International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 971–982 | Cite as

Distribution and Conservation of Nycticebus bengalensis in Northeastern India

  • Sindhu RadhakrishnaEmail author
  • Arup Ballav Goswami
  • Anindya Sinha

We assessed the distribution and conservation status of Bengal slow lorises in Assam and Meghalaya in northeastern India. We surveyed forest reserves, plantations, tea estates, and areas bordering forests in 10 districts of the 2 states and sighted slow lorises in only 4 districts in Assam. Disturbances caused by tree felling, road kills by speeding vehicles, and trapping and hunting are the chief survival threats to the species. We emphasize immediate implementation of conservation measures to ensure the future of the species and recommend additional population surveys to define the distributional extent of Bengal slow lorises.


conservation distribution forest fragmentation India Nycticebus bengalensis relative abundance threats 



The Margot Marsh Biodiversity Foundation—Conservation International (MMBF), Wildlife Conservation Society—India Program (WCS-IP), and the Centre for Wildlife Studies, Bangalore, India funded the study. We thank Anthony Rylands and Ella Outlaw of MMBF and Ullas Karanth and Samba Kumar of WCS-IP for their valuable advice and support throughout the project. We thank the Chief Conservator of Forests (CCF Wildlife) of the Assam and Meghalaya Forest Departments for permission to conduct the survey and the respective forest officials of both states for their cooperation and aid in our work. Raju Kumar Nath, Puspo Swargiari, J. Jugen, James Marak, and Hari Chetry rendered great assistance in the field. Many friends, family members, and wildlife researchers helped us in our preparations for the study, during the actual survey, and through data analysis; our sincere thanks to Prabal Sarkar, Buddhin Hazarika, the Pygmy Hog Conservation Breeding Programme in Guwahati, particularly Gautam Narayan, Nandita Hazarika, and Dr Parag Deka, P. C. Bhattacharjee, Dilip Chetry, Ajay Sarmah, Narayan Sharma, Anjan Talukdar, Kaberi Kar Gupta, Anwaruddin Choudhury, Padmeshwar Gogoi, K. Haridasan, Sham Davande, Arundati Das, Jagdish Krishnaswamy, Anil Govind, Jobi Chacko, Kakoli Mukhopadhyay, Geeta Balagopal, N. Balagopal, Hemalatha Radhakrishna, N. Radhakrishna Pillai, Sushila Pillai, Govinda Pillai, M. D. Madhusudan, Divya Mudappa, T. R. Shankar Raman, and Aarathi Krishnan. We also express our thanks to 2 anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly enhanced the quality of the manuscript.


  1. Barrett, E. (1984). The Ecology of Some Nocturnal, Arboreal Mammals in the Rainforests of Peninsular Malaysia. Doctoral Thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Brandon-Jones D., Eudey, A. A., Geissmann, T., Groves, C. P., Melnick, D. J., Morales, J. C., Shekelle, M., and Stewart C. B. (2004). Asian primate classification. Int. J. Primatol. 25: 97–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., and Laake, J. L. (1980). Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildlife Monogr. 72: 1–202.Google Scholar
  4. Choudhury, A. U. (1992). The slow loris (Nycticebus coucang) in northeast India. Primate Rep. 34: 77–83.Google Scholar
  5. Choudhury, A. U. (2001). Primates in northeast India: An overview of their distribution and conservation status. In Gupta, A. K. (ed.), ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas, Non-Human Primates of India, Vol. 1, pp. 92–101.Google Scholar
  6. Forest Survey of India (1999). State of Forest Report. Forest Survey of India, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
  7. Groves, C. P. (2001). Primate Taxonomy, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  8. IUCN (1996). 1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals, IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  9. IUCN (2004). 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, IUCN—The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  10. Johns, A. D. (1986). Effects of selective logging on the behavioural ecology of west Malaysian primates. Ecology 67: 684–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marsh, C. W., Johns, A. D., and Ayres, J. M. (1987). Effects of habitat disturbances on rainforest primates. In Marsh, C. W., and Mittermeier, R. (ed.), Primate Conservation in the Tropical Rainforest, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 83–107.Google Scholar
  12. Nekaris, K., and Jayewardene, J. (2003). Pilot study and conservation status of the slender loris (Loris tardigradus and Loris lydekkerianus) in Sri Lanka. Prim. Conserv. 19: 83–90.Google Scholar
  13. Nekaris, K., and Jayewardene, J. (2004). Survey of the slender loris (Primates, Lorisidae Gray, 1821: Loris tardigradus Linnaeus, 1758 and Loris lydekkerianus Cabrera, 1908) in Sri Lanka. J. Zool., Lond. 262: 327–338.Google Scholar
  14. Rawat, G. S., Desai, A., Somanathan, H., and Wikramanayake, E. D. (2001). Brahmaputra Valley semi-evergreen forests. indo_malayan.cfm (Accessed August 1, 2004).Google Scholar
  15. Rawat, G. S., and Wikramanayake, E. D. (2001). Meghalaya subtropical forests. (Accessed August 1, 2004).Google Scholar
  16. Singh, M., Lindburg, D. G., Udhayan, A., Kumar, M. A., and Kumara, H. N. (1999). Status survey of slender loris Loris tardigradus lydekkerianus in Dindigul, Tamil Nadu, India. Oryx 33: 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singh, M., Kumar, M. A., Kumara, H. N., and Mohnot, S. M. (2000). Distribution and conservation of slender lorises (Loris tardigradus lydekkerianus) in southern Andhra Pradesh, South India. Int. J. Primatol. 21: 721–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith, R. J., and Jungers, W. L. (1997). Body mass in comparative primatology. J. Hum. Evol 32: 523–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Srivastava, A. (1999). Primates of Northeast India, Megadiversity Press, Bikaner, India.Google Scholar
  20. Walsh, P. D., and White L. J. T. (1999). What it will take to monitor forest elephant populations. Cons. Biol. 13: 1194–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wiens, F. (1995). Verhaltensbeobachtungen am Plumplori, Nycticebus coucang (Primates: Lorisidae), im Freiland. Diploma Thesis, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.Google Scholar
  22. Wiens, F. (2002). Behavior and Ecology of Wild Slow Lorises (Nycticebus coucang): Social organization infant care system, and diet. Thesis, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.Google Scholar
  23. Wiens, F., and Zitzmann, A. (2003). Social structure of the solitary slow loris Nycticebus coucang (Lorisidae). J. Zool. 261: 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sindhu Radhakrishna
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Arup Ballav Goswami
    • 3
  • Anindya Sinha
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.National Institute of Advanced StudiesBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Wildlife Conservation SocietyBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Honorary Wildlife WardenAssamIndia
  4. 4.Nature Conservation FoundationMysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations