Baer, R. E. Weller, & I. Kakoma (Eds.), Aotus: The owl monkey (pp. 113–132). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dixson, A. F., Gardner, J. S., & Bonney, R. C. (1980). Puberty in the male owl monkeys (Aotus trivirgatus griseimembra): A study of physical and hormonal development. International Journal of Primatology, 1(2), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez-Duque, E. (2002). Environmental determinants of birth seasonality in night monkeys (Aotus azarai) of the Argentinian Chaco. International Journal of Primatology, 23(3), 639–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernandez-Duque, E. (2008). Behavior, ecology, and demography of Aotus vociferans in Yasuní National Park, Ecuador. International Journal of Primatology, 29(2), 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernandez-Duque, E. (2009). Natal dispersal in monogamous owl monkeys (Aotus azarai) of the Argentinean Chaco. Behaviour, 146(4–5), 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandez-Duque, E. (2011). Aotinae: Social monogamy in the only nocturnal anthropoid. In C. J. Campbell, A. Fuentes, K. C. MacKinnon, S. K. Bearder, & R. Stumpf (Eds.), Primates in perspective (2nd ed., pp. 139–154). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fernandez-Duque, E. (in press). Rensch’s rule, Bergman’s effect and adult sexual dimorphism in wild monogamous owl monkeys (Aotus azarai) of Argentina. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21541.
  19. Fernandez-Duque, E., de la Iglesia, H., & Erkert, H. G. (2010). Moonstruck primates: Owl monkeys (Aotus) need moonlight for nocturnal activity in their natural environment. PLoS ONE, 5(9), e12572.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernandez-Duque, E., & Rotundo, M. (2003). Field methods for capturing and marking azarai night monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 24(5), 1113–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernandez-Duque, E., Rotundo, M., & Sloan, C. (2001). Density and population structure of owl monkeys (Aotus azarai) in the Argentinean Chaco. American Journal of Primatology, 53(3), 99–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernandez-Duque, E., Valeggia, C. R., & Mendoza, S. P. (2009). The biology of paternal care in human and nonhuman primates. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gálvez-Durand, J., Montoya, E., Gálvez, H., & Ique, C. (2004). Desarrollo biométrico en Aotus Nancymae nacidos en cautiverio. In R. Bodmer (Ed.), VI Congreso Internacional sobre Manejo de Fauna Silvestre en la Amazonia y Latinoamérica (pp. 6–11). September 5–10, 2004; Iquitos, Perú.Google Scholar
  24. Gozalo, A., & Montoya, E. (1990). Reproduction of the owl monkey (Aotus nancymai) (primates: Cebidae) in captivity. American Journal of Primatology, 21(1), 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall, R. D., Beattie, R. J., & Wyckoff, G. H. (1979). Weight gains and sequence of dental eruptions in infant owl monkeys (Aotus trivirgatus). In G. C. Ruppenthal (Ed.), Nursery care of nonhuman primates (pp. 321–329). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hayama, S-I, Kamiya, S., & Nigi, H. (1997). Morphological changes of female reproductive organs of Japanese monkeys with reproductive conditions. Primates, 38(4), 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holst, M., & Stirling, I. (2002). A comparison of ringed seal (Phoca hispida) biology on the east and west sides of the North Water Polynya, Baffin Bay. Aquatic Mammals, 28(3), 221–230.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, J. B., & Omland, K. S. (2004). Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19(2), 101–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Juárez, C. P., Rotundo, M. A., Berg, W., & Fernández-Duque, E. (2011). Costs and benefits of radio-collaring on the behavior, demography and conservation of owl monkeys (Aotus azarai) in Formosa, Argentina. International Journal of Primatology, 32(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. King, S. J., Morelli, T. L., Arrigo-Nelson, S., Ratelolahy, F. J., Godfrey, L. R., Wyatt, J., et al. (2011). Morphometrics and pattern of growth in wild sifakas (Propithecus edwardsi) at Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology, 73(1), 155–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, P. C., Majluf, P., Gordon, I. J. (1991). Growth, weaning and maternal investment from a comparative perspective. Journal of Zoology (London), 225, 99–114.Google Scholar
  32. Leigh, S. R. (1992). Patterns of variation in the ontogeny of primate body size dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution, 23, 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leigh, S. R. (1994). Relations between captive and noncaptive weights in anthropoid primates. Zoo Biology, 13, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leigh, S. R. (1995). Socioecology and the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 97(4), 339–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leigh, S. R., & Terranova, C. J. (1998). Comparative perspectives on bimaturism, ontogeny, and dimorphism in lemurid primates. International Journal of Primatology, 19(4), 723–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mendes Pontes, A. R., & Cruz, M. A. O. Md. (1995). Home range, intergroup transfers, and reproductive status of common marmosets Callithrix jacchus in a forest fragment in northeastern Brazil. Primates, 26, 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mooij, W. M., Rooij, J. M. V., & Wijnhoven, S. (1999). Analysis and comparison of growth from small samples of length-at-age data: Detection of sequal dimorphism in Eurasian perch as an example. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 128, 483–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nakagawa, S., & Cuthill, I. C. (2007). Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: A practical guide for biologists. Biological Reviews, 82, 591–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ogle, D. H. (2010). Accompanying documentation to the FSA package: http://www.ncfaculty.net/dogle/fishR/gnrlex/VonBertalanffyCompare/VonBertalanffyCompare.pdf (Accessed January 14, 2011).
