International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 1077–1092 | Cite as

Vocal Communication in a Fission-Fusion Society: Do Spider Monkeys Stay in Touch With Close Associates?

Article

Abstract

In fission-fusion societies, in which animals from the same group may spend long periods of time apart from each other, individuals could use long-distance vocalizations to maintain contact with others. This could be achieved with vocalizations that simply carried information about the caller's identity and location. I explored this possibility using observations and experiments from a 3-year field study of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) in Punta Laguna, México, analyzing the use of the species' most frequent vocalization, the whinny. By following 2 subgroups simultaneously, I found that subgroups that were within the active space of the whinny approached each other more often than subgroups that were farther apart. Individual adults in these subgroups also emitted more whinnies when they were within hearing range of another subgroup than when farther apart. I used a paired playback design to determine whether whinnies could influence the behavior of close associates as opposed to nonassociated individuals. Although nonassociates were as likely as close associates to respond vocally to playbacks of whinnies, only a close associate ever approached the speaker. Collectively, the results suggest that whinnies are used by spider monkeys to achieve flexibility in spacing while maintaining specific social relationships.

Keywords

fission-fusion contact calls spider monkeys playback experiments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boinski, S. (1991). The coordination of spatial position: a field study of the vocal behavior of adult female squirrel monkeys. Anim. Behav. 41: 89–102.Google Scholar
  2. Butterfield, P. A. (1970). The pair bond in the zebra finch. In Social behavior in birds and mammals. New York, Academic Press, Crook, J. H. (Ed.).Google Scholar
  3. Chapman, C. A. (1990). Association patterns of spider monkeys: the influence of ecology and sex on social organization. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman, C. A., and Lefebvre, L. (1990). Manipulating foraging group size: spider monkey food calls at fruiting trees. Anim. Behav. 39: 891–896.Google Scholar
  5. Chapman, C. A., and Weary, D. M. (1990). Variability in spider monkey's vocalizations may provide basis for individual recognition. Am. J. Primatol. 22: 279–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dittus, W. P. J. (1988). An analysis of toque macaque cohesion calls from an ecological perspective. In Primate vocal communication. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Todt, et al (eds.).Google Scholar
  7. Eisenberg, J. F. (1976). Communication mechanisms and social integration in the black spider monkey, Ateles fusciceps robustus, and related species. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 213.Google Scholar
  8. Goodall, J. (1968). The behavior of free-living chimpanzees in the Gombe stream Reserve. Anim. Behav. Monographs 1: 165–311.Google Scholar
  9. Green, S. (1975). Variation of vocal pattern with social situation in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata): a field study. In Primate Behavior. New York: Academic Press, LA Rosenblum (ed.).Google Scholar
  10. Hauser, M. D. (1996). The Evolution of Communication. MIT Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  11. Heinrich, B., and Marzluff, J. M. (1991). Do common ravens yell because they want to attract others? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kummer, H. (1968). Social organization of hamadryas baboons. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Kruuk, H. (1972). The spotted hyena: a study of predation and social behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. McComb, K., Moss, C., Sayialel, S., and Baker, L. (2000). Unusually extensive networks of vocal recognition in African elephants. Anim. Behav. 59: 1103–1109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitani, J. C. (1996). Comparative studies of African ape vocal Behavior. In Great Ape Societies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., and Nishida, T. (eds.).Google Scholar
  16. Mitani, J. C., and Nishida, T. (1993). Contexts and social correlates of long distance calling by male chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 45: 735–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Poole, J. H., Payne, K., Langbauer, W. R. Jr., and Moss C. (1988). The social contexts of some very low frequency calls of African elephants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ramos-Fernández, G. (2001). Patterns of association, feeding competition and vocal communication in spider monkeys, Ateles geoffroyi. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  19. Ramos-Fernández, G., and Ayala-Orozco, B. (2002). Population size and habitat use of spider monkeys in Punta Laguna, Mexico. In: Primates in Fragments: Ecology and Conservation. Kluwer/Plenum Press, New York, Marsh L. K. (eds.).Google Scholar
  20. Robinson, J. G. (1982). Vocal systems regulating within-group spacing. In Primate Communication, Cambridge University Press, Snowdon, C. T., Brown, C. H., and Petersen M. (eds.), Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. van Roosmalen, M. G. M., and Klein, L. L. (1987). The spider monkeys, Genus Ateles. In Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates. World Wide Fund, Washington, Mittermeier R. A., and Rylands A. B. (eds.).Google Scholar
  22. Smith, W. J. (1977). The Behavior of Communicating. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Smolker, R., Richards, A. F., Connor, R. C., and Pepper, J. W. (1992). Sex differences in patterns of association among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behavior 123: 38–29.Google Scholar
  24. Symington, M. M. (1987). Ecological and social correlates of party size in the black spider monkey, Ateles paniscus chamek. PhD. thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  25. Teixidor, P., and Byrne, R. W. (1997). Can spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) discriminate vocalizations of familiar individuals and strangers? Folia Primatol. 68: 254–264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Teixidor, P., and Byrne, R. W. (1999). The ‘whinny’ of spider monkeys: individual recognition before situational meaning. Behavior 136: 279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wahlberg, M., Ramos-Fernández, G., Ugarte, F., Møhl, B., Rasch, M. (2002). Recording spider monkeys with a microphone array. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 (5) Pt.2: 2400.Google Scholar
  28. Whitehead, H. 1999. Testing association patterns of social animals. Anim. Behav. 57: 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilkinson, G. S., and Boughman, J. W. (1998). Social calls coordinate foraging in greater spear-nosed bats. Anim. Behav. 55: 337–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology DepartmentUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia
  2. 2.Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional (CIIDIR)Instituto Politécnico Nacional-Unidad OaxacaOaxacaMéxico

Personalised recommendations