Acoustic Niches of Siberut Primates
- 257 Downloads
The loud calls nonhuman primates use in long-distance communication have supposedly been selected for efficient information transfer in the habitat. The differential effects of scattering and reverberation and the masking effects of background noise predict that loud calls produced in rain forest habitats should be low-pitched and whistle-like with low-frequency modulation. Callers may also use particular calling posts or times of day with reduced background noise to increase the efficacy of sound transmission. We studied the loud calls of the 4 sympatric primate species on Siberut Island. Only Kloss gibbons (Hylobates klossii) fulfilled the predictions regarding both the structure and use of calls. Though the other 3 species —Mentawai macaques (Macaca siberu), pig-tailed langurs (Simias concolor), and Mentawai leaf monkeys (Presbytis potenziani)— also concentrated their main energies in the spectral window with the lowest background noise, their calls were not adapted to long-range transmission. All 4 species produced loud calls exclusively no lower than 18 m above ground, but food abundance and shelter in the canopy may also be factors. Though all 4 species produced the majority of loud calls in the morning, it was not the only time of day with reduced background noise. We suggest that phylogenetic inheritance may better explain the structure of calls than adaptation to the habitat. In sum, the observed usage of spectral and temporal niches is not solely an adaptation to the sound profile of the habitat, though it clearly improves their transmission.
Keywordscommunication loud calls Mentawai primates signal propagation
We thank the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) for financial support; the Siberut Conservation Program (SCP); and Muhammad Agil, Department of International Affairs, for logistical support, and Christophe Abegg and Thomas Ziegler for valuable assistance.
- Bradbury, J. W., & Vehrencamp, S. L. (1998). Principles of Acoustic Communication. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
- Brown, C. H., & Gomez, R. (1992). Functional design features in primate vocal signals: The acoustic habitat and sound distortion. In T. Nishida, W. C. McGrew, & P. Marler (Eds.) Topics of Primatology (pp. 177–198). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
- Brown, C. H., & Waser, P. M. (1988). Environmental influences on the structure of primate vocalizations. In D. Todt, P. Goedeking, & D. Symmes (Eds.) Primate vocal communication (pp. 51–68). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Forrest, T. G. (1994). From sender to receiver: Propagation and environmental effects on acoustic signals. American Zoologist, 34, 644–654.Google Scholar
- Waltert, M., Abegg, C., Ziegler, T., Hadi, H., Priata, D., & Hodges, K. (in press). Abundance and community structure of Mentawai primates in the Peleonan forest, North Siberut. Oryx.Google Scholar
- Waser, P. M., & Waser, M. S. (1977). Experimental studies of primate vocalisation: specializations for long-distance propagation. Tierphysiologie, 43, 239–263.Google Scholar