Advertisement

The Knowledge Networks in a Makerspace: the Topologies of Collaboration

  • Marco BragaEmail author
  • Gustavo Guttmann
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

The introduction of makerspaces in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math education caused new challenges in research: learning in this innovative environment and the exchange of knowledge. The collaboration is the essence of most parts of activities in these spaces, and the exchange of information is the way to learning. It is usual to analyze the collaboration only among human actors. It is also usual to forget the role of non-human actors in this process. This paper analyzes the role of human and non-human actors in a maker activity. The teachers and researchers proposed a challenge to High School students in Brazil where the students were instructed to build a bag to transport some screws. During the process, some videos were made and later tools of video analyses and Social Network Analyses were used to produce topologies of information exchanges among the teacher, students, and artifacts. The results showed that both artifacts and environment layout play an important role in this process.

Keywords

Actor–network theory Innovative learning environments Knowledge networks Makerspace 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by CNPq—Brazil.

References

  1. Beauchamp, G. & Kennewell, S. (2010). Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers and Education, 54(3), 759–766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezemer, J. & Mavers, D. (2011). Multimodal transcription as academic practice: A social semiotic perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 191–206.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.563616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biermeier, M. A. (2015). Inspired by Reggio Emilia: Emergent curriculum in relationship-driven learning environments| NAEYC. Retrieved August 29, 2018, from https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/yc/nov2015/emergent-curriculum
  4. Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network: The case of electric vehicle. In M. Callon, J. Law, & A. Rip (Eds.), Mapping the dynamic of science and technology (pp. 19–34). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Callon, M. (1999). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The sciences studies reader (pp. 67–83). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Carlino, G. (2001). Knowledge spillover: Citie’s role in the new economy. Business Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia), 7(Q4), 17–26. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5051709_Knowledge_spillovers_Cities%27_role_in_the_new_economy.
  7. Derry, S., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., ... Sherin, B. L. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology and Ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884.
  8. Goldman-segall, R. (1993). Interpreting video data: Introducing a “significance measure” to layer descriptions. Journal for Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(3), 261–282.Google Scholar
  9. González F. & Váttimo, S. (2012). Processos de Inteligencia Colectiva y Colaborativa en el Marco de Tecnologías WEB 2.0: Conceptos, Problemas y Aplicaciones [The process of collective intelligence in technology point WEB 2.0: Concepts, problems, and applications]. Anuario de Investigaciones, XIX, 273–281.Google Scholar
  10. Jordan, B. & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Levy, P. (1990). Les technologies de L’inteligence: Le avenir de la Pensée à l’ère Informatique [The technologies of collective intelligence: The future of thought in the computer age]. Paris, France: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  14. Levy, P. (1999). Collective intelligence: Mankind’s emergency world in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA, USA: Perseu.Google Scholar
  15. Martinez, S. L. & Stager, G. S. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.Google Scholar
  16. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  17. Sailor, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K. & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological needs satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sennet, R. (2008). The crafstsman. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Try engineering. Design and Build a Better Candy Bag (n.d.). Retrieved from Try engineering website: http://tryengineering.org/lesson-plans/design-and-build-better-candy-bag.
  20. Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEFET/RJ-NAMELAB New Learning Environments and Media LabRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations