Advertisement

International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1267–1278 | Cite as

Sperm Competition and Optimal Timing of Matings in Microcebus murinus

  • Manfred Eberle
  • Martine Perret
  • Peter M. Kappeler
Article

Abstract

Female promiscuity is common in mammals and leads to sperm competition: the sperm of ≥2 males compete for ova. Scientists understand the possible role of optimal insemination periods for male reproductive success in many species as well as the impact of monopolization of receptive females. Information from experiments combined with detailed observations from the field that allow determining the relative impacts of the elements in the same species are rare. We studied sperm competition and the role of optimal insemination periods in gray mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus), a small solitary nocturnal primate from Madagascar. We used controlled matings to identify the relative impact of both contest and scramble competition, which characterize their mating system, on paternity. Fifteen females mated with 3–6 males in quick succession. Our experiments revealed that the optimal insemination period is during early receptivity. Early but not first mating males are more likely to sire offspring. Comparison with our field data indicate that the timing of male monopolization efforts correspond with the optimal insemination period.

Keywords

mating plug mating strategy Microcebus mixed paternity primates sperm competition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Jörg U. Ganzhorn, Hans Zischler, Andreas Hapke, and Marjorie Andrès for their authorization or support of the study. We also thank Tim Birkhead for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript and Daniel Stahl for statistical advice. The Deutsches Primatenzentrum and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ka 1082/5-1,2) provided financial support.

References

  1. Andrès, M., Solignac, M., & Perret, M. (2003). Mating system in mouse lemurs: Theories and facts, using analysis of paternity. Folia Primatologica, 74, 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1989). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Animal Behaviour, 46, 861–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beach, F. A. (1976). Sexual attractivity, proceptivity, and receptivity in female mammals. Hormones and Behavior, 7, 105–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birkhead, T. R. (1998). Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. In T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller (Eds.), Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (pp. 579–622). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Birkhead, T. R. (2000). Defining and demonstrating postcopulatory female choice -again. Evolution, 54, 1057–1060.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Birkhead, T. R., Atkin, L., & Møller, A. P. (1987). Copulation behavior of birds. Behavior, 101, 101–138.Google Scholar
  7. Birkhead, T. R., & Hunter, F. M. (1990). Mechanisms of sperm competition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birkhead, T. R., & Kappeler, P. M. (2004). Post-copulatory sexual selection in birds and primates. In P. M. Kappeler & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Sexual Selection in Primates: New and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 151–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P. (1993). Sexual selection and the temporal separation of reproductive events: Sperm storage data from reptiles, birds and mammals. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 50, 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P., (Eds.) (1998). Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, C. R., & Bomberger Brown, M. (2003). Testis size increases with colony size in cliff swallows. Behavioral Ecology, 14, 569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1345–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Devine, M. C. (1975). Copulatory plugs in snakes: Enforced chastity. Science, 187, 844–845.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dixson, A. F. (1995). Sexual selection and ejaculatory frequencies in primates. Folia Primatologica, 64, 146–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixson, A. F., & Anderson, M. J. (2002). Sexual selection, seminal coagulation and copulatory plug formation in primates. Folia Primatologica, 73, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eberhard, W. G. (1996). Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Eberle, M., & Kappeler, P. M. (2002). Mouse lemurs in space and time: A test of the socioecological model. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 51, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eberle, M., & Kappeler, P. M. (2004a). Selected polyandry: Female choice and inter-sexual conflict in a small nocturnal solitary primate (Microcebus murinus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eberle, M., & Kappeler, P. M. (2004b). Sex in the dark: Determinants and consequences of mixed male mating tactics in Microcebus murinus, a small solitary nocturnal primate. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 27, 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eberle, M., & Kappeler, P. M. (2006). Family insurance: Kin selection and cooperative breeding in a solitary primate (Microcebus murinus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60, 582–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox, E. A. (2002). Female tactics to reduce sexual harassment in the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gage, A. R., & Barnard, C. J. (1996). Male crickets increase sperm number in relation to competition and female size. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 38, 349–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gillott, C. (2003). Male accessory gland secretions: Modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. Annual Review of Entomology, 48, 163–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ginsberg, J. R., & Huck, U. W. (1989). Sperm competition in mammals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 74–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ginsberg, J. R., & Rubenstein, D. I. (1990). Sperm competition and variation in zebra mating behavior. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glatston, A. R. H. (1979). Reproduction and Behaviour of the Lesser Mouse Lemur (Microcebus murinus, Miller 1777) in captivity, PhD Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  27. Gomendio, M., Harcourt, A. H., & Roldán, E. R. S. (1998). Sperm competition in mammals. In T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller (Eds.), Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (pp. 667–755). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hanken, J., & Sherman, P. W. (1981). Multiple paternity in Belding’s ground squirrel litters. Science, 212, 351–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hapke, A., Eberle, M., & Zischler, H. (2003). Isolation of new microsatellite markers and application in four species of mouse lemurs (Microcebus sp.). Molecular Ecology Notes, 3, 205–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harcourt, A. H., Harvey, P. H., Larson, S. G., & Short, R. V. (1981). Testis weight, body weight and breeding systems in primates. Nature, 293, 55–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrison, R. A. P. (1996). Capacitation mechanisms, and the role of capacitation as seen in eutherian mammals. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 8, 581–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heske, E. J., & Ostfeld, R. S. (1990). Sexual dimorphism in size relative of testes and mating systems in North American voles. Journal of Mammalogy, 71, 510–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hosken, D. (1997). Sperm competition in bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences, 264, 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huck, U. W., Tonias, B. A., & Lisk, R. D. (1989). The effectiveness of competitive male inseminations in golden hamsters, Mesocricetus auratus, depends on an interaction of mating order, time delay between males, and the time of mating relative to ovulation. Animal Behaviour, 37, 674–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hunter, R. H. F. (1995). Ovarian endocrine control of sperm progression in the fallopian tubes. Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology, 37, 85–124.Google Scholar
  36. in den Bosh, H. A. J. (1994). First record of mating plugs in lizards. Amphibia-Reptilia, 15, 89–93.Google Scholar
  37. Kappeler, P. M. (1993). Female dominance in primates and other mammals. In P. P. G. Bateson, P. H. Klopfer, & N. S. Thompson (Eds.), Perspectives in Ethology Behaviour and Evolution (pp. 143–158). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Intrasexual selection and testis size in strepsirhine primates. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kappeler, P. M. (2000). Ecologie des microcèbes. Primatologie, 3, 145–171.Google Scholar
  40. Koprowski, J. L. (1992). Removal of copulatory plugs by female tree squirrels. Journal of Mammalogy, 73, 572–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Marshall, T. C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L. E. B., & Pemperton, J. M. (1998). Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639–655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Møller, A. P. (1989). Ejaculate quality, testes size and sperm production in mammals. Functional Ecology, 3, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moreira, P. L., & Birkhead, T. R. (2003). Copulatory plugs in the Iberian rock lizard do not prevent insemination by rival males. Functional Ecology, 17, 796–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pagès-Feuillade, E. (1988). Modalites de l’occupation de l’espace et relations interindividuelles chez un prosimien nocturne malgache (Microcebus murinus). Folia Primatologica, 50, 204–220.Google Scholar
  45. Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Review, 45, 525–567.Google Scholar
  46. Parker, G. A. (1998). Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: Towards a theory base. In T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller (Eds.), Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (pp. 3–54). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Pereira, M. E., & Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Divergent systems of agonistic relationship in lemurid primates. Behaviour, 134, 225–274.Google Scholar
  48. Perret, M. (2000). Reproduction saisonnière et succès reproducteur chez un prosimien malgache, Microcebus murinus. Primatologie, 3, 45–84.Google Scholar
  49. Petter-Rousseaux, A. (1964). Reproductive physiology and behavior of the Lemuroidea. In J. Buettner-Janusch (Ed.), Evolutionary and Genetic Biology of Primates (pp. 91–132). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. Pitnick, S., & Brown, W. D. (2000). Criteria for demonstrating female sperm choice. Evolution, 54, 1052–1056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Pizzari, T., & Birkhead, T. R. (2000). Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature, 405, 787–789.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Preston, B. T., Stevenson, I. R., Pemberton, J. M., Coltman, D. W., & Wilson, K. (2003a). Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: The importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success. Proceedings of the Royal Society. London Series B-Biological Sciences, 270, 633–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Preston, B. T., Stevenson, I. R., & Wilson, K. (2003b). Soay rams target reproductive activity towards promiscuous females’ optimal insemination period. Proceedings of the Royal Society. London Series B - Biological Sciences, 270, 2073–2078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Radespiel, U., Cepok, S., Zietemann, V., & Zimmermann, E. (1998). Sex-specific usage patterns of sleeping sites in grey mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus) in northwestern Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology, 46, 77–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Radespiel, U., Dal Secco, V., Drögemüller, C., Braune, P., Labes, E., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Sexual selection, multiple mating and paternity in grey mouse lemurs, Microcebus murinus. Animal Behaviour, 63, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Radespiel, U., & Zimmermann, E. (2001). Female dominance in captive gray mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus). American Journal of Primatology, 54, 181–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reeder, D. M. (2003). The potential for cryptic female choice in primates: Behavioral, physiological, and anatomical considerations. In C. B. Jones (Ed.), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Primates: New Perspectives and Directions (pp. 255–303). OK, Norman: American Society of Primatologists.Google Scholar
  58. Say, L., Pontier, D., & Natoli, E. (1999). High variation in multiple paternity of domestic cats (Felis catus L.) in relation to environmental conditions. Proceedings of the Royal Society. London Series B - Biological Sciences, 266, 2071–2074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmid, J. (1998). Tree holes used for resting by gray mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus) in Madagascar: Insulation capacities and energetic consequences. International Journal of Primatology, 19, 797–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwagmeyer, P. L., & Foltz, D. W. (1990). Factors affecting the outcome of sperm competition in thirteen-lined ground squirrels. Animal Behaviour, 39, 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Setchell, J. M., & Kappeler, P. M. (2003). Selection in relation to sex in primates. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 33, 87–174.Google Scholar
  62. Sherman, P. W. (1989). Mate guarding as paternity insurance in Idaho ground squirrels. Nature, 338, 418–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shimmin, G. A., Jones, M., Taggart, D. A., & Temple-Smith, P. D. (1999). Sperm transport and storage in the agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis). Biology of Reproduction, 60, 1353–1359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Simmons, L. W., & Siva-Jothy, M. T. (1998). Sperm competition in insects: mechanisms and the potential for selection. In T. R. Birkhead & A. P. Møller (Eds.), Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (pp. 363–434). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  65. Strier, K. B. (1999). Faces in the Forest: The Endangered Muriqui Monkeys of Brazil. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Suarez, S. S. (1998). The oviductal sperm reservoir in mammals: Mechanisms of formation. Biology of Reproduction, 58, 1105–1107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Voss, R. (1979). Male accessory glands and the evolution of copulatory plugs in rodents. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology University of Michigan, 689, 1–27.Google Scholar
  68. Wedekind, C., Chapuisat, M., Macas, E., & Rülicke, T. (1996). Non-random fertilization in mice correlates with the MHC and something else. Heredity, 77, 400–409.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wimmer, B. (2000). Untersuchung der Paarungssysteme und Populationsstruktur von Lemuren an Coquerel’s Zwergmaki (Mirza coquereli), dem grauen Mauslemur (Microcebus murinus), dem Rotstirnmaki (Eulemur fulvus rufus) und dem Larvensifaka (Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi). PhD Thesis, Universität München.Google Scholar
  70. Wolff, J. O., & Macdonald, D. W. (2004). Promiscuous females protect their offspring. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 127–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River: NJ, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  72. Zimmermann, E. (1995). Acoustic communication in nocturnal prosimians. In L. Alterman, G. A. Doyle, & M. K. Izard (Eds.), Creatures of the Dark (pp. 311–330). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manfred Eberle
    • 1
  • Martine Perret
    • 2
  • Peter M. Kappeler
    • 3
  1. 1.Abteilung Verhaltensökologie & Soziobiologie, Deutsches PrimatenzentrumLeibnitz-Institut für PrimatenforschungGöttingenGermany
  2. 2.Département d’Ecologie et Gestion de la BiodiversitéBrunoyFrance
  3. 3.Abteilung Verhaltensökologie & Soziobiologie, Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Leibnitz-Institut für Primatenforschung, and Institut für Zoologie und AnthropologieUniversität GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations