Advertisement

International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 737–754 | Cite as

Quantifying Primate Food Distribution and Abundance for Socioecological Studies: An Objective Consumer-centered Method

  • Erin Rebecca Vogel
  • Charles H. Janson
Article

Abstract

Food abundance and distribution have played a central role in the conceptual theory of primate socioecology. This theory predicts that agonistic (contest) competition should occur when food is distributed in discrete, defensible patches; in contrast, when food sources are distributed uniformly or randomly, nonagonistic (scramble) competition is expected. Primatologists usually measure resource density and patchiness from a botanical perspective, without an explicit link to the biology of the animal being studied. Such an approach may be irrelevant to how the animals view the dispersion of resources. For studies related to feeding competition, we suggest the use of a method that provides a consumer-based index of food distribution. We then describe such an approach and apply it to understand agonistic behavior in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus), at Lomas Barbudal. Instead of choosing sample plots at random, we use each actual feeding tree of a group as the center of a sample plot and we use the monkey species’ average group spread as the sampling area. This focal tree method allows us to evaluate the resource availability both within and outside of the feeding tree during a particular feeding bout. To summarize the spatial distribution of food at the level of a foraging group, we define and use an extension of Lloyd’s Dispersion Index, Lloyd’s Extended Index (LEI), designed to allow the inclusion of resources of diverse sizes and species in a single measure. We evaluate if LEI can be used to predict the frequency of aggression, if changing the area of the plot alters these results, and if calculating LEI based on fruit abundance or fruit biomass better predicts the frequency of aggression in this population of capuchins. In support of socioecological predictions, our results show that the frequency of agonism in a focal tree declines as LEI increases. This relationship is significant when LEI is calculated using a 20-m plot size and weighting tree size by fruit counts, but not when using larger plot sizes, unweighted tree counts, or weighting by fruit biomass. Our approach demonstrates the importance of carefully considering plot size and different measures of food availability when testing socioecological models relating resource distribution and quality to aggression in nonhuman primates.

Keywords

Cebus capucinus Competition Focal-tree method Lloyd’s Index of Dispersion Monkeys Resource distribution 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work would not have been possible without the expert field assistance of Alexander Fuentes Jimenez, Juan Carlos Ordonez, Yoella Teplitsky, Thomas Pendergast, and Anastasia Cronin. We thank the Costa Rican Servicio de Parques Naciónales and the ACT for granting E. R. Vogel permission to work in Lomas Barbudal Biological Reserve; Finca El Pelón de la Bajura for granting ERV permission to work on their private lands; Drs. Julie Gros-Louis, Susan Perry, and Joseph Manson for logistic support in the field; The Behavioral Ecology Group at Stony Brook University; and Jessica Rothman, Andreas Koenig, Melissa Mark, John Wiedenmann, Nathaniel Dominy, Lynn Isbell, and 2 anonymous reviewers from comments and constructive criticism of a previous draft. This research was funded by grants to E. R. Vogel from NSF (DIG 23720-1021441-1), the Leakey Foundation (431-1770A), the Organization for Tropical Studies, a Graduate Aid in Areas of National Need (GAANN) Fellowship, and the Department of Ecology and Evolution at Stony Brook Slobodkin Research Award.

References

  1. Barton, R. A., & Whiten, A. (1993). Feeding competition among female olive baboons, Papio anubis. Animal Behaviour, 46, 777–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borries, C., Larney, E., Lu, A., Ossi, K., & Koenig, A. (2008). Costs of group size: lower developmental and reproductive rates in larger groups of leaf monkeys. Behavioral Ecology, 19(6), 1186–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapman, C. A., Chapman, L. J., Wrangham, R., Hunt, K., Gebo, D., & Gardner, L. (1992). Estimators of fruit abundance of tropical trees. Biotropica, 24, 527–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman, C. A., Wrangham, R. W., & Chapman, L. J. (1995). Ecological constraints on group-size —an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 36, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapman, C. A., Chapman, L. J., Rode, K. D., Hauck, E. M., & McDowell, L. R. (2003). Variation in the nutritional value of primate foods among trees, time periods, and areas. International Journal of Primatology, 24(2), 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cottam, G., & Curtis, J. T. (1956). The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology, 37, 451–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Bitetti, M. S., & Janson, C. H. (2001). Social foraging and the finder’s share in capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Animal Behaviour, 62, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doran, D. M., McNeilage, A., Greer, D., Bocian, C., Mehlman, P., & Shah, N. (2002). Western lowland gorilla diet and resource availability: new evidence, cross-site comparisons, and reflections on indirect sampling methods. American Journal of Primatology, 58, 91–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubois, F., & Giraldeau, L. A. (2003). The forager’s dilemma: food sharing and food defense as risk-sensitive foraging options. The American Naturalist, 162(6), 768–779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubois, F., Giraldeau, L. A., & Grant, J. W. A. (2003). Resource defense in a group-foraging context. Behavioral Ecology, 14(1), 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fedigan, L. M. (1984). Demographic trends in the Alouatta palliata and Cebus capucinus populations of Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica. International Journal of Primatology, 5, 338–338.Google Scholar
  12. Fedigan, L. M. (1993). Sex differences and intersexual relations in adult white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). International Journal of Primatology, 14, 853–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fedigan, L. M., Fedigan, L., & Chapman, C. A. (1985). A census of Alouatta palliata and Cebus capucinus in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica. Brenesia, 23, 309–322.Google Scholar
  14. Gore, M. A. (1993). Effects of food distribution on foraging competition in Rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta, and Hamadryas baboons, Papio hamadryas. Animal Behaviour, 45, 773–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, K. R. L. (1963). Variation in the ecology of the chacma baboon. In J. Napier & N. A. Barnicot (Eds.), The primates (pp. 1–28). London: The Zoological Society of London.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, C. H., & Fedigan, L. M. (1997). Spatial benefits accorded by high rank in white-faced capuchins. Animal Behaviour, 53, 1069–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanya, G. (2009). Effects of food type and number of feeding sites in a tree on aggression during feeding in wild Macaca fuscata. International Journal of Primatology, 30(4), 569–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hladik, C. (1977). Field methods for processing food samples. In T. H. Clutton-Brock (Ed.), Primate ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys, and Apes (pp. 595–601). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Isbell, L. A. (1991). Contest and scramble competition: patterns of female aggression and ranging behavior among primates. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Isbell, L. A., & Enstam, K. L. (2002). Predator (in)sensitive foraging in sympatric female vervets (Cercopithecus aethiops) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas): A test of ecological models of group dispersion. In L. Miller (Ed.), Eat or be eaten: Predator sensitive foraging among primates (pp. 154–168). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Isbell, L. A., Pruetz, J. D., & Young, T. P. (1998). Movements of vervets (Cercopithecus aethiops) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) as estimators of food resource size, density, and distribution. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janson, C. H. (1985a). Ecological and social consequences of food competition in brown capuchin monkeys. Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  23. Janson, C. H. (1985b). Aggressive competition and individual food consumption in wild brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 18, 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janson, C. H. (1986). The mating system as a determinant of social evolution in capuchin monkeys. In J. Else & P. C. Lee (Eds.), Primate ecology and conservation (pp. 169–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Janson, C. H. (1987). Ecological correlates of aggression in brown capuchin monkeys. International Journal of Primatology, 8, 431–431.Google Scholar
  26. Janson, C. H. (1988a). Food competition in brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): quantitative effects of group size and tree productivity. Behavior, 105, 54–76.Google Scholar
  27. Janson, C. H. (1988b). Intra-specific food competition and primate social-structure —a synthesis. Behaviour, 105, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Janson, C. H. (1990a). Ecological consequences of individual spatial choice in foraging groups of brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Animal Behaviour, 40, 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Janson, C. H. (1990b). Social correlates of individual spatial choice in foraging groups of brown capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Animal Behaviour, 40, 910–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Janson, C. H. (1996). Towards an experimental socioecology of primates: Examples from Argentine brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus). In M. Norconk, A. Rosenberger, & P. Garber (Eds.), Adaptive radiations of Neotropical primates (pp. 309–325). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  31. Janson, C. H. (2007). Experimental evidence for route integration and strategic planning in wild capuchin monkeys. Animal Cognition, 10(3), 341–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Janson, C. H., & Chapman, C. A. (1999). Resources and primate community structure. In J. G. Fleagle, C. Janson, & K. E. Reed (Eds.), Primate communities (pp. 237–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Janson, C. H., & DiBitetti, M. S. (1997). Experimental analysis of food detection in capuchin monkeys: effects of distance, travel speed, and resource size. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Janson, C. H., & Vogel, E. R. (2006). Estimating the effects of hunger on primate social ecology. In G. Hohmann, Robbins, M., and Boesch, C. (Ed.), Feeding Ecology in Apes and Other Primates (pp. 285–313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kinnaird, M. F. (1992). Variable resource defense by the Tana River crested mangabey. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 31, 115–122.Google Scholar
