Advertisement

International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 914–923 | Cite as

Copulation Calls in Female Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) Convey Identity but Do Not Accurately Reflect Fertility

  • Simon William TownsendEmail author
  • Tobias Deschner
  • Klaus Zuberbühler
Article

Abstract

Copulation calls are a relatively common feature of female primate behavior thought to function in the advertisement of female receptivity and subsequent incitation of malemale competition. To date, the majority of work on copulation calling behavior has focused on various monkey species, with little empirical evidence from the great apes. Previous research on wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) has suggested that estrous females produce copulation calls to avoid monopolization by single males and to minimize competition from other females. We here extended these findings by investigating to what degree these social demands were reflected in the calls’ acoustic structure. We recorded and acoustically analyzed 71 copulation call bouts from 6 adult female chimpanzees in the Budongo Forest, Uganda. We did not find any acoustic differences in calls given by females in fertile and nonfertile periods, as assessed by their hormonal profiles. However, the calls’ acoustic structure did reliably encode identity cues of the calling female. We propose that, in chimpanzees, the use and morphology of copulation calls have jointly been shaped by the selective advantage of concealing fertility. Owing to the low visibility conditions associated with chimpanzees’ natural forest habitat and their dispersed social system, providing identity cues may be of particular biological relevance for these nonhuman primates.

Keywords

Acoustic structure Chimpanzees Female–female competition Information content 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Ugandan Wildlife Authority and the President’s Office of the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology for permission to work in the forest. We thank Vernon Reynolds and Fred Babweteera for their support; Eric Bowman and Roger Mundry for their statistical advice; Vera Schmeling for assistance with the hormone analysis; Joanna Setchell, Manuela Cadilek, and 2 anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript; and Monday M. Gideon for his invaluable help and company in the forest. This study was funded by the BBSRC, the Leverhulme Trust, and the Max Planck Society. We thank the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland for providing core funding to the Budongo Conservation Field Station. We dedicate this study to the memory of our friend and colleague, the late Odong-too Richard.

