International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 1175–1187 | Cite as

Diet of Southern Muriquis in Continuous Brazilian Atlantic Forest

  • Mauricio TalebiEmail author
  • Alexandre Bastos
  • P. C. Lee


We systematically collected data on feeding behavior for one group of 33–39 southern muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides) in Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho (PECB), São Paulo State, Brazil (37,432.45 ha of continuous Atlantic Forest), between January and December 1995. We determined food item consumption from instantaneous scans of behavior. Fruits were the most eaten food items in all 12 mo (40–80% of scan in every mo, average = 71.3%). Muriquis ate young leaves more than mature leaves or flowers. Our results are consistent with previous findings at the same and neighboring forest sites that southern muriquis have a consistently frugivorous diet when inhabiting less disturbed habitats, but contrast with previous observations on oppportunistic frugivory in muriqui populations inhabiting fragmented forests. Sustained high levels of frugivory probably result from year-round availability of fruit within large continuous forests.


Brachyteles arachnoides muriquis food availability frugivory Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altmann, J. (1974). “Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods.” Behaviour 49: 227–267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Rylands, A. B., Konstant, W. R., Flick, P., Pilgrim, J., Oldfield, S., Magin, G., and Hilton-Taylor, C. (2002). “Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity.”Conserv. Biol.16(4): 909–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Custódio-Filho, A., Negreiros, O. C., Dias, A. C., and Franco, G. A. D. C. (1992). “Composiçao florística do estrato arbóreo do Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho, SP.”Segundo Congresso Nacional de Essências Nativas 1: 184–191.Google Scholar
  4. de Carvalho, O. J., Ferrari, S. F., and Strier, K. B. (2004). “Diet of a group of southern muriquis.” Primates 45(3): 201–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. de Carvalho, O. J. (1996). Dieta, padrões de atividade e de agrupamento do mono-carvoeiro (Brachyteles arachnoides) no Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho—SP. Masther's Thesis, Dept de Genética. Belém—Pará, Universidade Federal de Belém do Pará.Google Scholar
  6. de Moraes, P. L. R. (1992). “Espécies utilizadas na alimentação do mono-carvoeiro (Brachyteles arachnoides—E GEOFFROY 1806) no Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho.” Segundo Congresso Nacional de Essências Nativas 1: 1206–1208.Google Scholar
  7. de Moraes, P. L. R., Carvalho Jr, O., and Strier, K. B. (1998). “Population variation in patch and party size in muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides).” Int. J. Primat. 19(2): 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Domingues, E. N., and Silva, D. A. (1988). “Geomorfologia do Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho—SP.” Bol. Tec. Inst. Flor. 42: 7–105.Google Scholar
  9. IUCN, S. (1998). Population and Habitat Viability Assessment (PHVA) for the Muriqui (Brachyteles arachnoides. Belo Horizonte—Brasil.Google Scholar
  10. Lambert, J. E. (1998). “Primate digestion: interactions among anatomy, physiology and feeding ecology.” Evol. Anthr. 7(1): 08–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, P. C., Majluf, P., and Gordon, I. J. (1991). “Growth, weaning and maternal investment from a comparative perspective.” J. Zool. Lond. 225: 99–114.Google Scholar
  12. Milton, K. (1981). “Food choice and digestive strategies of two sympatric primate species.” Am. Nat. 117(4): 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Milton, K. (1984). The role of food-processing factors in primate food choice. In Rodman, P. S., and Cant, J. G. H. (eds.), Adaptations for foraging in Nonhuman primates: Contributions to an organismal biology of prosimians, monkeys and apes. New York, Columbia University Press: pp. 249–279.Google Scholar
  14. Negreiros, O. C., Custodio-Filho, A., Dias, A. C., Franco, G. A. D. C., Couto, H. T. Z., Vieira, M. G. L., and Moura Netto, B. V. (1995). “Analise estrutural de um trecho de floresta pluvial tropical, Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho, Nucleo de Sete Barras (SP–Brasil).” Bol. Tec. Inst. Flor. 7(1): 1–33.Google Scholar
  15. Oates, J. F. (1977). The Guereza and man. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pacagnella, S. (1985). Censo de População de Monos-Carvoeiro (Brachyteles arachnoides) no Parque Estadual de Carlos Botelho, Estado de São Paulo. A Primatologia no Brasil 3. Biodiversitas., F. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais: 225–234.Google Scholar
  17. Petroni, L. (1993). Aspectos da ecologia e comportamento do mono-carvoeiro (Brachyteles arachnoides—E. Geoffroy, 1806—Cebidae, Primates) na Fazenda Intervales, Serra de Paranapiacaba, São Paulo. Masther's Thesis. Zoologia. Porto Alegre, Pontíficia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul: 78.Google Scholar
  18. Petroni, L. (2000). Caracterização da área de uso e dieta do mono-carvoeiro (Brachyteles arachnoides, Cebidae-Primates) na Mata Atlantica, Serra de Paranapiacaba, SP. Doctorate Thesis, Departamento de Zoologia. São Paulo—SP, Universidade de São Paulo: 166.Google Scholar
  19. Radambrasil (1983). Projeto Radambrasil: Levantamento de recursos naturais., IBGE - Brasil. Vol. 32.Google Scholar
  20. Richard, A. (Ed). (1985). Primates in nature. New York, W. H. Freeman and Comp.Google Scholar
  21. Rosenberger, A., and Strier, K. (1989). “Adaptive Radiation of the Ateline Primates.” J. Hum. Evol. 18(7): 717–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stevenson, P. R., Quinones, M. J., and Ahumada, J. A. (2000). “Influence of fruit availability on ecological overlap among four neotropical primates at Tinigua National Park, Colombia.” Biotropica 32(3): 533–544.Google Scholar
  23. Strier, K. B. (1986). The behavior and ecology of the woolly spider monkey, or muriqui: (Brachyteles arachnoides, E. Geoffroy 1806). Cambridge, Massachussets, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Anthropology. Harvard University: 352.Google Scholar
  24. Strier, K. B. (1987). “Socioecology of wooly spider monkeys, or muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides).” Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 72(2): 259 (000739).Google Scholar
  25. Strier, K. B. (1991). “Diet in One Group of Woolly Spider Monkeys, or Muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides).” Am. J. Primatol. 23(2): 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Talebi, M. (2001). Nutritional Factors affecting food choice in wild southern muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides) in southeastern Brazil. The XVIIIth Congress of the International Primatological Society—Primates in the New Millenium, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, IPS.Google Scholar
  27. Talebi, M. (2003). “Dietary strategies and digestive efficiency of the southern muriqui (Brachyteles arachnoides).” Am. J. Phys. Anthrop.(Supl. 36): 206.Google Scholar
  28. UNESCO (1999). Convention concerning the protection of the World cultural and natural heritage. Committee, W. H. Marrakech—Morocco, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organizations: 118.Google Scholar
  29. Van Roosmalen, M. G. M. (1980). Habitat Preferences, Diet, Feeding Strategy amd Social Organization of the Black Spider Monkey (Ateles paniscus paniscus—Linnaeus 1758) in Surinam, Lanbouwhogeschool (Wageningen): 175.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mauricio Talebi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alexandre Bastos
    • 2
    • 3
  • P. C. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological AnthropologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Pró-Muriqui AssociationParque Estadual Carlos BotelhoSão Miguel ArcanjoBrasil
  3. 3.Department of Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary MedicineUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations