Advertisement

International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 616–633 | Cite as

Fostering Appropriate Behavior in Rehabilitant Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus)

  • Kristin A. DescovichEmail author
  • Birute M. Galdikas
  • Andrew Tribe
  • Allan Lisle
  • Clive J. Phillips
Article

Abstract

Rehabilitation centers in Indonesia and Malaysia accommodate displaced orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus and P. abelii) and aim to facilitate their release into the wild by developing in them the skills that are necessary for survival. Regular forest excursions are provided but their efficacy in improving learning of appropriate behaviors is unknown. We observed 40 rehabilitating orangutans from the Orangutan Care and Quarantine Centre during 3 forest excursions each to determine whether their behavior fostered the development of survival skills. In total, 38% of their time was spent in locomotion, particularly quadrupedal arboreal travel (13%), walking (8%), climbing (7%), and vine−swinging (4%). 26.5% of their time was spent ≥ 5 m from the ground, at heights up to 25 m. Arboreal activities were more common early in the excursions and interaction with caregivers more common later (h 1: 0.3% of time; h 5: 0.9% of time). Individuals of lower body mass were significantly more likely to engage in arboreal movement, locomotion in general, eating of bark and leaves, and social play, and less likely to eat insects. Those that had been at the Centre the longest were less likely to perform arboreal activities and significantly more likely to be found standing and at ground level than those that had been there for a shorter time. During this study, many forest food items were consumed, particularly leaves and fruit, but also invertebrates and bark. Little time was spent in sexual behavior, tool use, nest building, or socially mediated learning, but social play occupied almost 6% of their time. We conclude that regular excursions into the forest are likely to assist in the development of locomotion and feeding skills for survival in rehabilitating orangutans, but special attention is needed to encourage nest building, social activities, and arboreal activity. Heavy individuals and those that have been captive for a long time are least likely to benefit.

Keywords

Behavior Juvenile Orangutan Pongo Rehabilitation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Australian Orangutan Project and the Orangutan Foundation International, Orangutan Care and Quarantine Centre in Pangkalan Bun, Kalimantan for financial and in-kind support of the project. In addition, the Indonesian Forestry Department, LIPI, Indonesian Police, Herry Roustaman, and Professor Hadi Alikodra from Institut Pertanian Bogor provided permit and visa support. Assistant Nelly Oktorina, Leif Cocks (Australian Orangutan Project), Professor Colin Groves (Australian National University), Stephen Brend (Orangutan Foundation UK), Ibu Waliyati (Orangutan Foundation Indonesia), and Yeti and the team at the OCQC provided professional support. The editor-in-chief, Dr. Joanna Setchell, and reviewers from the International Journal of Primatology provided valuable advice on the writing of this article.

References

  1. Ancrenaz, M., Calaque, R., & Lackman-Ancrenaz, I. (2004). Orangutan nesting behaviour in disturbed forest in Sabah, Malaysia: Implications for nest census. International Journal of Primatology, 25(5), 983–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bean, A. (1999). Ecology of sex differences in great ape foraging. In P. C. Lee (Ed.), Comparative primate socioecology (pp. 339–362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, C. (1984). Orang-utans und Bonobos im Spiel. Munich: Profil-Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Buckland, H. (2005). The oil for ape scandal: How palm oil is threatening the orang-utan. Friends of the Earth Trust. Retrieved February 28 2010 from http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/oil_for_ape_full.pdf.
  5. Cocks, L. (1998). Captive orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus and Pongo abelii): Factors affecting mortality in relation to the different sexes. Retrieved from February 22, 2009 from http://www.orangutan.org.au/assets/images/publicdocs/SexDifferences.doc.
  6. Cocks, L. (2007). Factors influencing the well-being and longevity of captive female orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). International Journal of Primatology, 28(2), 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delgado, R., Jr., & van Schaik, C. P. (2000). The behavioral ecology and conservation of the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus): A tale of two islands. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9(5), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fagen, R. (2002). Primate juveniles and primate play. In M. E. Pereira & L. A. Fairbanks (Eds.), Juvenile primates: Life history, development, and behavior (pp. 182–196). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Felton, A. M., Engstron, L. M., Felton, A., & Knott, C. D. (2003). Orangutan population density, forest structure and fruit availability in hand-logged and unlogged peat swamp forests in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biological Conservation, 114(1), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galdikas, B. (1978a). Orangutan adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve: Mating and ecology. In D. A. Hamburg & E. R. McCown (Eds.), The great apes: Perspectives on human evolution (pp. 195–233). Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar
  11. Galdikas, B. (1978b). Tanjung Puting orangutan age-sex classes. Retrieved October 10, 2005 from http://www.orangutan.org/facts/agesex.php.
  12. Galdikas, B. (1985). Adult male sociality and reproductive tactics among orangutans at Tanjung Puting Borneo Indonesia. Folia Primatologica, 45(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galdikas, B. (1988). Orangutan diet, range, and activity at Tanjung Puting, Central Borneo. International Journal of Primatology, 9, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grundmann, E. (2006). Back to the wild: Will re-introduction and rehabilitation help the long-term conservation of orangutans in Indonesia? Social Sciences Information, 45(2), 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton, R., & Galdikas, B. (1994). A preliminary study of food selection by the orangutan in relation to plant quality. Primates, 35(3), 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrison, M. (2009). Orang-utan feeding behaviour in Sabangau, Central Kalimantan. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  17. Isler, K., & Thorpe, S. (2003). Gait parameters in vertical climbing of captive, rehabilitant and wild Sumatran orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus.abelii). The Journal of Experimental Biology, 206, 4081–4096.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Janson, C., & van Schaik, C. (2002). Ecological risk aversion in juvenile primates: Slow and steady wins the race. In M. Pereira (Ed.), Juvenile primates: Life history, development and behaviour (pp. 57–74). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, A. E., Knott, C. D., Pamungkas, B., Pasaribu, M., & Marshall, A. J. (2005). A survey of the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) population in and around Gunung Palung National Park, West Kalimantan, Indonesia based on nest counts. Biological Conservation, 121, 492–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Key, C., & Ross, C. (1999). Sex differences in the energy expenditure in non-human primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 266(1437), 2479–2485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maple, T. (1980). Orangutan behaviour. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  22. Morrogh-Bernard, H., Husson, S., & Mclardy, C. (2002). Orangutan data collection standardization. In Orang-utan culture workshop, San Anselmo. Retrieved December 4, 2005 from www.orangutannetwork.net/data_collection.htm.
  23. Morrogh-Bernard, H., Husson, S., Page, S. E., & Rieley, J. O. (2003). Population status of the Bornean orang-utan (Pongo pygmaeus) in the Sebangau peat swamp forest, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biological Conservation, 110(1), 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Orangutan Conservation and Reintroduction Workshop. (2002). Final report. Retrieved January 7, 2010 from http://www.cbsg.org/cbsg/workshopreports/26/orangutan_conservation_and_reintroduction_workshop_final_report_2002.pdf.
  25. Peters, H. (1995). Orangutan reintroduction? Development, use and evaluation of a new method of reintroduction. MSc thesis. Groningen University, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  26. Rijksen, H. D., & Meijaard, E. (1999). Our vanishing relative: The status of wild orang-utans at the close of the twentieth century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  27. Russon, A. (1999). Orangutans – Wizards of the rainforest. London: Robert Hale.Google Scholar
  28. Russon, A. (2002). Return of the native: Cognition and site-specific expertise in orangutan rehabilitation. International Journal of Primatology, 23(3), 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Russon, A. (2006). Acquisition of complex foraging skills in juvenile and adolescent orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus): Developmental influences. Aquatic Mammals, 32(4), 500–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Russon, A. (2009a). Orangutan rehabilitation and reintroduction. In S. A. Wich, S. S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia, & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 327–350). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Russon, A. (2009b). Geographic variation in orangutan diets. In S. A. Wich, S. S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia, & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 135–156). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Russon, A. (1998). Forest cognition in rehabilitant orangutans. In Seventeenth Congress of International Primatological Society, August 10–14. (1998). International Primatological Society. Madagascar: Antananarivo.Google Scholar
  33. Sugardjito, J. (1995). Conservation of orangutans, threats and prospects. In R. Nadler, B. Galdikas, L. Sheeran, & N. Rosen (Eds.), The neglected ape (pp. 45–49). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sugardjito, J., te Boekhorst, I. J. A., & van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1987). Ecological constraints on the grouping of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus) in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia. International Journal of Primatology, 8(1), 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sugardjito, J., & van Hooff, J. (1986). Age-sex class differences in the positional behaviour of the Sumatran orang-utan, in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Indonesia. Folia Primatologica, 47, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thorpe, S. K. S., & Crompton, R. H. (2006). Orangutan positional behavior and the nature of arboreal locomotion in Hominoidea. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131(3), 384–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Utami, S., Wich, S., Sterck, E., & van Hooff, J. (1997). Food competition between wild orangutans in large fig trees. International Journal of Primatology, 18(6), 909–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Noordwijk, M., & van Schaik, C. (2005). Development of ecological competence in Sumatran orangutans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 127(1), 79–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Schaik, C. (1999). The socioecology of fission-fusion sociality in orangutans. Primates, 40(1), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Schaik, C., & Knott, C. (2001). Geographic variation in tool use on Neesia fruits in orangutans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 11, 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Schaik, C. P., van Noordwijk, M. A., & Vogel, E. R. (2009). Ecological sex differences in wild orangutans. In S. A. Wich, S. S. Utami Atmoko, T. Mitra Setia, & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 255–268). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Yeager, C. (1997). Orangutan rehabilitation in Tanjung Puting National Park, Indonesia. Conservation Biology, 11(3), 802–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zucker, E., Dennon, M., & Maple, T. (1986). Play profiles of captive adult orangutans: A developmental perspective. Developmental Psychobiology, 19(4), 315–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristin A. Descovich
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Birute M. Galdikas
    • 4
    • 5
  • Andrew Tribe
    • 1
    • 3
  • Allan Lisle
    • 6
  • Clive J. Phillips
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Animal StudiesUniversity of QueenslandGattonAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Orangutan ProjectSouth PerthWestern Australia
  3. 3.Centre for Animal Welfare and EthicsUniversity of QueenslandGattonAustralia
  4. 4.Orangutan Foundation InternationalPangkalan BunIndonesia
  5. 5.Department of ArchaeologySimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  6. 6.School of Land, Crop and Food SciencesUniversity of QueenslandGattonAustralia

Personalised recommendations