References

  1. Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
  2. Bahr, N. I., Palme, R., Möhle, U., Hodges, J. K., & Heistermann, M. (2000). Comparative aspects of the metabolism and excretion of cortisol in three individual nonhuman primates. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 117, 427–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bielert, C., & van der Walt, L. A. (1982). Male chacma baboon (Papio ursinus) sexual arousal; mediation by visual cues from female conspecifics. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 7, 31–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boesch, C., & Boesch Achermann, H. (2000). The chimpanzees of the Tai Forest: Behavioral ecology and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cox, C. R., & LeBoeuf, B. J. (1977). Female incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection. American Naturalist, 111, 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deschner, T., & Boesch, C. (2007). Can the patterns of sexual swelling cycles in female Taï chimpanzees be explained by the cost-of-sexual-attraction hypothesis? International Journal of Primatology, 28(2), 389–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deschner, T., Heistermann, M., Hodges, K., & Boesch, C. (2003). Timing and probability of ovulation in relation to sex skin swelling in wild West African chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus. Animal Behaviour, 66, 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deschner, T., Heistermann, M., Hodges, K., & Boesch, C. (2004). Female sexual swelling size, timing of ovulation and male behaviour in wild West African chimpanzees. Hormones and Behaviour, 45, 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Waal, F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. London: Cape.Google Scholar
  10. Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Emery Thompson, M., Stumpf, R. M., & Pusey, A. E. (2008). Female reproductive strategies and competition in apes. International Journal of Primatology, 29, 815–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Furuichi, T. (1987). Sexual swelling, receptivity, and grouping of wild pygmy chimpanzee females at Wamba, Zaire. Primates, 23(3), 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behaviour. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton, W. J. I., & Arrowood, P. C. (1978). Copulatory vocalizations of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus), gibbons (Hylobates hoolock), and humans. Science, 200, 1405–1409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henzi, S. P. (1996). Copulation calls and paternity in chacma baboons. Animal Behaviour, 51, 233–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Higham, J. P., MacLarnon, A., Ross, C., Heistermann, M., & Semple, S. (2008). Baboon sexual swellings: information content of size and color. Hormones and Behaviour, 53, 452–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahlenberg, S. M. (2006). Female-female competition and male sexual coercion in wild Kanyawara chimpanzees. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  18. Kahlenberg, S. M., Emery Thompson, M., Muller, M. N., & Wrangham, R. W. (2008). Immigration costs for female chimpanzees and male protection as an immigrant counterstrategy to intrasexual aggression. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1497–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kahlenberg, S. M., Emery Thompson, M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2008). Female competition over core areas among Kanyawara chimpanzees, Kibale National Park, Uganda. International Journal of Primatology, 29, 931–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muller, M., Emery-Thompson, M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2006). Male chimpanzees prefer mating with old females. Current Biology, 16, 2234–2238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mundry, R., & Sommer, C. (2007). Discriminant function analysis with non-independent data: consequences and an alternative. Animal Behaviour, 74, 965–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murray, C. M., Wroblewski, E., & Pusey, A. E. (2007). New case of intragroup infanticide in the chimpanzees of Gombe National Park. International Journal of Primatology, 28, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nikitopoulos, E., Arnhem, E., van Hooff, J., & Sterck, E. (2004). Influence of female copulation calls on male sexual behavior in captive Macaca fascicularis. International Journal of Primatology, 25, 659–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Connell, S. M., & Cowlishaw, G. (1994). Infanticide avoidance, sperm competition and mate choice: the function of copulation calls in female baboons. Animal Behaviour, 48, 687–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oda, R., & Masataka, N. (1995). Function of copulatory vocalizations in mate choice by female Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Folia Primatologica, 64, 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pfefferle, D., Brauch, K., Heistermann, M., Hodges, J. K., & Fischer, J. (2008). Female Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus) copulation calls do not reveal the fertile phase but influence mating outcome. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 275, 571–578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Poole, J. H., Payne, K. B., Langbauer, W., Jr., & Moss, C. J. (1988). The social contexts of some very low frequency calls of African elephants. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pradhan, G. R., & van Schaik, C. (2008). Infanticide-driven intersexual conflict over matings in primates and its effects on social organisation. Behaviour, 145, 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pradhan, G., Engelhard, A., van Schaik, C. P., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). The evolution of female copulation calls in primates: a review and a new model. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pusey, A. E., Williams, J., & Goodall, J. (1997). The influence of dominance rank on the reproductive success of female chimpanzees. Science, 277, 828–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reynolds, V. (2005). The chimpanzees of the Budongo forest – Ecology, behaviour, and conservation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Semple, S. (1998). The function of Barbary macaque copulation calls. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 265, 287–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Semple, S. (2001). Individuality and male discrimination of female copulation calls in the yellow baboon. Animal Behaviour, 61, 1023–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Semple, S., McComb, K., Alberts, S., & Altmann, J. (2002). Informational content of female copulation calls in yellow baboons. American Journal of Primatology, 56, 43–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slocombe, K. E., & Zuberbühler, K. (2007). Chimpanzees modify recruitment screams as a function of audience composition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104(43), 17228–17233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tibbetts, E. A., & Dale, J. (2007). Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 22, 529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Townsend, S. W., Slocombe, K. E., Emery-Thompson, M., & Zuberbühler, K. (2007). Female-led infanticide in wild chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17(10), 355–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Townsend, S. W., Deschner, T., & Zuberbühler, K. (2008). Female chimpanzees use copulation calls flexibly to prevent social competition. PloS One, 3(6), e2431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Schaik, C. P. (2000). Infanticide by male primates: The sexual selection hypothesis revisited. In C. P. van Schaik & C. H. Janson (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 27–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon William Townsend
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Tobias Deschner
    • 4
  • Klaus Zuberbühler
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of St AndrewsSt AndrewsUK
  2. 2.Budongo Conservation Field StationMasindiUganda
  3. 3.Animal Behaviour Group, Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental StudiesUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary AnthropologyLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations