International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 973–996 | Cite as

A Salience Theory of Learning and Behavior: With Perspectives on Neurobiology and Cognition

  • Duane M. Rumbaugh
  • James E. King
  • Michael J. Beran
  • David A. Washburn
  • Kristy L. Gould
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Traditional behaviorists have described behaviors fundamentally as responses to stimuli or, perhaps more liberally, as behaviors under the control of discriminative stimuli or contexts. They have held responses or behaviors to be established, strengthened, sustained, and inhibited or extinguished by contingent events: notably reinforcers, punishers, or the absence of either. In addition, they believed reinforcement acts on the response, the behavior, not on the organism. Here, and in support of Hebb’s view, we advance a contrarian view. A key principle of our framework is that species’ brains are uniquely designed to perceive and to relate stimulus events that are contiguous, salient, and relevant to adaptation. In accordance with what we here view as the constructive biases of species’ brains, stimuli are differentially organized into amalgams that reflect an exchange of salience and response-eliciting properties of component units, which are then integrated to form a basis of knowledge about the organism and its ecological niche. One can then base adaptation on overarching principles and rules, not just on simple associations. Species may create emergent behaviors with no history of specific training, and even new capacities, to service adaptation to both familiar and novel challenges.

Keywords

adaptation amalgam behaviorism conditioning constructive bias in brain function contiguity emergents habit reinforcement reward salience 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Grants HD06016 and HD-38051 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development supported preparation of this manuscript. Institutional support from the Great Ape Trust of Iowa and from the College of Arts and Sciences of Georgia State University also is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Professor Carl Halgren for his several helpful suggestions during preparation of the article.

References

  1. Antonov, I., Antonova, I., Kandel, E. R., & Hawkins, R. D. (2003). Activity-dependent presynaptic facilitation and Hebbian LTP are both required and interact during classical conditioning in Aplysia. Neuron, 37, 135–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barr, R., Marrott, H., & Rovee-Collier, C. (2003). The role of sensory preconditioning in memory retrieval by preverbal infants. Learning and Behavior, 31, 111–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1961). The misbehavior of organisms. American Psychologist, 16, 681–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brembs, B., Lorenzetti, F. D., Reyes, F. D., Baxter, D. A., & Byme, J. H. (2002). Operant reward learning in Aplysia: Neuronal correlates and mechanisms. Science, 296, 1706–1710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. M. (1968). Auto-shaping the pigeon’s peck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson, N. R. (2004). Physiology of behavior (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  7. Collier, G. (2005). A functional analysis of feeding. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 35, 63–103.Google Scholar
  8. Cuevas, K., Rovee-Collier, C., & Learmonth, A. E. (2006). Infants form associations between memory representations of stimuli that are absent. Psychological Science, 17, 543–549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Domjan, M. (2003). The principles of learning and behavior (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth-Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  10. Domjan, M. (2005). Pavlovian conditioning: A functional perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 179–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gentner, D. (2003). Why we’re so smart. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind (pp. 195–235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gottlieb, G. (1963). A naturalistic study of imprinting in wood ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos). Behaviour, 18, 205–225.Google Scholar
  13. Gurden, H., Takita, M., & Jay, T. M. (2000). Essential role of D1 but not D2 receptor s in the NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation at hippocampal-prefrontal cortex synapses in vivo. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, RC106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gurden, H., Tassin, J. P., & Jay, T. M. (1999). Integrity of the meso-cortical dopaminergic system is necessary for complete expression of in vivo hippocampal-prefrontal cortex long-term potentiation. Neuroscience, 94, 1019–1027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harlow, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hawkins, R. D., Clark, G. A., & Kandel, E. R. (2006). Operant conditioning of gill withdrawal in Aplysia. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 2443–2448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neurophysiological theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  18. Hillix, W. A., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (2004). Animal bodies, human minds: Ape, dolphin, and parrot language skills. New York: Klüwer/Academic Press.Google Scholar
  19. Immelmann, K. (1972). Sexual and other long-term aspects of imprinting. In D. S. Lehrman, R. A. Hinde, & E. Shaw (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (vol. 4, pp. 147–174). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kelley, A. E., Smith-Roe, S. L., & Holahan, M. R. (1997). Response-reinforcement learning is dependent on N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor activation in the nucleus accumbens core. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 12174–12179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King, D. L. (2001). Grouping and assimilation in perception, memory, and conditioning. Review of General Psychology, 5, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Köhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  23. Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2006). An introduction to brain and behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahometa, M. J., & Domjan, M. (2005). Classical conditioning increases reproductive success in Japanese quail, Coturnix japonica. Animal Behavior, 69, 983–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marx, M. H., & Hillix, W. A. (1979). Systems and theories in psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  27. Mason, W. A. (2002). The natural history of primate development. In D. J. Lewkowicsz & R. Lickliter (Eds.), Conceptions of development (pp. 105–134). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  28. Matsuzawa, T. (2001). Primate foundations of human intelligence: A view of tool use in nonhuman primates and fossil hominids. In T. Matsuzawa (Ed.), Primate origins of human cognition and behavior (pp. 557–574). Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Mirenowicz, J., & Schultz, W. (1994). Importance of unpredictability for reward responses in primate dopamine neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 72, 1024–1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mirenowicz, J., & Schultz, W. (1996). Preferential activation of mid-brain dopamine neurons by appetitive rather than aversive stimuli. Nature, 379, 449–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murphy, G. G., & Glanzman, D. L. (1997). Mediation of classical conditioning in Aplysia californica by long-term potentiation of sensorimotor synapse. Science, 278, 467–471.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variation in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  33. Rosenkranz, J. A., & Grace, A. A. (1999). Modulation of basolateral amygdala neuronal firing and afferent drive by dopamine receptor activation in vivo. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 11027–11039.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rumbaugh, D. M. (1997). The psychology of Harry F. Harlow: A bridge from radical to rational behaviorism. Philosophical Psychology, 10, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rumbaugh, D. M. (2002). Emergents and rational behaviorism. Eye on Psi Chi, 6, 8–14.Google Scholar
  36. Rumbaugh, D. M., & Washburn, D. A. (2003). Intelligence of apes and other rational beings. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rumbaugh, D. M., Washburn, D. A., & Hillix, W. A. (1996). Respondents, operants, and emergents: Toward an integrated perspective on behavior. In K. Pribram & J. King (Eds.), Learning as a self-organizing process (pp. 57–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Murphy, J., Sevcik, R. A., Brakke, K. E., Williams, S. L., Rumbaugh, D. M., & Bates, E. (1993). Language comprehension in ape and child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 233, 58 no. 3/4, 1–125.Google Scholar
  39. Sternberg, R. J., & Preiss, D. D. (Eds.) (2005). Intelligence and technology: The impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Sutherland, N. S., & Mackintosh, N. J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tancin, V., Kraetzl, W.-D., Schams, D., Bruckmaier, R. M. (2001). The effect of conditioning to suckling, milking and of calf presence on the release of oxytocin in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 72, 235–246.Google Scholar
  42. von Uexküll, J. (1934/1957). A stroll through the world of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 5–80). New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  43. Washburn, D. A. (Ed.) (2006). Primate perspectives on behavior and cognition. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
  44. West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Duane M. Rumbaugh
    • 1
    • 2
  • James E. King
    • 3
  • Michael J. Beran
    • 2
  • David A. Washburn
    • 2
    • 4
  • Kristy L. Gould
    • 5
  1. 1.Great Ape Trust of IowaDes MoinesUSA
  2. 2.Language Research CenterGeorgia State UniversityDecaturUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyLuther CollegeDecorahUSA

Personalised recommendations