  40. Pereira, M. E., & Altmann, J. (1985). Development of social behavior in free-living nonhuman primates. In E. S. Watts (Ed.), Nonhuman primate models for human growth and development (pp. 217–309). New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
  41. Pereira, M. E., & Fairbanks, L. A. (1993). Juvenile primates: Life history, development, and behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Plavcan, M. J. (1993). Canine size and shape in male anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 92, 201–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  44. Ritz, C., & Streibig, J. C. (2008). Nonlinear regression with R (p. 144). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Rotundo, M., Fernandez-Duque, E., & Dixon, A. F. (2005). Infant development and parental care in free-ranging Aotus azarai azarai in Argentina. International Journal of Primatology, 26(6), 1459–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rowell, T. E. (1977). Variation in age at puberty in monkeys. Folia Primatologica, 27, 284–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rubenstein, D. I. (1993). On the evolution of juvenile life-styles in mammals. In M. E. Pereira & L. A. Fairbanks (Eds.), Juvenile primates: Life history, development, and behavior (pp. 38–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Setchell, J. M., & Lee, P. C. (2004). Development and sexual selection in primates. In P. Kappeler & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Sexual selection in primates: Causes, mechanisms and consequences (pp. 175–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Setchell, J. M., Lee, P. C., Wickings, E. J., & Dixson, A. F. (2001). Growth and ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in the mandrill (Mandrillus sphinx). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 115, 349–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shea, B. T. (1986). Ontogenetic approaches to sexual dimorphism in anthropoids. Human Evolution, 1, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Silk, J. B., & Brown, G. R. (2008). Local resource competition and local resource enhancement shape primate birth sex ratios. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 275, 1761–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, R. J., & Leigh, S. R. (1998). Sexual dimorphism in primate neonatal body mass. Journal of Human Evolution, 34, 173–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strum, S. C. (1991). Weight and age in wild olive baboons. American Journal of Primatology, 25(4), 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Takai, M., Nishimura, T., Shigehara, N., & Setoguchi, T. (2009). Meaning of the canine sexual dimorphism in fossil owl monkey, Aotus dindensis from the middle Miocene of La Venta, Colombia. Comparative Dental Morphology, 13, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whitten, P. L., & Turner, T. R. (2009). Endocrine mechanisms of primate life history trade-offs: Growth and reproductive maturation in vervet monkeys. American Journal of Human Biology, 21, 754–761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wright, P. C. (1981). The night monkeys, genus Aotus. In A. Coimbra-Filho & R. A. Mittermeier (Eds.), Ecology and behavior of Neotropical primates (pp. 211–240). Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.Google Scholar
  57. Wright, P. C. (1989). The nocturnal primate niche in the New World. Journal of Human Evolution, 18, 635–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maren Huck
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marcelo Rotundo
    • 2
  • Eduardo Fernandez-Duque
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Barrio Gen. J. de San MartínFormosaArgentina
  3. 3.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)Av Rivadavia 1917, C1033AAJArgentina

Personalised recommendations