  36. Koenig, A. (2002). Competition for resources and its behavioral consequences among female primates. International Journal of Primatology, 23(4), 759–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Koenig, A., & Borries, C. (2004). The predictive power of socio-ecological models: A reconsideration of resource characteristics, agonism, and dominance hierarchies. In G. Hohmann, M. Robbins, & C. Boesch (Eds.), Feeding ecology in apes and other primates (pp. 263–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Koenig, A., Beise, J., Chalise, M. K., & Ganzhorn, J. U. (1998). When females should contest for food: testing hypotheses about resource density, distribution, size, and quality with Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Krebs, C. (1999). Ecological methodology (2nd ed., pp. 114–115). Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  40. Leighton, M., & Leighton, D. R. (1982). The relationship of size of feeding aggregate to size of food patch: Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) feeding in Trichilia cipo fruit trees on Barro Colorado Island. Biotropica, 14, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lloyd, M. (1967). Mean crowding. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 36, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McFarland-Symington, M. (1988). Food competition and foraging party size in the black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus chamek). Behaviour, 105, 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morisita, M. (1959). Measuring of the dispersion and analysis of distribution patterns. Memoires of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series E. Biology, 2, 215–235.Google Scholar
  44. Nunes, A. (1995). Foraging and ranging patterns in white-bellied spider monkeys. Folia Primatologica, 65, 85–99.Google Scholar
  45. Oppenheimer, J. R. (1968). Behavior and ecology of the white-faced capuchin monkey Cebus capucinus on Barro Colorado Island. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
  46. Perry, S. (1996). Female-female social relationships in wild white faced capuchins Cebus capucinus. American Journal of Primatology, 40, 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perry, S. (1997). Male-female social relationships in wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Behaviour, 134, 477–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pruetz, J. D., & Isbell, L. A. (2000). Correlations of food distribution and patch size with agonistic interactions in female vervets (Chlorocebus aethiops) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) living in simple habitats. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robinson, J. G. (1986). Seasonal variation in use of time and space by the wedge-capped capuchin monkey, Cebus olivaceus: Implications for foraging theory. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ron, T., Henzi, S. P., & Motro, U. (1996). Do female chacma baboons compete for a safe spatial position in a southern Woodland habitat? Behaviour, 133, 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosenblum, L. A., Kaufman, I. C., & Stynes, A. J. (1969). Interspecific variations in the effects of hunger on diurnally varying behavior elements in macaques. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 2, 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saito, C. (1996). Dominance and feeding success in female Japanese macaques, Macaca fuscata: effects of food patch size and inter-patch distance. Animal Behaviour, 51, 967–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shopland, J. M. (1987). Food quality, spatial deployment, and the intensity of feeding interference in yellow baboons (Papio cyanocephalus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 21, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snaith, T. V., & Chapman, C. A. (2005). Towards an ecological solution to the folivores paradox: patch depletion as an indicator of within-group scramble competition in red colobus monkeys. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 25, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Southwick, C. H. (1967). An experimental study of intragroup agonistic behavior in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behaviour, 28, 182–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Southwick, C. H., Siddiqi, M. F., Farooqui, M. Y., & Pal, B. C. (1976). The effects of artificial feeding on aggressive behavior of rhesus monkeys in India. Animal Behaviour, 24, 11–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stephens, D., & Krebs, J. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Sterck, E. H. M., Watts, D. P., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997). The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stevenson, P. R., Quiñones, M. J., & Ahumada, J. A. (1998). Annual variation of fruiting pattern using two different methods in a lowland tropical forest at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. Biotropica, 30, 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vahl, W. K., Van der Meer, J., Meijer, K., Piersma, T., & Weissing, F. J. (2007). Interference competition, the spatial distribution of food and free-living foragers. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1493–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van Schaik, C. P. (1989). The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. In V. Standen & R. A. Foley (Eds.), Comparative socioecology (pp. 195–218). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
  62. van Schaik, C. P., & van Noordwijk, M. A. (1988). Scramble and contest in feeding competition among female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behaviour, 105, 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vogel, E. R. (2004). The ecological basis of aggression in white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus, in a Costa Rican dry forest. Ph.D. dissertation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.Google Scholar
  64. Vogel, E. R. (2005). Rank differences in energy intake rates in white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus: the effects of contest competition. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 58(4), 333–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vogel, E. R., & Dominy, N. J. (2010). Measuring ecological varaiables for primate field studies. In C. J. Campbell, A. Fuentes, K. C. MacKinnon, M. Panger, & S. K. Bearder (Eds.), Primates in perspective (2nd ed., pp. 367–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Vogel, E. R., & Janson, C. H. (2007). Predicting the frequency of food-related agonism in white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus), using a novel focal-tree method. American Journal of Primatology, 69(5), 533–550.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vogel, E. R., Munch, S. B., & Janson, C. H. (2007). Understanding escalated aggression over food resources in white-faced capuchin monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 74, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitten, P. L. (1983). Diet and dominance among female vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). American Journal of Primatology, 5, 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang, S., & Wang, L. (1995). Comparison of three fruit census methods in French Guiana. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 11, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Center for the Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology, Department of AnthropologyThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biological SciencesUniversity of MontanaMissoulaUSA

Personalised recommendations