Reading Mathematics Text: a Study of Two Empirical Readings
This paper explores different ways in which mathematics students read a section of a prescribed mathematics textbook. In this case, the students are mathematics teachers learning new mathematics in a self-study calculus course. Two students were video-taped, while they studied a prescribed portion of the textbook. The reading styles of these two empirical readers are analysed according to how they exploit opportunities for learning from the textbook, how they inject productive knowledge such as prior knowledge, from outside the textbook, into their reading and how they make connections between different objects in the textbook. Their reading styles are compared to that of a hypothetical ‘implied’ reader. This implied reader engages with the text in a fruitful manner. The analyses are used as a platform from which to highlight productive and less productive ways for reading to learn mathematics.
KeywordsEmpirical reader Implied reader Reading mathematics Self-study Use of mathematics textbooks
This work is based on research supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa: UID Number 85685.
- Dietiker, L., & Brakoniecki, A. (2014). Reading geometrically: The negotiation of the expected meaning of diagrams in geometry textbooks. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Mathematics Textbook Research and Development (ICMT-2014) (pp. 191–196). Southampton, UK: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, Canada: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
- Gueudet, G., Pepin, B., & Trouche, L. (2012). From text to “lived” resources: Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Kilpatrick, J. (2014). From clay tablets to computer tablet: The evolution of school mathematics textbooks. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on mathematics textbook research and development (ICMT-2014) (pp. 3–12). Southampton, UK: University of Southampton.Google Scholar
- Leshota, M. (2015). Investigating the relationship between the affordances of the prescribed textbook and teachers’ pedagogical design capacity (PDC), and their mediation of the object of learning . (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/handle/10539/18211.
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Rezat, S. (2008). Learning mathematics with textbooks. In O. Figueras, L. Cortina, S. Alatorre, T. Rojano, & A. Sepulveda (Eds.), Proceedings of 32nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education and PME-NA XXX (Vol. 4, pp. 177–184). Morelia, Mexico: PME.Google Scholar
- Rezat, S., & Straesser, R. (2014). Mathematics textbooks and how they are used. In P. Andrews & T. Rowland (Eds.), MasterClass in mathematics education: International perspectives on teaching and learning (pp. 51–62). London & New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Sierpinska, A. (1997). Formats of interaction and model readers. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(2), 3–12.Google Scholar
- Thomas, G. B., Weir, M. D., & Hass, J. R. (2014). Thomas’ calculus: Early transcendentals (12th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Yang, K.-L. & Li, J.-L. (2016). A framework for assessing reading comprehension of geometric construction texts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Google Scholar