Advertisement

Parental Scaffolding in Mathematics Homework Among Malaysian Private Preschoolers: a Case Study

  • Diana-Lea Baranovich
  • Pei-Chin Fong
  • Fonny Hutagalung
Article

Abstract

The study aims to have a better understanding on the parental scaffolding in mathematics homework among preschoolers in the Malaysian context. This is achieved by exploring to what extent Malaysian parents provide scaffolding to their preschoolers in mathematics homework interactions. Investigations about the strategies employed by the parents during scaffolding and non-scaffolding interactions were carried out. Three mothers, with different parenting styles and education levels, and their preschoolers were observed and interviewed. In general, the occurrences of contingency, fading and transfer of responsibility were found to be scarce. Diagnostic and intervention strategies were also analysed and discussed.

Keywords

Scaffolding Contingency strategies Malaysian preschoolers Mathematics homework 

References

  1. Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 33–52.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, S. (2007). A Parent’s perspective on homework. Encounters, 20(4), 24–29.Google Scholar
  3. Bibok, M. B., Carpendale, J. I., & Müller, U. (2009). Parental scaffolding and the development of executive function. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2009(123), 17–34.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 21–34). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, A. & Pike, A. (2012). Maternal scaffolding behavior: Links with parenting style and maternal education. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 543–551.Google Scholar
  6. Charlesworth, R. (2005). Experiences in math for young children (5th ed.). New York, NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
  7. Church, E. B. (2010). Little scholars. Scholastic Parent & Child, 18(2), 108–108.Google Scholar
  8. Clements, D. H. & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development-where culture and cognition create each other. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–161). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987 -2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1–62.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, H., & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143–153.Google Scholar
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Curriculum Development Division. (2008). Early childhood care and education policy implementation review 2007. Malaysia: Ministry of Education Malaysia.Google Scholar
  14. Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2004). Education psychology: Windows on classrooms (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson.Google Scholar
  15. Elicker, J. (1995). A knitting tale: Reflections on scaffolding. Childhood Education, 72(1), 29–32.Google Scholar
  16. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Bassler, O. C., & Burow, R. (1995). Parents’ reported involvement in students’ homework: Strategies and practices. The Elementary School Journal, 95(5), 435–450.Google Scholar
  17. Hyde, J. S., Else-Quest, N. M., Alibali, M. W., Knuth, E., & Romberg, T. (2006). Mathematics in the home: Homework practices and mother-child interactions doing mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(2), 136–152.Google Scholar
  18. Kermani, H., & Brenner, M. E. (2000). Maternal scaffolding in the child’s zone of proximal development across tasks: Cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15(1), 30–52.Google Scholar
  19. Kukk, A., Rajalaane, R., Rei, M.-L., & Piht, S. (2015). Parents opinions on homework in the II stage of primary school (Estonian example). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 134–144.Google Scholar
  20. Majzub, R. M. (2012). Preschool Children’s early mathematics achievement based on gender and ethnicity. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 24–29.Google Scholar
  21. Mattanah, J. F., Pratt, M. W., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2005). Authoritative parenting, parental scaffolding of long-division mathematics, and children’s academic competence in fourth grade. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(1), 85–106.Google Scholar
  22. Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation (revised and expanded from qualitative research and case study applications in education). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013–2025 (preschool to post-secondary education). Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Education Malaysia.Google Scholar
  24. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
  25. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Paik, J. H., van Gelderen, L., Gonzales, M., de Jong, P. F., & Hayes, M. (2011). Cultural differences in early math skills among US, Taiwanese, Dutch, and Peruvian preschoolers. International Journal of Early Years Education, 19(2), 133–143.Google Scholar
  27. Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039–1101.Google Scholar
  28. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.Google Scholar
  29. Pezdek, K., Berry, T., & Renno, P. A. (2002). Children’s mathematics achievement: The role of parents’ perceptions and their involvement in homework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 771–777.Google Scholar
  30. Pratt, M. W., Green, D., MacVicar, J., & Bountrogianni, M. (1992). The mathematical parent: Parental scaffolding, parenting style, and learning outcomes in long-division mathematics homework. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 13(1), 17–34.Google Scholar
  31. Pratt, M. W., Kerig, P., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (1988). Mothers and fathers teaching 3-year-olds: Authoritative parenting and adult scaffolding of young children’s learning. Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 832–839.Google Scholar
  32. Robinson, C. C., Mandleco, B., Olsen, S. F., & Hart, C. H. (2001). The parenting styles and dimensions questionnaire (PSDQ). In B. F. Perlmutter, J. Touliatos, & G. W. Holden (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques: Vol. 3. Instruments & index (pp. 319–321). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 26–33.Google Scholar
  35. Shumow, L. (1998). Promoting parental attunement to children’s mathematical reasoning through parent education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19(1), 109–127.Google Scholar
  36. Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 344–364.Google Scholar
  37. van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.Google Scholar
  38. van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011). Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher-student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 46–57.Google Scholar
  39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wood, D. (1980). Teaching the young children: Some relationship between social interaction, language, and thought. In D. Olson (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought (pp. 281–296). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  41. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.Google Scholar
  42. Wood, D., & Middleton, D. (1975). A study of assisted problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 66(2), 181–191.Google Scholar
  43. Zhou, X., Huang, J., Wang, Z., Wang, B., Zhao, Z., Yang, L., & Yang, Z. (2006). Parent-child interaction and children’s number learning. Early Child Development and Care, 176(7), 763–775.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana-Lea Baranovich
    • 1
  • Pei-Chin Fong
    • 1
  • Fonny Hutagalung
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Education, Department of Ed Psych and CounselingUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations